← Back to Patent Explorer
US5233609A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Multichannel multiplexer with frequency discrimination characteristics

Assignee: General Dynamics Government Systems Corp
•
Filing: 1992-03-16
•
Granted: 1993-08-03
•
Expires: 2012-03-16
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A new class of multiplexing filter structure has both the properties of channelized filtering and channelized linear frequency discrimination. The channelized filter-discriminator is intended for use as part of a microwave receiving system possessing a high probability of intercept for incoming signals. The selective properties of the band pass filters provide an interference-reduction capability while the discriminator property provides for instantaneous frequency measurement. The design procedure for achieving a very high degree of discriminator linearity in association with a reasonable selectivity comparable to a maximally flat filter uses theoretical design data provided in a normalized table generated by computer optimization. A hardware realization of a 64 channel multiplexer-discriminator is described and measured data is presented that agrees very closely with the theoretical predictions.

Inventors

  • 👤 J. Keith Hunton

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-07 19:54
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01P; H01P1/00; H01P1/20; H01P1/213

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim 289 words
A multichannel multiplexing filter structure having the properties of channelized filtering and channelized linear frequency discrimination, for use in a microwave receiving system possessing a high probability of intercept for incoming signals, comprising: a plurality of individual, relatively narrow channels; each of said channels having an individual bandpass filter; a manifold transmission line comprising two manifolds, each manifold terminating in a matched load, and a power divider and by isolators isolating said manifolds; each of said channels being set by its bandpass filter coupled to said manifold transmission line such that the even and odd-numbered channels appear on separate manifolds, through a transformer within said bandpass filter allowing a percentage of its power to be coupled into its filter if a received signal frequency is in its passband; the remaining power being absorbed in said matched loads terminating said manifolds; each of said filters having four resonators of finite unloaded Q, the unloaded Q's of all resonators being the same; each resonator having two parameters, resonant reactance and resonant frequency, the latter being fixed at the center frequency of each channel; each of said bandpass filters having the values of its circuit parameters optimized to yield a bandpass response shape such that the ratios of the output levels of all pairs of adjacent channel filters are linear with respect to a straight-line law for dB vs. frequency in the frequency range between the center frequencies of said pairs of adjacent channels, each channel working with its higher and lower-frequency neighbors to produce this same result; and means to tune each filter to match the universal response with linear frequency scale of appropriate bandwidth within less than 0.05 dB over the required range `64 MHz` for an accurate discriminator law.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 289 words
A multichannel multiplexing filter structure having the properties of channelized filtering and channelized linear frequency discrimination, for use in a microwave receiving system possessing a high probability of intercept for incoming signals, comprising: a plurality of individual, relatively narrow channels; each of said channels having an individual bandpass filter; a manifold transmission line comprising two manifolds, each manifold terminating in a matched load, and a power divider and by isolators isolating said manifolds; each of said channels being set by its bandpass filter coupled to said manifold transmission line such that the even and odd-numbered channels appear on separate manifolds, through a transformer within said bandpass filter allowing a percentage of its power to be coupled into its filter if a received signal frequency is in its passband; the remaining power being absorbed in said matched loads terminating said manifolds; each of said filters having four resonators of finite unloaded Q, the unloaded Q's of all resonators being the same; each resonator having two parameters, resonant reactance and resonant frequency, the latter being fixed at the center frequency of each channel; each of said bandpass filters having the values of its circuit parameters optimized to yield a bandpass response shape such that the ratios of the output levels of all pairs of adjacent channel filters are linear with respect to a straight-line law for dB vs. frequency in the frequency range between the center frequencies of said pairs of adjacent channels, each channel working with its higher and lower-frequency neighbors to produce this same result; and means to tune each filter to match the universal response with linear frequency scale of appropriate bandwidth within less than 0.05 dB over the required range `64 MHz` for an accurate discriminator law.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 27 words
The multiplexing filter structure of claim 1, wherein said multiplexing filter structure covers the frequency range of 6.992 to 9.008 GHz with channel bandwidths of 32 MHz.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 96 words
The multiplexing filter structure of claim 1, wherein said optimized circuit parameters have been computed by an iterative process beginning with a lumped equivalent circuit representation of two adjacent channel filters, one on each manifold, selected from said channel filters of said plurality of channels, for analysis with respect to linearity of frequency discrimination, and a set of initial parameter values for the circuit elements of said equivalent circuit representation and sample frequencies at which peak error values are likely to occur for the frequency range between the center frequencies of said two adjacent bandpass filters.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 58 words
The multiplexing filter structure of claim 3, wherein said iterative process calculated the differential amplitude between a signal output of the first of said two adjacent filters and that of the second at the frequencies of the predicted error extreme, and computed an error result representing the difference between said differential amplitude and a straight-line law vs. frequency.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 42 words
The multiplexing filter structure of claim 4, wherein said iterative process computed the derivatives of said errors with respect to all optimizable parameters and with respect to frequency, and changed said initial parameter values to values predicted by said computed derivative values.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 57 words
The multiplexing filter structure of claim 5, wherein said iterative process was repeated until errors at said sample peaks were reduced and said sample peaks coincided with actual peaks in said error, such that the error in the frequency discriminator curve relative to a straight line law was a minimum equal-ripple value over the desired frequency range.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 27 words
The multiplexing filter structure of claim 6, wherein the results of said iterative process were applied to all pairs of adjacent filter channels in said multiplexing filter.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 24 words
The multiplexing filter structure of claim 7, wherein said iterative process terminated when the error vs. frequency has equal extreme of the value prescribed.
Claim 10
Independent Claim 379 words
A method for optimizing the parameters of a multiplexing filter having a plurality of individual channel bandpass filters appearing equally on two separate manifolds isolated by a power divider, with the properties of channelized filtering and channelized linear frequency discrimination, comprising the steps of: a. providing a lumped equivalent circuit representation of two adjacent channel filters, one on each manifold, selected from said plurality for analysis with respect to linearity of frequency discrimination; b. providing a set of initial parameter values for the circuit element of said equivalent circuit representation and sample frequencies at which peak error values are likely to occur for the frequency range between the center frequencies of said two adjacent bandpass filters; c. calculating, for all pairs of adjacent channel filters, the differential amplitude between the signal output of the first of any of said two adjacent filters and that of the second at the frequencies of the predicted error extreme; d. computing an error result representing the difference between said differential amplitude and a straight-line law vs. frequency; e. computing the derivatives of said errors with respect to all optimizable parameters and with respect to frequency; f. changing said initial parameter values to values predicted by said computed derivative values; g. repeating steps c, d, e and f until errors at said sample peaks are reduced and said sample peaks coincide with actual peaks in said error, such that the error in the frequency discriminator curve relative to a straight line law is a minimum equal-ripple value over the desired frequency range; h. applying the results of said previous steps to all adjacent filter channels in said multiplexing filter, thereby optimizing the values of the circuit parameters for each of said bandpass filters to yield a bandpass response shape such that the ratios of the output levels of all pairs of adjacent channel filters is linear with respect to a straight-line law for dB vs. frequency range between the center frequencies of said pairs of adjacent channel, each channel working with its higher and lower-frequency neighbors to produce this same result; and i. tuning each filter to match the universal response with linear frequency scale of appropriate bandwidth within less than 0.05 dB over the required range `64 MHz` for an accurate discriminator law.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 379 words
A method for optimizing the parameters of a multiplexing filter having a plurality of individual channel bandpass filters appearing equally on two separate manifolds isolated by a power divider, with the properties of channelized filtering and channelized linear frequency discrimination, comprising the steps of: a. providing a lumped equivalent circuit representation of two adjacent channel filters, one on each manifold, selected from said plurality for analysis with respect to linearity of frequency discrimination; b. providing a set of initial parameter values for the circuit element of said equivalent circuit representation and sample frequencies at which peak error values are likely to occur for the frequency range between the center frequencies of said two adjacent bandpass filters; c. calculating, for all pairs of adjacent channel filters, the differential amplitude between the signal output of the first of any of said two adjacent filters and that of the second at the frequencies of the predicted error extreme; d. computing an error result representing the difference between said differential amplitude and a straight-line law vs. frequency; e. computing the derivatives of said errors with respect to all optimizable parameters and with respect to frequency; f. changing said initial parameter values to values predicted by said computed derivative values; g. repeating steps c, d, e and f until errors at said sample peaks are reduced and said sample peaks coincide with actual peaks in said error, such that the error in the frequency discriminator curve relative to a straight line law is a minimum equal-ripple value over the desired frequency range; h. applying the results of said previous steps to all adjacent filter channels in said multiplexing filter, thereby optimizing the values of the circuit parameters for each of said bandpass filters to yield a bandpass response shape such that the ratios of the output levels of all pairs of adjacent channel filters is linear with respect to a straight-line law for dB vs. frequency range between the center frequencies of said pairs of adjacent channel, each channel working with its higher and lower-frequency neighbors to produce this same result; and i. tuning each filter to match the universal response with linear frequency scale of appropriate bandwidth within less than 0.05 dB over the required range `64 MHz` for an accurate discriminator law.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 24 words
The method of claim 9, wherein said multiplexing filter covers the frequency range of 6.992 to 9.008 GHz with channel bandwidths of 32 MHz.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4706239A Cited
US4855691A Cited
US4815075A Cited
US4839894A Cited
US4814727A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1996-08-02 1997-02-01 1997-08-03 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2000-08-02 2001-02-01 2001-08-03 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2004-08-02 2005-02-01 2005-08-03 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag