Patent US5475348A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5475348A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Surface wave filter filtering delay transfer function
Assignee: TDK Electronics AG
•
Filing: 1992-10-28
•
Granted: 1995-12-12
•
Expires: 2012-10-28
Abstract
Abstract It consists of several channels (V1, V2) in parallel, which exhibit an inter-transducer gap difference (2 1 -4 1 ; 2 2 -4 2 ) equal to an even multiple of the half-wavelength (λ) at the central frequency, from one channel to the next, so as to cancel the delay line transfer function which corresponds to the direct path between transducers.
Inventors
- 👤 Jean-Michel Hode
- 👤 Jean Desbois
- 👤 Marc Solal
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 00:58
CPC Classifications
H; H03; H03H; H03H9/00; H03H9/0023; H03H9/0028; H03H9/0047; H03H9/0052; H03H9/0057; H03H9/02; H03H9/02535; H03H9/02637; H03H9/02653; H03H9/02818; H03H9/02842; H03H9/0285; H03H9/02905
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
199 words
Surface acoustic wave filter comprising: longitudinal resonant cavities, forming an integer number N, equal to at least 2, of parallel filtering channels each including; an input transducer and an output for each of said filtering channels having a direct path between each said input and output transducers; at least two reflecting gratings in each of said filtering channels; the transmission amplitudes being, at least for each said direct path, substantially the same for these N channels; wherein, the difference in propagation length in the direct path is defined by the center-point distance from said input transducer to a corresponding said output transducer and is, for two consecutive channels, substantially equal, to within an integer number of wavelengths (λ) at the central filter frequency (fo), to one Nth of this wavelength (λ), so that for this central frequency (fo), the vector resultant of the signals of these N channels which correspond to the direct paths is substantially zero and that in consequence there is substantially cancellation of the delay line transfer function outside the stop band of the filter; and wherein, each center-point distance from each said input and said output transducers to a closest said reflecting grating are equal.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
199 words
Surface acoustic wave filter comprising: longitudinal resonant cavities, forming an integer number N, equal to at least 2, of parallel filtering channels each including; an input transducer and an output for each of said filtering channels having a direct path between each said input and output transducers; at least two reflecting gratings in each of said filtering channels; the transmission amplitudes being, at least for each said direct path, substantially the same for these N channels; wherein, the difference in propagation length in the direct path is defined by the center-point distance from said input transducer to a corresponding said output transducer and is, for two consecutive channels, substantially equal, to within an integer number of wavelengths (λ) at the central filter frequency (fo), to one Nth of this wavelength (λ), so that for this central frequency (fo), the vector resultant of the signals of these N channels which correspond to the direct paths is substantially zero and that in consequence there is substantially cancellation of the delay line transfer function outside the stop band of the filter; and wherein, each center-point distance from each said input and said output transducers to a closest said reflecting grating are equal.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
17 words
Filter according to claim 1, wherein each transducer/reflector pair forms a single device of the DART type.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
17 words
Filter according to claim 2, wherein that the short-circuit reflection coefficients of the DART devices are equal.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
23 words
Filter according to either one of claims 2 and 3, wherein at least one of the DART devices is weighted by source suppression.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
26 words
Filter according to either one of claims 2 and 3, wherein at least one of the DART devices is weighted by variable overlap of the fingers.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
27 words
Filter according to any one of claims 2 and 3, wherein at least one of the DART devices is of the EWC type with a λ/48 offset.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
26 words
Filter according to any one of claims 2 and 3, wherein at least of the DART devices is of the EWC type with a -λ/16 offset.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
77 words
Filter according to any one of claims 2 and 3, wherein at least one of the DART devices is formed by a set of alternating transmitting cells and reflecting cells, each transmitting cell including three electrodes of width λ/6 spaced 3λ/4 apart over a distance equal to λ with two inactive electrodes followed by an active electrode, and each reflecting cell including two inactive electrodes of width λ/4 spaced 3λ/8 apart over a distance equal to λ.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
45 words
Surface wave filter according to claim 1, wherein said filter is placed on a single substrate and wherein a longitudinal groove is gouged into this substrate between each of the said channels to isolate them from one another in respect of the surface acoustic waves.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
41 words
Surface wave filter according to claim 1, wherein said filter is placed on a single substrate and in that a longitudinal layer of a material absorbent in respect to the surface acoustic waves is deposited between each of the said channels.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
26 words
Surface wave filter according to claim 1, wherein characterized in that each of these channels is symmetric with respect to the mid-line of the inter-transducer gap.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
20 words
Surface wave filter according to claim 1, wherein each of these channels includes a central reflector and two outer reflectors.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
48 words
Surface wave filter according to claim 1, wherein said filter it includes an odd number of channels and in that each of these channels is without a central reflector but replete with outer reflectors, the angle of the modulus of the reflection coefficient therefore being chosen as zero.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
97 words
Surface wave filter according to claim 1, wherein said filter ensures rejection in the direct path for the frequencies which, in the stop band, are distant from the said central frequency by the placing in parallel of two of these aforesaid multichannel structures, these structures being of the same type, but the offsets of the direct paths is X-λ/2 and X+λ/2, wherein X is the direct path, said offsets varying in opposite directions from one structure to the other with respect to the longitudinal axis of symmetry of the assembly and on proceeding away from the latter.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
27 words
Filter according to claim 1 wherein the number of electrodes of the central reflector is chosen so that the reflection coefficient is substantially equal to -3 dB.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
36 words
Filter according to claim 15, wherein the central reflector (81, 82) is furthermore weighted by electrode suppression and that it includes neutral cells which replace the suppressed electrodes so as to maintain a constant metallization ratio.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
44 words
Surface wave filter according to claim 1, wherein said filter is placed on a single substrate and in that the said channels are offset longitudinally with respect to one another so as to cancel, by placing in phase opposition, the couplings between these channels.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
27 words
Filter according to claim 1, wherein said filter comprises no processing against the bulk waves of the substrate on which the members of the filter are installed.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
129 words
The surface acoustic wave filter of claim 1, further comprising: at least three said parallel filtering channels having a common input for each of said input transducers and a common output for each of said output transducers; wherein, a direct path length for each of the parallel filtering channels (V1, V2, . . . VN) is set by the following empirical equation: X for channel V1 X+λ/2N for channel V2 X+λ/N for channel V3 X+(N-2).λ/2N for channel VN-1 and, X+(N-1).λ/2N for channel VN; and wherein, X is a distance for the direct path of the first channel, N is a total number of said parallel filtering channels, VN is a number for the parallel filtering channels, and λ is the wavelength of the central frequency passed by said filter.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
134 words
The surface acoustic wave filter of claim 1, further comprising: a first pair of said parallel filtering channels having a direct path length X for one of the parallel filtering channels of said first pair and a direct path X-λ/2 for a second of the parallel filtering channels of said first pair; a second pair of parallel filtering channels, one of the parallel filtering channels of said second pair having said direct path length X and a second parallel filtering channel of said second pair having a direct path defined by the distance X-λ/2; and wherein, the input transducers for said first and said second pair of said parallel filtering channels have a common input and said output transducers of said first and second pairs of said parallel filtering channels have a common output.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4390854A
Cited
US4609891A
Cited
US4764701A
Cited
US5264751A
Cited
US5319326A
Cited
US5296624A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-12-11 | 1999-06-12 | 1999-12-12 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-12-11 | 2003-06-12 | 2003-12-12 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-12-11 | 2007-06-12 | 2007-12-12 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |