Patent FR962440A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US5257121A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5257121A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Multi-resolution spatial integration signal processor and method
Assignee: Johns Hopkins University
•
Filing: 1990-08-29
•
Granted: 1993-10-26
•
Expires: 2010-08-29
Abstract
Abstract A signal processor and method for maximizing the detection range of imaging infrared seekers against ship targets. The invention comprises a bank of two-dimensional spatial filters, having rectangular kernels matched to targets of various aspect ratios and sizes, implemented in a separable form that appears well suited to processing in real-time image data acquired sequentially by column.
Inventors
- 👤 Richard A. Steinberg
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 21:00
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S3/00; G01S3/78; G01S3/782; G01S3/785; G01S3/786; G01S3/7864; G01S3/7865; G06; G06T; G06T5/00; G06T5/70
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 28
Claim 1
Independent Claim
93 words
A signal processor for detecting a rectangular or nearly-rectangular target of known orientation in a digitized two-dimensional input image, wherein said target's size, aspect ratio and position in said input image are unknown, and wherein said target has minimum contrast relative to its background in said input image, said signal processor comprising means for generating a plurality of reduced resolution, rectangular images as output from said input image, said input image being generated by an imaging sensor comprised of an array of detector elements and having a higher resolution than said output images.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
93 words
A signal processor for detecting a rectangular or nearly-rectangular target of known orientation in a digitized two-dimensional input image, wherein said target's size, aspect ratio and position in said input image are unknown, and wherein said target has minimum contrast relative to its background in said input image, said signal processor comprising means for generating a plurality of reduced resolution, rectangular images as output from said input image, said input image being generated by an imaging sensor comprised of an array of detector elements and having a higher resolution than said output images.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
45 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 1, further comprising means for preprocessing said input image to smooth and decimate in time the waveforms comprising said input image and received from said detector elements, prior to said input image being received by said generating means.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
52 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 1, wherein said generating means comprises means for averaging in a plurality of stages the waveforms received from said detector elements and comprising said input image, to generate at each stage a rectangular output image at a level of reduced resolution corresponding to said stage.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
92 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 3, wherein said averaging means comprises: means for cross-channel averaging in a plurality of stages said waveforms, to generate at each stage a rectangular, cross-channel output image at a level of reduced cross-channel resolution corresponding to said stage; and means for in-scan averaging in a plurality of sections said cross-channel output images, each of said sections averaging one of said cross-channel output images in a plurality of stages, to generate in each section a plurality of reduced resolution, rectangular output images corresponding to said stages.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
53 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 4, wherein said in-scan averaging means comprises a plurality of sequentially connected delay elements in each of said sections, the outputs of said delay elements being averaged in stages, to generate in each section a plurality of reduced resolution, rectangular output images corresponding to said stages.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
52 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 5, wherein said delay elements whose averaged outputs comprise one of said stages are replaced by one delay element and a fixed gain amplifier connected to said one delay element to produce an infinite-impulse-response output approximation of said delay elements' averaged output in said stage.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
47 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 5, wherein said delay elements whose averaged outputs comprise one of said stages are replaced by a means for decimating in time said cross-channel output image to produce an output equivalent to said delay elements' averaged output in said stage.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
82 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 1, wherein said generating means comprises means for performing a mapping from said higher resolution input image to said reduced resolution, rectangular output images, wherein said performing means comprises means for averaging the pixel values within a rectangular region of dimensions kxn o in said input image, the upper-right-hand corner of said rectangular region being located at the (i,j)-pixel location in said input image, to obtain the (i,j)-pixel value in each of said output images.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
52 words
The signal processor as recited in claims 1 or 2, further comprising: means for estimating background noise intensity contained in said reduced resolution, rectangular output images; means for subtracting said background noise intensity from said output images to produce contrast images; and means for detecting said target embedded in said contrast images.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
32 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 9, wherein said detecting means comprises means for comparing said contrast images with an intensity offset to detect said contrast images greater than said offset.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
55 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 9, wherein said detecting means comprises: means for estimating a noise standard deviation for said contrast images; means for normalizing said contrast images with respect to said noise standard deviation; and means for examining said normalized contrast images to detect a global maximum to provide a forced-choice detection.
Claim 13
Independent Claim
92 words
A method for detecting a rectangular or nearly-rectangular target of known orientation in a digitized two-dimensional input image, wherein said target's size, aspect ratio and position in said input image are unknown, and wherein said target has minimum contrast relative to its background in said input image, said method comprising the step of generating a plurality of reduced resolution, rectangular images as output from said input image, said input image being generated by an imaging sensor comprised of an array of detector elements and having a higher resolution than said output images.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
92 words
A method for detecting a rectangular or nearly-rectangular target of known orientation in a digitized two-dimensional input image, wherein said target's size, aspect ratio and position in said input image are unknown, and wherein said target has minimum contrast relative to its background in said input image, said method comprising the step of generating a plurality of reduced resolution, rectangular images as output from said input image, said input image being generated by an imaging sensor comprised of an array of detector elements and having a higher resolution than said output images.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method as recited in claim 12, further comprising the step of preprocessing said input image to smooth and decimate in time the waveforms received from said detector elements and comprising said input image, prior to said generating step.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method as recited in claim 12, wherein said generating step comprises the step of averaging in a plurality of stages the waveforms comprising said input image and received from said detector elements, to generate at each stage a rectangular output image at a level of reduced resolution corresponding to said stage.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
90 words
The method as recited in claim 14, wherein said averaging step comprises the steps of: cross-channel averaging in a plurality of stages said waveforms, to generate at each stage a rectangular, cross-channel output image at a level of reduced cross-channel resolution corresponding to said stage; and in-scan averaging in a plurality of sections said cross-channel output images, each of said sections averaging one of said cross-channel output images in a plurality of stages, to generate in each section a plurality of reduced resolution, rectangular output images corresponding to said stages.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
55 words
The method as recited in claim 15, wherein said in-scan averaging step comprises the steps of: connecting sequentially a plurality of delay elements in each of said sections; and averaging the outputs of said delay elements in stages, to generate in each section a plurality of reduced resolution, rectangular output images corresponding to said stages.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method as recited in claim 16, wherein said averaging step comprises the step of producing an infinite-impulse-response approximation of at least one of said stages.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method as recited in claim 16, wherein said averaging step comprises the step of decimating in time said cross-channel output image in at least one of said stages.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
82 words
The method as recited in claim 12, wherein said generating step comprises the step of performing a mapping from said higher resolution input image to said reduced resolution, rectangular output images, wherein said performing step comprises the step of averaging the pixel values within a rectangular region of dimensions kxn in said input image, the upper-right-hand corner of said rectangular region being located at the (i,j)-pixel location in said input image, to obtain the (i,j)-pixel value in each of said output images.
Claim 22
Independent Claim
48 words
The method as recited in claims 12 or 13, further comprising the steps of: estimating background noise intensity contained in said reduced resolution, rectangular output images; subtracting said background noise intensity from said output images to produce contrast images; and detecting said target embedded in said contrast images.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method as recited in claim 20, wherein said detecting step comprises the step of comparing said contrast images with an intensity offset to detect said contrast images greater than said offset.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method as recited in claim 20, wherein said detecting step comprises the steps of: estimating a noise standard deviation for said contrast images; normalizing said contrast images with respect to said noise standard deviation; and examining said normalized contrast images to detect a global maximum to provide a forced-choice detection.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
21 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 1, wherein said output images are not reduced in dimensionality from said input image.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
49 words
The signal processor as recited in claim 1, wherein the processing gain of said signal processor is computable, with no more than about 10% maximum error, as G=ηN Pix 1/2 , where N Pix is the number of pixels occupied by said target in said input image and η=0.81.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method as recited in claim 12, wherein said output images are not reduced in dimensionality from said input image.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
48 words
The method as recited in claim 12, wherein the processing gain resulting from said method is computable, with no more than about 10% maximum error, as G=ηN Pix 1/2 , where N Pix is the number of pixels occupied by said target in said input image and η=0.81.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3604803A
Cited
US4692882A
Cited
US4821334A
Cited
US4805031A
Cited
US4823194A
Cited
US4893923A
Cited
US4853779A
Cited
US4864396A
Cited
US4853795A
Cited
US5027413A
Cited
US4912569A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-10-25 | 1997-04-26 | 1997-10-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-10-25 | 2001-04-26 | 2001-10-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-10-25 | 2005-04-26 | 2005-10-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |