US5262725A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Magnetic resonance imaging method and device for reducing image errors in a magnetic resonance image
Assignee: US Philips Corp
•
Filing: 1991-12-20
•
Granted: 1993-11-16
•
Expires: 2011-12-20
Abstract
Abstract In magnetic resonance imaging various error sources lead to deterioration of the image quality. One class of errors is formed by errors which vary only slowly over the time required to sample a data line but vary substantially over the time required to acquire data for the complete magnetic resonance image. These error sources are, for example external magnetic fields, motion due to respiration, drift in amplifiers or drift phenomena in permanent magnets due to temperature influences. It is proposed to utilize mutually intersecting data lines in the Fourier domain so as to estimate these error sources and to use these estimates to correct the data sets obtained before execution of image reconstruction.
Inventors
- 👤 Johannes J. M. Cuppen
- 👤 Miha Fuderer
- 👤 Antoon F. Mehlkope
- 👤 Michael J. Duijvestijn
- 👤 Gerrit H. Van Yperen
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 14:23
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R33/00; G01R33/20; G01R33/44; G01R33/48; G01R33/54; G01R33/56; G01R33/565; G01R33/56509
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
186 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method for reducing image errors in a magnetic resonance image formed from magnetic resonance signals from an object arranged in a steady magnetic field, characterized in that magnetic resonance signals are acquired by means of at least first and second pulse and gradient sequences, signal samples thereof being stored in at least a first and a second data set, data lines of the respective data sets intersecting one another in the frequency domain, and that from a combination of data of the intersecting data lines estimates for image error sources are determined after which either on the basis of the estimates determined the data of the data lines in at least one of the data sets is corrected, after which the magnetic resonance image is determined from the corrected data set by means of an integral transformation or, using a Fourier transformation, a third data set is determined from one of the data sets and a fourth data set is determined from the estimates, after which the magnetic resonance image is determined by convolution of the third with the fourth data set.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
186 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method for reducing image errors in a magnetic resonance image formed from magnetic resonance signals from an object arranged in a steady magnetic field, characterized in that magnetic resonance signals are acquired by means of at least first and second pulse and gradient sequences, signal samples thereof being stored in at least a first and a second data set, data lines of the respective data sets intersecting one another in the frequency domain, and that from a combination of data of the intersecting data lines estimates for image error sources are determined after which either on the basis of the estimates determined the data of the data lines in at least one of the data sets is corrected, after which the magnetic resonance image is determined from the corrected data set by means of an integral transformation or, using a Fourier transformation, a third data set is determined from one of the data sets and a fourth data set is determined from the estimates, after which the magnetic resonance image is determined by convolution of the third with the fourth data set.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
79 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the first pulse and gradient sequence comprises an excitation pulse, a phase encoding gradient and a read-out gradient whose gradient directions do not coincide, the second pulse and gradient sequence, also comprising an excitation pulse, a phase encoding gradient and a read-out gradient, deviating from the first pulse and gradient sequence at least in that the phase encoding gradient and the read-out gradient have been interchanged.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
51 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that phase differences of data of the points of intersection of the data lines are used as the combination of data, object shifts associated with data lines being determined from said combination as estimates of the image error sources.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
50 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that phase differences of data of the points of intersection of the data lines are used as the combination of data, stretch factors of the object being derived from said combination as estimates of the image error sources.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
35 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 2, 3, or 4, characterized in that a water or fat component of the object is presaturated prior to the acquisition of the magnetic resonance signals.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
88 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the first pulse and gradient sequence comprises an excitation pulse, a phase encoding gradient and a read-out gradient whose gradient directions do not coincide, the second pulse and gradient sequence, also comprising an excitation pulse, a phase encoding gradient and a read-out gradient, deviating from the first pulse and gradient sequence at least in that the second pulse and gradient sequence comprises an additional phase encoding gradient which is applied simultaneously with the read-out gradient.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
122 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the first pulse and gradient sequence comprises an excitation pulse, a phase encoding gradient and a read-out gradient whose gradient directions do not coincide, the second pulse and gradient sequence, also comprising an excitation pulse, a phase encoding gradient and a read-out gradient, deviating from the first pulse and gradient sequence at least in that an additional gradient is superposed on the phase encoding pulse of the first pulse and gradient sequence, which additional gradient is also applied during the read-out gradient, on the phase encoding gradient of the second pulse and gradient sequence there being superposed the opposed additional gradient which is also applied during the read-out gradient.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
161 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the first pulse and gradient sequence comprises an excitation pulse, a phase encoding gradient and a read-out gradient whose gradient directions do not coincide, the second pulse and gradient sequence, also comprising an excitation pulse and a read-out gradient, deviating from the first pulse and gradient sequence at least in that a further gradient coincident with the read-out gradient is applied with a gradient direction which deviates from that of the read-out gradient, and that in the case of three-dimensional imaging further phase encoding gradients are applied in the first and second pulse and gradient sequences, a third pulse and gradient sequence being applied in order to obtain a third data set for estimation and correction, which third pulse and gradient sequence comprises an excitation pulse and three gradients which are active during the reading out of the magnetic resonance signal and whose gradient directions do not coincide.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
99 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 8, characterized in that phases of data of the points of intersection of the data lines are taken as the combination of data, phases being successively estimated from said combination as estimates of the image error sources of the first and the second data set and data of the data lines being corrected on the basis of the estimated phases, and that in the case of three-dimensional imaging phases of the third data set are estimated, data of the data lines being corrected on the basis of the estimated phases.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
43 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that in the case of two-dimensional imaging the second data set comprises one data line and that in the case of three-dimensional imaging the third data set comprises one data line.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
61 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 9, characterized in that in the case of two-dimensional imaging the second data set comprises several data lines and the estimates are determined by averaging phases thereof, and that in the case of three-dimensional imaging the third data set comprises several data lines and the estimates are determined by averaging phases thereof.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
18 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the estimates are iteratively determined.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
21 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the estimates are weighted in respect of noise.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
180 words
A magnetic resonance imaging device for reducing image errors in a magnetic resonance image formed from magnetic resonance signals from an object arranged in a steady magnetic field, which device comprises means for generating the steady field, means for generating RF electromagnetic pulses, and means for gradient magnetic fields superposed on the steady field, characterized in that the device comprises programmed means for acquiring magnetic resonance signals from the object by means of at least first and second pulse and gradient sequences, signal samples of said signals being stored in at least a first and a second data set, data lines of the respective data sets intersecting one another in the frequency domain, the programmed means also being suitable for determining estimates of image error sources from a combination of data of the intersecting data lines and for subsequently correcting the data of the data lines in at least one of the data sets on the basis of the estimates determined, after which the magnetic resonance image is determined from the corrected data set by way of an integral transformation.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
180 words
A magnetic resonance imaging device for reducing image errors in a magnetic resonance image formed from magnetic resonance signals from an object arranged in a steady magnetic field, which device comprises means for generating the steady field, means for generating RF electromagnetic pulses, and means for gradient magnetic fields superposed on the steady field, characterized in that the device comprises programmed means for acquiring magnetic resonance signals from the object by means of at least first and second pulse and gradient sequences, signal samples of said signals being stored in at least a first and a second data set, data lines of the respective data sets intersecting one another in the frequency domain, the programmed means also being suitable for determining estimates of image error sources from a combination of data of the intersecting data lines and for subsequently correcting the data of the data lines in at least one of the data sets on the basis of the estimates determined, after which the magnetic resonance image is determined from the corrected data set by way of an integral transformation.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
43 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 8, characterized in that in the case of two-dimensional imaging the second data set comprises one data line and that in the case of three-dimensional imaging the third data set comprises one data line.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
62 words
A magnetic resonance imaging method as claimed in claim 8, characterized in that in the case of two dimensional imaging the second data set comprises several data lines and the estimates are determined by averaging phases thereof, and that in the case of three-dimensional imaging the third data set comprises several data lines and the estimates are determined by averaging phase thereof.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4818940A
Cited
EP0212526A2
Cited
US4706026A
Cited
US5126673A
Cited
US4979512A
Cited
JPH0245037A
Cited
US5087880A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-11-15 | 1997-05-17 | 1997-11-16 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-11-15 | 2001-05-17 | 2001-11-16 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-11-15 | 2005-05-17 | 2005-11-16 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |