Patent US5455832A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5455832A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method and system for testing a sonet network element

Assignee: Nytell Software LLC
•
Filing: 1993-12-17
•
Granted: 1995-10-03
•
Expires: 2013-12-17
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Method and system are described for testing SONET network elements (NE) against various SONET logical layer criteria or standards. A "basic" signal is developed or generated to meet many of the criteria in order to minimize the number of alarms or abnormal conditions reported by the NE. Simple procedures are provided to modify the basic signal. The test signals are utilized to test a network element's ability to detect and respond to incoming signal failures and maintenance signals, its payload mappings, and its use of various overload bits and bytes.

Inventors

  • 👤 Thomas A. Bowmaster

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-01 20:11
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04L; H04L43/00; H04L43/50; G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/317; G01R31/3181; G01R31/3183; G01R31/318328; H04J; H04J3/00; H04J3/02; H04J3/06; H04J3/062; H04J3/0623; H04J3/14; H04J2203/00; H04J2203/0001; H04J2203/0062

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim 258 words
A method for testing a SONET network element having performance monitoring parameters defined for at least one logical layer and capable of performing at least one performance monitoring function, the network element having a normal operating state and a trouble state, the method comprising the steps of: generating a basic test signal; modifying the basic test signal to obtain a modified test signal; detecting the modified test signal at the network element to cause the network element to change from the normal operating state to the trouble state, the network element initiating a set of actions in response to the modified test signal; monitoring the modified test signal to determine whether the network element is to change back from the trouble state to the normal operating state, wherein the improvement comprises: the modified test signal includes a first error portion which is followed by a first error-free portion having a first predetermined time period followed by a trouble portion of sufficient length to be detected and cause the network element to change from the normal operating state to the trouble state, said trouble portion being followed by a second error-free portion having a second predetermined time period and followed by a second error portion, wherein the modified test signal tests the at least one logical layer and wherein the set of actions includes inhibiting accumulation of the parameters during a time period in which the network element is in the trouble state and accumulating parameters associated with the first and second error portions of the modified test signal.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 258 words
A method for testing a SONET network element having performance monitoring parameters defined for at least one logical layer and capable of performing at least one performance monitoring function, the network element having a normal operating state and a trouble state, the method comprising the steps of: generating a basic test signal; modifying the basic test signal to obtain a modified test signal; detecting the modified test signal at the network element to cause the network element to change from the normal operating state to the trouble state, the network element initiating a set of actions in response to the modified test signal; monitoring the modified test signal to determine whether the network element is to change back from the trouble state to the normal operating state, wherein the improvement comprises: the modified test signal includes a first error portion which is followed by a first error-free portion having a first predetermined time period followed by a trouble portion of sufficient length to be detected and cause the network element to change from the normal operating state to the trouble state, said trouble portion being followed by a second error-free portion having a second predetermined time period and followed by a second error portion, wherein the modified test signal tests the at least one logical layer and wherein the set of actions includes inhibiting accumulation of the parameters during a time period in which the network element is in the trouble state and accumulating parameters associated with the first and second error portions of the modified test signal.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the set of actions includes a subset of immediate actions and a subset of delayed actions.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the first error portion includes a single error and the second error portion includes two errors.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 29 words
The method as claimed in claim 3 wherein the single error of the first error portion is identical to each of the two errors of the second error portion.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the first predetermined time period is equal to the second predetermined time period.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 21 words
The method as claimed in claim 5 wherein the first and second predetermined time periods are both equal to one second.
Claim 8
Independent Claim 266 words
A system for testing a SONET network element having performance monitoring parameters defined for at least one logical layer and capable of performing at least one performance monitoring function, the network element having a normal operating state and a trouble state, the system comprising: means for generating a basic test signal; means for modifying the basic test signal to obtain a modified test signal; means for detecting the modified test signal at the network element to cause the network element to change from the normal operating state to the trouble state, the network element initiating a set of actions in response to the modified test signal; means for monitoring the modified test signal to determine whether the network element is to change back from the trouble state to the normal operating state, wherein the improvement comprises: the modified test signal includes a first error portion which is followed by a first error-free portion having a first predetermined time period which is followed by a trouble portion of sufficient length to be detected and cause the network element to change from the normal operating state to the trouble state, said trouble portion being followed by a second error-free portion having a second predetermined time period which is followed by a second error portion, wherein the modified test signal tests the at least one logical layer and wherein the set of actions includes inhibiting accumulation of the parameters during a time period in which the network element is in the trouble state and accumulating parameters associated with the first and second error portions of the modified test signal.
Claim 9
Independent Claim 266 words
A system for testing a SONET network element having performance monitoring parameters defined for at least one logical layer and capable of performing at least one performance monitoring function, the network element having a normal operating state and a trouble state, the system comprising: means for generating a basic test signal; means for modifying the basic test signal to obtain a modified test signal; means for detecting the modified test signal at the network element to cause the network element to change from the normal operating state to the trouble state, the network element initiating a set of actions in response to the modified test signal; means for monitoring the modified test signal to determine whether the network element is to change back from the trouble state to the normal operating state, wherein the improvement comprises: the modified test signal includes a first error portion which is followed by a first error-free portion having a first predetermined time period which is followed by a trouble portion of sufficient length to be detected and cause the network element to change from the normal operating state to the trouble state, said trouble portion being followed by a second error-free portion having a second predetermined time period which is followed by a second error portion, wherein the modified test signal tests the at least one logical layer and wherein the set of actions includes inhibiting accumulation of the parameters during a time period in which the network element is in the trouble state and accumulating parameters associated with the first and second error portions of the modified test signal.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 24 words
The system as claimed in claim 7 wherein the set of actions includes a subset of immediate actions and a subset of delayed actions.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 24 words
The system as claimed in claim 7 wherein the first error portion includes a single error and the second error portion includes two errors.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 29 words
The system as claimed in claim 7 wherein the single error of the first error portion is identical to each of the two errors of the second error portion.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 21 words
The system as claimed in claim 7 wherein the first predetermined time period is equal to the second predetermined time period.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 21 words
The system as claimed in claim 11 wherein the first and second predetermined time periods are both equal to one second.
Claim 15
Independent Claim 155 words
A method for testing a SONET network element, the method comprising the steps of: generating a test signal including a payload pointer initially having a first pointer value and subsequently having a second pointer value different from the first pointer value, the payload pointer indicating the location of the beginning of an incoming synchronous payload envelope (SPE) of the test signal in order to extract a payload signal therefrom, the payload signal including information bytes having a predetermined pattern; detecting the test signal at the network element so that the network element extracts the payload signal from the SPE and to detect the information bytes having the predetermined pattern; and determining a delay between a first occurrence of the second pointer value and a time when the extracted payload signal includes only the information bytes having the predetermined pattern, wherein the delay indicates how long the network element delays in using the second pointer value.
Claim 16
Independent Claim 155 words
A method for testing a SONET network element, the method comprising the steps of: generating a test signal including a payload pointer initially having a first pointer value and subsequently having a second pointer value different from the first pointer value, the payload pointer indicating the location of the beginning of an incoming synchronous payload envelope (SPE) of the test signal in order to extract a payload signal therefrom, the payload signal including information bytes having a predetermined pattern; detecting the test signal at the network element so that the network element extracts the payload signal from the SPE and to detect the information bytes having the predetermined pattern; and determining a delay between a first occurrence of the second pointer value and a time when the extracted payload signal includes only the information bytes having the predetermined pattern, wherein the delay indicates how long the network element delays in using the second pointer value.
Claim 17
Independent Claim 158 words
A system for testing a SONET network element, the system comprising: means for generating a test signal including a payload pointer initially having a first pointer value and subsequently having a second pointer value different from the first pointer value, the payload pointer indicating the location of the beginning of an incoming synchronous payload envelope (SPE) of the test signal in order to extract a payload signal therefrom, the payload signal including information bytes having a predetermined pattern; means for detecting the test signal at the network element so that the network element extracts the payload signal from the SPE and to detect the information bytes having the predetermined pattern; and means for determining a delay between a first occurrence of the second pointer value and a time when the extracted payload signal includes only the information bytes having the predetermined pattern, wherein the delay indicates how long the network element delays in using the second pointer value.
Claim 18
Independent Claim 158 words
A system for testing a SONET network element, the system comprising: means for generating a test signal including a payload pointer initially having a first pointer value and subsequently having a second pointer value different from the first pointer value, the payload pointer indicating the location of the beginning of an incoming synchronous payload envelope (SPE) of the test signal in order to extract a payload signal therefrom, the payload signal including information bytes having a predetermined pattern; means for detecting the test signal at the network element so that the network element extracts the payload signal from the SPE and to detect the information bytes having the predetermined pattern; and means for determining a delay between a first occurrence of the second pointer value and a time when the extracted payload signal includes only the information bytes having the predetermined pattern, wherein the delay indicates how long the network element delays in using the second pointer value.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US5130980A Cited
US5251204A Cited
US5132991A Cited
US5301050A Cited
US5369653A Cited
US5365510A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1998-10-02 1999-04-03 1999-10-03 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2002-10-02 2003-04-03 2003-10-03 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2006-10-02 2007-04-03 2007-10-03 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag