Patent US5311131A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5311131A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Magnetic resonance imaging using pattern recognition
Assignee: University of Washington
•
Filing: 1992-05-15
•
Granted: 1994-05-10
•
Expires: 2012-05-15
Abstract
Abstract An MRI technique in which the similarity of samples from different portions of a body is determined and displayed. In one embodiment, the method can be used to track the spread of a known primary tumor to other portions of a patient's body. The MRI apparatus is used to produce a training set comprising one or more training samples. The training set is formed from a plurality of congruent first images of a training region of the body. Each first image is produced using an MRI pulse sequence different from the pulse sequences used to produce the other first images. Each first image comprise an array of pixels, and each training sample comprises a spatially aligned set of pixels from each first image. The same technique is used to produce a plurality of test samples corresponding to a test region of the same body. The test samples are produced using the same pulse sequences as the training samples. The training and test samples are then compared, to produce similarity data indicating, for each test sample, the degree of similarity between the test sample and the training samples. A display is then generated based upon the similarity data.
Inventors
- 👤 Justin P. Smith
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 21:36
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R33/00; G01R33/20; G01R33/44; G01R33/48; G01R33/58; G01R33/54; G01R33/56
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim
200 words
A method of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to produce an image of a body, the method comprising the steps of: using an MRI apparatus to produce a training set comprising one or more training samples, the training set being formed from a plurality of congruent first images of a training region of the body, each first image being produced using an MRI pulse sequence different from the pulse sequences used to produce the other first images, each first image comprising an array of pixels, each training sample comprising a spatially aligned set of pixels from each first image; using an MRI apparatus to produce a test set comprising a plurality of test samples, the test set being formed from a plurality of congruent second images of a test region of the same body, the second images being produced using the same MRI pulse sequences as the first images, each second image comprising an array of pixels, each test sample comprising a spatially aligned set of pixels from each second image; producing similarty data indicating, for each test sample, the degree of similarity between the test sample and the training samples; and producing a display based upon the similarity data.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
200 words
A method of using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to produce an image of a body, the method comprising the steps of: using an MRI apparatus to produce a training set comprising one or more training samples, the training set being formed from a plurality of congruent first images of a training region of the body, each first image being produced using an MRI pulse sequence different from the pulse sequences used to produce the other first images, each first image comprising an array of pixels, each training sample comprising a spatially aligned set of pixels from each first image; using an MRI apparatus to produce a test set comprising a plurality of test samples, the test set being formed from a plurality of congruent second images of a test region of the same body, the second images being produced using the same MRI pulse sequences as the first images, each second image comprising an array of pixels, each test sample comprising a spatially aligned set of pixels from each second image; producing similarty data indicating, for each test sample, the degree of similarity between the test sample and the training samples; and producing a display based upon the similarity data.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the training set comprises a plurality of training samples.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
38 words
The method of claim 2, wherein for each test sample, the similarity data is produced by determining similarity values that represent the similarity between each training sample and the test sample, and then selecting the greatest similarity value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 2, wherein for each test sample, the similarity data is produced by determining the similarity of the test sample to an average of the training samples.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the MRI pulse sequences comprise a T1-weighted pulse sequence, a multiple spin echo pulse sequence, and an STIR pulse sequence.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the step of producing a display comprises displaying a selected one of the second images, and visually highlighting those portions of the selected second image that correspond to the test samples having the highest degree of similarity.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 6, wherein that the selected second image is displayed using a grey scale, and wherein the highlighting is performed in color.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
28 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second images are the same as one another, the training and test sets being formed from different portions thereof.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second images are different from one another, and wherein the training region and test region comprise different portions of the body.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 9, wherein the first and second images are produced using the same MRI apparatus.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second images are different from one another, and wherein the training region and test region represent the same region of the body, the first and second images being produced at different times.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the display identifies the test samples having the highest degree of similarity to the training samples.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
18 words
The method of claim 1, comprising the further steps of converting the similarity data into a similarity image.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 13, comprising the further step of combining the similarity image with one of the second images to produce the display.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 14, wherein the similarity image comprises a plurality of pixels, and wherein the combining step comprises adjusting the intensity of the pixels of the similarity image that are above a predetermined threshold to produce a modified similarity image, and subtracting the modified similarity image from the selected second image.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
190 words
The method of claim 1, wherein each pixel comprises a pixel value corresponding to the intensity of a magnetic resonance signal from a corresponding position within the body, wherein the training set includes at least one spatial correlation image corresponding to and congruent with one of the first images, the spatial correlation image comprising an array of spatial correlation pixels, each spatial correlation pixel having a pixel value that is a predetermined function of one or more neighboring pixel values in said corresponding one first image, wherein each training sample comprises a spatially aligned set of pixels from each first image and from each first spatial correlation image, wherein the test set includes at least one second spatial correlation image corresponding to and congruent with one of the second images, the second spatial correlation image comprising an array of second spatial correlation pixels, each second spatial correlation pixel having a pixel value that is a predetermined function of one or more neighboring pixel values in said corresponding second image, each test sample comprising a spatially aligned set of pixels from each second image and from each second spatial correlation image.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 16, wherein said predetermined function is an average value function.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method of claim 16, wherein two spatial correlation images are generated for each of the first and second images, one in which the spatial correlation pixel values are averages of the first nearest neighbor pixels, and the other in which the spatial correlation pixel values are averages of the second nearest neighbor pixels.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1997-05-09 | 1997-11-08 | 1998-05-10 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2001-05-09 | 2001-11-08 | 2002-05-10 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2005-05-09 | 2005-11-08 | 2006-05-10 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |