Patent US5305221A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5305221A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Real world modeling and control process for integrated manufacturing equipment

Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1990-05-04
•
Granted: 1994-04-19
•
Expires: 2010-05-04
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract This process models production integrated processing equipment, also known as cluster tools, modular equipment, track systems, etc. Further, the model produced by this invention is a real-world model, i.e., it is realistic and validatable. In addition, the invention provides a process for developing machine-specific implementations for PIPEs performing such complex processes as plasma etching, plasma deposition, chemical-vapor deposition, physical-vapor deposition, photolithography, photo-resist processing, rapid thermal processing, and oxidation, as well as other processes. The PIPE-specific model can be used for performance analysis. The effect of changes in process times, process recipes, and process mixtures on cycle time, throughput, resource utilization, and bottlenecks can be analyzed. These PIPE models may be used in the design or redesign of PIPEs. Further, the PIPE-specific model can be used to control material movement in the PIPE, including buffer dynamics to avoid machine lock-up. The PIPE-specific models may be used as part of computer-integrated manufacturing systems that control factories. The real-world modeling and control of these complex PIPE systems has become necessary with the recent introduction of such integrated equipment.

Inventors

  • 👤 Robert W. Atherton

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-30 16:40
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q10/00; G06Q10/06; G05; G05B; G05B19/00; G05B19/02; G05B19/418; G05B19/41885; Y; Y02; Y02P; Y02P90/00; Y02P90/02

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 34
Claim 1
Independent Claim 164 words
A process for modeling production integrated processing equipment (PIPE), which comprises identifying sufficient physical elements within the PIPE between which parts move while within the PIPE so that the parts within the PIPE may be attributed to one of the physical elements at all times while the parts are within the PIPE, constructing a data structure representing the physical elements, listing events occurring in the physical elements, mapping each event onto the data structure, defining the generation of dynamic events, including new events from old events, inputting PIPE specific data, implementing the dynamic events using discrete-event simulation, collecting statistics on performance variables to define and refine the operating rules and buffer dynamics which specify how the parts interact with the physical elements in actual operation of the PIPE, using a resulting model to simulate operation of the PIPE, comparing predictions obtained with the simulation with observed trends in the PIPE, and using the comparison to further refine the choice of fundamental rules and parameters.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 164 words
A process for modeling production integrated processing equipment (PIPE), which comprises identifying sufficient physical elements within the PIPE between which parts move while within the PIPE so that the parts within the PIPE may be attributed to one of the physical elements at all times while the parts are within the PIPE, constructing a data structure representing the physical elements, listing events occurring in the physical elements, mapping each event onto the data structure, defining the generation of dynamic events, including new events from old events, inputting PIPE specific data, implementing the dynamic events using discrete-event simulation, collecting statistics on performance variables to define and refine the operating rules and buffer dynamics which specify how the parts interact with the physical elements in actual operation of the PIPE, using a resulting model to simulate operation of the PIPE, comparing predictions obtained with the simulation with observed trends in the PIPE, and using the comparison to further refine the choice of fundamental rules and parameters.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 30 words
The process of claim 1 additionally comprising the step of grouping the physical elements in the PIPE by function, and in which operations steps are assigned to the physical elements.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 14 words
The process of claim 1 in which operations sequences in the PIPE are dynamic.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 16 words
The process of claim 1 in which operations sequences in the PIPE follow a strict routing.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 13 words
The process of claim 1 in which the PIPE is a track system.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 24 words
The process of claim 1 additionally comprising the steps of generating control rules for the movement of parts through the PIPE, including buffer dynamics.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 30 words
The process of claim 1 in which the model is used for analysis of operating algorithms to avoid machine lock-up in the movement of the parts between the physical elements.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 20 words
The process of claim 1 in which the model is used for analysis of routing, cycle time, and throughput trade-offs.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 36 words
The process of claim 1 in which the PIPE contains at least one process step chosen from the following set: plasma etching, plasma deposition, chemical-vapor deposition, physical-vapor deposition, photolithography, photo-resist processing, rapid thermal processing, and oxidation.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 18 words
The process of claim 1 wherein the comparison to experimental data is used to provide a validated model.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 182 words
A process for modeling a production integrated processing equipment (PIPE) which has operations sequences consisting of process steps, material movement, and buffer dynamics in which a model describing actual operation of the PIPE is obtained, which comprises choosing a dynamic model for the PIPE including control rules to prevent machine lock-up in movement of parts between physical elements of the PIPE, determining a set of parameters that describe the PIPE including sufficient physical elements within the PIPE between which the parts move while within the PIPE so that the parts within the PIPE may be attributed to one of the physical elements at all times while the parts are within the PIPE, describing the parameters in terms of data structures of the chosen model, the chosen PIPE-specific dynamic model containing descriptions of the dynamic interactions of parts and the physical elements in the PIPE, simulating the dynamic behavior of the PIPE using the chosen PIPE-specific dynamic model, comparing predictions obtained with the simulation using the model with observed trends in the PIPE, and using the comparison to refine and validate the model.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 182 words
A process for modeling a production integrated processing equipment (PIPE) which has operations sequences consisting of process steps, material movement, and buffer dynamics in which a model describing actual operation of the PIPE is obtained, which comprises choosing a dynamic model for the PIPE including control rules to prevent machine lock-up in movement of parts between physical elements of the PIPE, determining a set of parameters that describe the PIPE including sufficient physical elements within the PIPE between which the parts move while within the PIPE so that the parts within the PIPE may be attributed to one of the physical elements at all times while the parts are within the PIPE, describing the parameters in terms of data structures of the chosen model, the chosen PIPE-specific dynamic model containing descriptions of the dynamic interactions of parts and the physical elements in the PIPE, simulating the dynamic behavior of the PIPE using the chosen PIPE-specific dynamic model, comparing predictions obtained with the simulation using the model with observed trends in the PIPE, and using the comparison to refine and validate the model.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 14 words
The process of claim 11 in which operations sequences in the PIPE are dynamic.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 13 words
The process of claim 11 in which the PIPE is a track system.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 39 words
The process of claim 11 additionally comprising the steps of using the model for PIPE performance analysis to determine the effect of changes in process times, process recipes, and process mixtures on cycle time, throughput, resource utilization, and bottlenecks.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 16 words
The process of claim 11 additionally comprising the steps of using the model for PIPE design.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 27 words
The process of claim 11 additionally comprising the steps of using the model for control of the PIPE, including parts movement, physical element loadings and parts processing.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 20 words
The process of claim 11 in which the model is used for analysis of routing, cycle time and throughput trade-offs.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 32 words
The process of claim 11 additionally comprising the steps of identifying which phenomena in the PIPE are stochastic in nature, and assigning distributions and parameters of the distributions to the stochastic phenomena.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 30 words
The process of claim 11 additionally comprising the step of grouping the physical elements in the PIPE by function, and in which process steps are assigned to the physical elements.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 24 words
The process of claim 11 additionally comprising the steps of generating control rules for the movement of parts through the PIPE, including buffer dynamics.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 30 words
The process of claim 11 in which the model is used for analysis of operating algorithms to avoid machine lock-up in the movement of the parts between the physical elements.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 36 words
The process of claim 11 in which the PIPE contains at least one process step chosen from the following set: plasma etching, plasma deposition, chemical-vapor deposition, physical-vapor deposition, photolithography, photo-resist processing, rapid thermal processing, and oxidation.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 56 words
The process for modeling a PIPE of claim 11 in which the definition of the PIPE is used to choose a model on the basis of the match between dynamic characteristics of the model and the PIPE definition, and defining additional parameters of fundamental rules from production data of the PIPE to give a validated model.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 18 words
The process of claim 23 additionally comprising the steps of using the model for PIPE design or re-design.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 190 words
In a process for dynamic, real world modeling of a production integrated processing equipment (PIPE) including the steps of specifying machine components in the PIPE and defining lots of parts manufactured in the PIPE, the improvement which comprises specifying sufficient machine components between which the parts move while within the PIPE so that the parts within the PIPE may be attributed to one of the machine components at all times while the parts are within the PIPE, defining a model including dynamic operations sequences as an ordered sequence of operations steps which changes in time as a result of PIPE conditions by using a definition of the PIPE to choose the model on the basis of the match between dynamic characteristics of the model and of the PIPE definition, delineating a set of PIPE operating rules which define how part lots interact with the machine components in actual operation of the PIPE, defining additional parameters of fundamental rules from production data of the PIPE to validate the model, and using the validated model to control the PIPE to avoid machine lock-up in movement of the parts between the machine components.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 190 words
In a process for dynamic, real world modeling of a production integrated processing equipment (PIPE) including the steps of specifying machine components in the PIPE and defining lots of parts manufactured in the PIPE, the improvement which comprises specifying sufficient machine components between which the parts move while within the PIPE so that the parts within the PIPE may be attributed to one of the machine components at all times while the parts are within the PIPE, defining a model including dynamic operations sequences as an ordered sequence of operations steps which changes in time as a result of PIPE conditions by using a definition of the PIPE to choose the model on the basis of the match between dynamic characteristics of the model and of the PIPE definition, delineating a set of PIPE operating rules which define how part lots interact with the machine components in actual operation of the PIPE, defining additional parameters of fundamental rules from production data of the PIPE to validate the model, and using the validated model to control the PIPE to avoid machine lock-up in movement of the parts between the machine components.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 15 words
The process of claim 25 in which the operations sequences in the PIPE are dynamic.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 13 words
The process of claim 25 in which the PIPE is a track system.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 39 words
The process of claim 25 additionally comprising the steps of using the model for PIPE performance analysis to determine the effect of changes in process times, process recipes, and process mixtures on cycle time, throughput, resource utilization, and bottlenecks.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 18 words
The process of claim 25 additionally comprising the steps of using the model for PIPE design or re-design.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 27 words
The process of claim 25 additionally comprising the steps of using the model for control of the PIPE, including parts movement, machine component loadings and parts processing.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim 20 words
The process of claim 25 in which the model is used for analysis of routing, cycle time and throughput trade-offs.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4628435A Cited
US4638227A Cited
US4648766A Cited
US4852001A Cited
US4796194A Cited
US5053970A Cited
US4896269A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1997-04-18 1997-10-18 1998-04-19 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2001-04-18 2001-10-18 2002-04-19 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2005-04-18 2005-10-18 2006-04-19 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag