Patent US5420441A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5420441A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Automated technique for calibrating a storage phosphor reader
Assignee: Eastman Kodak Co
•
Filing: 1993-11-23
•
Granted: 1995-05-30
•
Expires: 2013-11-23
Abstract
Abstract An automated method for analyzing the photometric calibration and image quality performance characteristics of a high resolution storage phosphor reader. A custom fabricated, lead mask test target is secured to a storage phosphor and exposed using a standard medical x-ray source. A storage phosphor reader, to be calibrated, reads the exposed storage phosphor to produce a digital x-ray image. The digital x-ray image is analyzed by means of a computer algorithm which presents analytic results in text and graphical form to isolate reader problems and to quantify calibration status of the reader.
Inventors
- 👤 J. Daniel Newman
- 👤 Daniel K. McBride
- 👤 James C. Montoro
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 14:33
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01T; G01T1/00; G01T1/16; G01T1/20; G01T1/2012; G01T1/2014
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
96 words
An automated method for analyzing the photometric calibration and image quality performance characteristics of a storage phosphor reader comprising the steps of: exposing to x-rays a storage phosphor through a lead mask test target having a plurality of calibrated density regions useful in analyzing x-ray image characteristics and storage phosphor reader characteristics; reading said exposed storage phosphor by means of a storage phosphor reader to be calibrated, to produce a digital test target image; and digitally processing said digital test target image to produce analytical results of preselected x-ray image characteristics and storage phosphor reader characteristics.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
96 words
An automated method for analyzing the photometric calibration and image quality performance characteristics of a storage phosphor reader comprising the steps of: exposing to x-rays a storage phosphor through a lead mask test target having a plurality of calibrated density regions useful in analyzing x-ray image characteristics and storage phosphor reader characteristics; reading said exposed storage phosphor by means of a storage phosphor reader to be calibrated, to produce a digital test target image; and digitally processing said digital test target image to produce analytical results of preselected x-ray image characteristics and storage phosphor reader characteristics.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
88 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in said exposing step, said lead mask test target has calibrated density regions useful in analyzing one or more of the following x-ray image characteristics and/or storage phosphor reader characteristics, i.e., exposure latitude and linearity, electronic signal-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution, geometric linearity of the reader, artifacts due to mechanical vibration of the reader, artifacts due to electronic noise, and flare light artifacts and wherein said digital processing of said digital test target image produces analytical results of said one or more characteristics.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
31 words
The method of claim 1 including the step of displaying said analytical results produced by said digitally processing step on a video monitor to apprise a viewer of said preselected characteristics.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method of claim 3 wherein said analytical results are displayed on said video monitor in a tabular format and/or a graphical format.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in said exposing step, said lead mask test target includes a composite of layers of lead mask regions, wherein stacked lead mask regions provide different densities to x-rays.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 5 wherein each layer of lead mask regions of said lead mask target has a uniform thickness which is the same for each layer.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said exposing step is carried out by an x-ray generator, which is set at fixed operating parameters including, distance from x-ray generator to storage phosphor, x-ray generator peak voltage setting and total integrated current flow, and x-ray beam filtration.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said exposing step includes the step of measuring the x-ray beam energy at the storage phosphor plane, and storing the measured value for use in said step of digitally processing said digital test target image.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method of claim 8 wherein said step of measuring the x-ray beam energy is done with a calibrated x-ray photodetector which includes a photosensor and a phosphor covering the photosensor, said phosphor converting x-ray energy into light energy sensed by said photosensor.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in said exposing step said lead mask target includes precisely located corner points, and wherein in said digitally processing step, the location of said corner points is established and the tilt of the test target is determined to be within or without predetermined limits.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 10 wherein in said digitally processing step, said corner points are located by an edge detection algorithm.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 11 wherein said edge detection algorithm is a differential contrast edge detection algorithm.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in said exposing step, said lead mask target includes a plurality of different step wedge regions having graded lead thicknesses representing image tone scale gradations, and wherein in said digitally processing step, exposure latitude of each read tone scale region is determined by measuring the average value and variance thereof.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method of claim 13 wherein after said exposure latitude is determined for each of said tone scale regions, the signal to noise ratio(SNR) is determined for each said tone scale region.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 14 wherein said SNR is determined by measuring the standard deviation over a substantial number of pixel locations in each of said tone scale regions.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in said exposing step, said lead mask target includes at least one set of line resolution bar regions in each of two orthogonal directions on said target, and wherein in said digitally processing step, the spatial resolution is determined in each of said directions from said line resolution regions.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
61 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in said exposing step, said lead mask target includes alternating regions of high density and low density along orthogonal directions on said target, and wherein in said digitally processing step, the geometric scan linearity in said orthogonal directions is determined from measurement of the distance between said alternating regions of high density and low density.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in said exposing step, said lead mask target includes a region of low density for determining banding noise power, and wherein in said digitally processing step, the banding noise power is determined using Fast Fourier Transform.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in said exposing step, said lead mask target includes a region of high density for determining electronic noise, and wherein in said digitally processing step, the electronic noise is determined using Fast Fourier Transform.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
49 words
The method of claim 1 wherein in said exposing step, said lead mask target includes regions of low and high density for determining flare, and wherein in said digitally processing step, the flare is determined by measuring the ratio of the dark signal average to the bright signal average.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2426884A
Cited
USRE31847E
Cited
US5336880A
Cited
US5122664A
Cited
US5191621A
Cited
US5151592A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1998-05-29 | 1998-11-28 | 1999-05-30 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2002-05-29 | 2002-11-28 | 2003-05-30 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2006-05-29 | 2006-11-28 | 2007-05-30 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |