Patent US5229988A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5229988A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System and method for distinguishing proxy replies of interconnecting devices from duplicate source address replies of non-interconnecting devices on a network
Assignee: Agilent Technologies Inc
•
Filing: 1992-01-21
•
Granted: 1993-07-20
•
Expires: 2012-01-21
Abstract
Abstract System and method for distinguishing duplicate source address replies caused by interconnecting devices connected to a local area network and duplicate source address replies caused by non-interconnecting devices connected to the local area network. The present invention may be implemented through an analyzer. The method includes the following steps: In step 1, the present invention sends a first Address Resolution Request packet for a first Internet Protocol target address. In step 2, all Internet Protocol source address responses replying to the first Address Resolution Request packet are catalogued in a first reply set. In step 3, a second Address Resolution Request packet for a second Internet protocol target address is sent on to the network. In step 4, all Internet Protocol source address responses replying to said second Address Resolution Request packet are catalogued in a second reply set. In step 5, the first reply set is intersected with the second reply set resulting in an intersection set. In step 6, subtracting the first reply set from the intersection set to determine if there are any unique responders.
Inventors
- 👤 William R. Marbaker
- 👤 Scott Godlew
- 👤 Thomas S. Wisdom, Jr.
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 11:33
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04L; H04L43/00; H04L61/00; H04L61/09; H04L61/10; H04L61/103
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 17
Claim 1
Independent Claim
147 words
A method for monitoring a local area network and distinguishing proxy replies of interconnecting devices from duplicate source address replies of non-interconnecting devices, said method performed by a network analyzer device connected to the local area network, said method comprising the steps of: (1) receiving at least two reply packets having a duplicate source address; (2) sending a first packet having a first target address identical to said duplicate source address; (3) storing any reply packet responding to said first packet in a first reply set; (4) sending a second packet having a second target address, said second target address being in close address proximity to said first target address; (5) receiving a second reply set of zero or more reply packets in response to said second packet; and (6) determining if there are any unique reply packets not common to said first and second reply sets.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
147 words
A method for monitoring a local area network and distinguishing proxy replies of interconnecting devices from duplicate source address replies of non-interconnecting devices, said method performed by a network analyzer device connected to the local area network, said method comprising the steps of: (1) receiving at least two reply packets having a duplicate source address; (2) sending a first packet having a first target address identical to said duplicate source address; (3) storing any reply packet responding to said first packet in a first reply set; (4) sending a second packet having a second target address, said second target address being in close address proximity to said first target address; (5) receiving a second reply set of zero or more reply packets in response to said second packet; and (6) determining if there are any unique reply packets not common to said first and second reply sets.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
87 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said step (6) further comprises the steps of: intersecting said first and second reply sets to thereby generate a result; subtracting said result from said first reply set to thereby generate a further result; indicating that one or more proxy reply from an interconnecting device have been detected if said further result is equal to zero; and indicating that a duplicate source address reply of a non-interconnecting devices has been detected if said further result is not equal to zero.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said method further comprises the step of storing said second reply set before performing said step (6).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of continuing to monitor the local area network if there are no reply packets in response to said step (2).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said first packet is an Address Resolution Request packet.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said first target address is an Internet Protocol target address.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
16 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said second packet is an Address Resolution Request packet.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
17 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein said second target address is an Internet Protocol target address.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
139 words
A system for monitoring a local area network and distinguishing proxy replies of interconnecting devices from duplicate source address replies of non-interconnecting devices, said system comprising: (a) means for receiving at least two reply packets having a duplicate source address; (b) means for sending a first packet having a first target address identical to said duplicate source address; (c) means for storing any reply packet responding to said first packet in a first reply set; (d) means for sending a second packet having a second target address, said second target address being in close address proximity to said first target address; (e) means for storing any reply packet responding to said second packet in a second reply set; and (f) means for determining if there are any unique reply packets not common to said first and second reply sets.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
139 words
A system for monitoring a local area network and distinguishing proxy replies of interconnecting devices from duplicate source address replies of non-interconnecting devices, said system comprising: (a) means for receiving at least two reply packets having a duplicate source address; (b) means for sending a first packet having a first target address identical to said duplicate source address; (c) means for storing any reply packet responding to said first packet in a first reply set; (d) means for sending a second packet having a second target address, said second target address being in close address proximity to said first target address; (e) means for storing any reply packet responding to said second packet in a second reply set; and (f) means for determining if there are any unique reply packets not common to said first and second reply sets.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
98 words
A system according to claim 9, wherein said means for determining step further comprises: (i) means for intersecting said first and second reply sets to thereby generate a result; (ii) means for subtracting said result from said first reply set to thereby generate a further result; (iii) means for indicating that one or more proxy replies from an interconnecting device have been detected if said further result is equal to zero; and (iv) means for indicating that a duplicate source address reply of a non-interconnecting devices has been detected if said further result is not equal to zero.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
15 words
A system according to claim 9, wherein said means form part of a network analyzer.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
16 words
A system according to claim 9, wherein said first packet is an Address Resolution Request packet.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
17 words
A system according to claim 9, wherein said first target address is an Internet Protocol target address.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
16 words
A system according to claim 9, wherein said second packet is an Address Resolution Request packet.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
17 words
A system according to claim 9, wherein said second target address is an Internet Protocol target address.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-07-19 | 1997-01-18 | 1997-07-20 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-07-19 | 2001-01-18 | 2001-07-20 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-07-19 | 2005-01-18 | 2005-07-20 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |