Patent US5481485A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5481485A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Effective channel length simulation using a single sample transistor
Assignee: NEC Corp
•
Filing: 1995-05-22
•
Granted: 1996-01-02
•
Expires: 2015-05-22
Abstract
Abstract In a device simulation apparatus, the structural parameters of a single sample field effect transistor are retrieved from a memory and a set of voltage parameters is established. A source-drain current value and a potential distribution are derived from the structural parameters. A source-drain resistance value is then derived from the source-drain current value and one of the voltage parameters and a channel resistivity value is derived from the potential distribution and the source-drain current value. One of the voltage parameters is successively updated to repeat the process on the updated parameter to produce a said plurality of source-drain current values and a plurality of channel resistivity values. The effective channel length of the transistor is determined from the source-drain resistance values and the channel resistivity values.
Inventors
- 👤 Kiyoshi Takeuchi
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 03:14
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06F; G06F30/00; G06F30/30; G06F30/36; G06F30/367; G06F30/20; G06F30/23
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 7
Claim 1
Independent Claim
196 words
A method for manufacturing a field effect transistor having a desired effective channel length, the method comprising the steps of: (a) selecting a single sample transistor; (b) measuring the sample transistor in terms of manufacturing process parameters to provide structural data; (c) converting the structural data into an effective channel length by: (c1) determining a plurality of source-drain current values and a plurality of potential distributions corresponding to a plurality of successive sets of voltage parameters, wherein one of the voltage parameters of each of the sets differs from a corresponding voltage parameter of adjacent sets; (c2) determining channel resistivity values corresponding to said plurality of source-drain current values and said plurality of potential distribution, and determining source-drain resistance values corresponding to a plurality of drain-source voltages and source-drain currents; and (c3) finding an effective channel length based upon said channel resistivity values and said source-drain resistance values; (d) comparing the effective channel length with the desired effective channel length; (e) adjusting the manufacturing process parameters; and (f) repeating steps (a) through (e) until the effective channel length found by said measuring and the desired effective channel length differ by, at most, a predetermined allowable error.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
196 words
A method for manufacturing a field effect transistor having a desired effective channel length, the method comprising the steps of: (a) selecting a single sample transistor; (b) measuring the sample transistor in terms of manufacturing process parameters to provide structural data; (c) converting the structural data into an effective channel length by: (c1) determining a plurality of source-drain current values and a plurality of potential distributions corresponding to a plurality of successive sets of voltage parameters, wherein one of the voltage parameters of each of the sets differs from a corresponding voltage parameter of adjacent sets; (c2) determining channel resistivity values corresponding to said plurality of source-drain current values and said plurality of potential distribution, and determining source-drain resistance values corresponding to a plurality of drain-source voltages and source-drain currents; and (c3) finding an effective channel length based upon said channel resistivity values and said source-drain resistance values; (d) comparing the effective channel length with the desired effective channel length; (e) adjusting the manufacturing process parameters; and (f) repeating steps (a) through (e) until the effective channel length found by said measuring and the desired effective channel length differ by, at most, a predetermined allowable error.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the manufacturing process parameters are selected from the group consisting of semiconductor material quality, donor impurity concentration and acceptor impurity concentration.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
63 words
The method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the step of finding an effective channel length is based upon the relationship L.sub.EFF =(R.sub.j -R.sub.k)/(r.sub.j -r.sub.k), where L EFF is effective channel length, R j and R k represent source-drain resistance values, r j and r k represent channel resistivity values, and integers j and k correspond to the different sets of voltage parmeters.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the transistor is a lightly doped drain (LDD) device, and the step of finding the effective channel length is based upon varying the applied voltages while searching for the effective channel length.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
91 words
The method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the step of finding the effective channel length is based upon the relation L.sub.EFF =Cov(r,R)/Var(r), where Cov(r,R) is the covariance of channel resistivity with respect to source drain resistance, and Var(r) is the variance of channel resistivity, with ##EQU2## where i is a variable in the range between 1 and N, where N is the total number of sets of voltage parameters, r i represents each one of the channel resistivity values, and R i represents each one of the source-drain resistance values.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method in accordance with claim 1, wherein the step of adjusting the manufacturing process parameters comprises adjusting at least one in a group consisting of semiconductor material quality, donor impurity concentration, and/or acceptor impurity concentration.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4791593A
Cited
US4939681A
Cited
US5047971A
Cited
US5257200A
Cited
US5265028A
Cited
US5424964A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1999-01-01 | 1999-07-03 | 2000-01-02 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2003-01-01 | 2003-07-03 | 2004-01-02 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2007-01-01 | 2007-07-03 | 2008-01-02 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |