Patent US5453840A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5453840A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Cross correlation image sensor alignment system

Assignee: Eastman Kodak Co
•
Filing: 1994-01-27
•
Granted: 1995-09-26
•
Expires: 2014-01-27
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A system which uses a random noise test target 16 to align sensors 10 and 12 by performing mathematical cross correlations between sensors 10 and 12. The system 48 includes a computer 58 rotating one of the images, computing a correlation between the rotated image and a reference image and determining the peak in the correlation. A global maximum is used to interpolate a true subpixel peak. The interpolated rotational cross correlation peak is used to determine values of two dimensional and rotational movement of one of the sensors 10 and 12 necessary to align the sensors. The values are used to move the sensor 10 or 12 and it is fixed in place. Once the sensors have been aligned and fixed in place, the system 118 computes the cross correlation of segments of the image to determine delay values and an interpolation filter coefficient values which are stored in a permanent storage device 120. The coefficients are used by an correction circuit 122 to correct for regional or spatially varying alignment errors during real time image processing by the imaging system.

Inventors

  • 👤 Martin A. Parker
  • 👤 Kenneth A. Parulski

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-09 13:40
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04N; H04N23/00; H04N23/10; H04N23/13; H04N23/15

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim 86 words
An image sensor alignment system, comprising: a reference sensor producing a reference image from viewing a target; an alignable sensor producing an alignable image from viewing the target; alignment correlation means for determining a multidimensional correlation between the reference image and the alignable image by performing a rotation-translation correlation simultaneously and determining a highest correlation as the alignable image is rotated with respect to the reference image; and sensor alignment means for moving the alignable sensor into alignment responsive to the correlation and producing aligned sensors.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 86 words
An image sensor alignment system, comprising: a reference sensor producing a reference image from viewing a target; an alignable sensor producing an alignable image from viewing the target; alignment correlation means for determining a multidimensional correlation between the reference image and the alignable image by performing a rotation-translation correlation simultaneously and determining a highest correlation as the alignable image is rotated with respect to the reference image; and sensor alignment means for moving the alignable sensor into alignment responsive to the correlation and producing aligned sensors.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 41 words
A system as recited in claim 1, further comprising: correction means for determining segmented cross correlations between images produced by the aligned sensors; and interpolation means for interpolating one of the images after sensor alignment responsive to the segmented cross correlations.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 19 words
A system as recited in claim 2, wherein said correction means performs a translation cross correlation for each segment.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 24 words
A system as recited in claim 1, wherein the correlation comprises a correlation selected from among cross correlation, differential correlation and Fourier transform correlation.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 94 words
An image sensor alignment system, comprising: a reference sensor producing a reference image from viewing a target; an alignable sensor producing an alignable image from viewing the target; alignment correlation means for determining a multidimensional correlation between the reference image and the alignable image by determining a highest correlation as the alignable image is rotated with respect to the reference image; sensor alignment means for moving the alignable sensor into alignment responsive to the correlation and producing aligned sensors; and a white noise target with subpixel features imaged by said reference and alignable sensors.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 94 words
An image sensor alignment system, comprising: a reference sensor producing a reference image from viewing a target; an alignable sensor producing an alignable image from viewing the target; alignment correlation means for determining a multidimensional correlation between the reference image and the alignable image by determining a highest correlation as the alignable image is rotated with respect to the reference image; sensor alignment means for moving the alignable sensor into alignment responsive to the correlation and producing aligned sensors; and a white noise target with subpixel features imaged by said reference and alignable sensors.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 41 words
A system as recited in claim 5, wherein said target has reflective or transmissive areas at random locations, and when one of said sensors produces an in focus image a two dimensional autocorrelation function of the image has a rotational-translational peak.
Claim 9
Independent Claim 42 words
An apparatus for use in image sensor alignment, said apparatus comprising: a target for use in correlation alignment of image sensors, said target comprising: a substrate; and white noise reflective or transmissive areas formed on said substrate and located at regular locations.
Claim 10
Independent Claim 42 words
An apparatus for use in image sensor alignment, said apparatus comprising: a target for use in correlation alignment of image sensors, said target comprising: a substrate; and white noise reflective or transmissive areas formed on said substrate and located at regular locations.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 43 words
An apparatus as recited in claim 7, wherein said white noise areas have a spectral response for each area over a range of wave lengths detected by the sensors that is related to the spectral response of each other area by a scalar.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 32 words
An apparatus as recited in claim 7, wherein each area has a predetermined probability of having a reflectance or transmission between maximum and minimum reflectance or transmittance values obtained on said substrate.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 35 words
An apparatus as recited in claim 7, wherein when an in focus image of the target is produced by one of the sensors, a two dimensional autocorrelation function of the image has a prominent peak.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 14 words
A target as recited in claim 7, wherein said areas comprise subpixel size features.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 24 words
A system as recited in claim 7, wherein said correlation comprises a correlation selected from among cross correlation, differential correlation and Fourier transform correlation.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 285 words
An image sensor alignment system, comprising: a reference sensor producing a reference image divided into blocks; an alignable sensor producing an alignable image divided into blocks; an image sensor alignment target for cross correlation alignment of said reference and alignable sensors, said target comprising: a substrate; and white noise reflective or transmissive areas of subpixel size formed on said substrate, a spectral response of each area over a range of wave lengths detected by the reference and alignable sensors is related to the spectral response of each other area by a scalar where each area has a predetermined probability of having a reflectance or transmission between a maximum reflectance or transmission obtainable with said substrate and the areas are located at random locations and when images of the target are produced by said reference and alignable sensors a periodic autocorrelation of the images when in perfect alignment has a prominent peak; alignment correlation means for simultaneously, determining a rotational-translational correlation between the reference image and the alignable image by determining a highest image correlation as the alignable image is rotated with respect to the reference image; sensor alignment means for moving the alignment sensor into alignment responsive to the highest image correlation and producing aligned sensors; correction correlation means for determining correction correlations between the corresponding blocks of the image data produced by the aligned sensors by determining a highest block correlation as one of the blocks produced by the alignable sensor is shifted with respect to the corresponding one of the blocks of the reference sensor; coefficient means for determining correction values for the corresponding blocks responsive to the correction [cross]correlations; and a coefficient bin interpolation filter correcting misregistration errors using the correction values.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 285 words
An image sensor alignment system, comprising: a reference sensor producing a reference image divided into blocks; an alignable sensor producing an alignable image divided into blocks; an image sensor alignment target for cross correlation alignment of said reference and alignable sensors, said target comprising: a substrate; and white noise reflective or transmissive areas of subpixel size formed on said substrate, a spectral response of each area over a range of wave lengths detected by the reference and alignable sensors is related to the spectral response of each other area by a scalar where each area has a predetermined probability of having a reflectance or transmission between a maximum reflectance or transmission obtainable with said substrate and the areas are located at random locations and when images of the target are produced by said reference and alignable sensors a periodic autocorrelation of the images when in perfect alignment has a prominent peak; alignment correlation means for simultaneously, determining a rotational-translational correlation between the reference image and the alignable image by determining a highest image correlation as the alignable image is rotated with respect to the reference image; sensor alignment means for moving the alignment sensor into alignment responsive to the highest image correlation and producing aligned sensors; correction correlation means for determining correction correlations between the corresponding blocks of the image data produced by the aligned sensors by determining a highest block correlation as one of the blocks produced by the alignable sensor is shifted with respect to the corresponding one of the blocks of the reference sensor; coefficient means for determining correction values for the corresponding blocks responsive to the correction [cross]correlations; and a coefficient bin interpolation filter correcting misregistration errors using the correction values.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 31 words
A system as recited in claim 13, wherein said alignment correlation means and said correction correlation means perform a correlation selected from among cross correlation, differential correlation and Fourier transform correlation.
Claim 19
Independent Claim 83 words
A method of correcting spatially varying misregistration errors of images produced by solid state image sensors, said method comprising the steps of (a) obtaining image data captured by the solid state sensors sensing a same target after sensor alignment; (b) dividing the image data into corresponding blocks; (c) determining a misregistration between each of the corresponding blocks; (d) determining correction values for correcting the misregistration; and (e) interpolating image data captured by one of the solid state sensors responsive to the correction values.
Claim 20
Independent Claim 83 words
A method of correcting spatially varying misregistration errors of images produced by solid state image sensors, said method comprising the steps of (a) obtaining image data captured by the solid state sensors sensing a same target after sensor alignment; (b) dividing the image data into corresponding blocks; (c) determining a misregistration between each of the corresponding blocks; (d) determining correction values for correcting the misregistration; and (e) interpolating image data captured by one of the solid state sensors responsive to the correction values.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1998-09-25 1999-03-27 1999-09-26 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2002-09-25 2003-03-27 2003-09-26 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2006-09-25 2007-03-27 2007-09-26 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag