Patent US5210536A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5210536A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Data compression/coding method and device for implementing said method

Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1991-08-07
•
Granted: 1993-05-11
•
Expires: 2011-08-07
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A device for adaptively encoding a flow of data symbols x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x t taken within a predefined symbol family, into a compressed bit string c(s), said method including so-called modelling operations (see Modelling Unit 60) whereby the numbers of times each symbol occurs in the flow are collected in a tree architecture denoting past flow symbols considered in a predefined order according to a reordering function f(t), and Relative Efficiency Counter (REC) facilities embedded in the growing tree nodes, and tracking REC variations for both optimal coding node determination and tree updating operations. The compressed bit string is then generated by an Arithmetic Coder (64) connected to said Modelling Unit (60).

Inventors

  • 👤 Gilbert Furlan

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-04 21:32
CPC Classifications
H; H03; H03M; H03M7/00; H03M7/30; H03M7/40; H03M7/4006

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim 235 words
An improved coding method for adaptively encoding a flow of data symbols x(t)=x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x t taken within a "d" long symbol family, into a compressed bit string c(s), said method including so-called modelling operations whereby the number of times or counts each symbol of the flow occurs, is collected in a tree architecture denoting past symbols of the flow considered in a predefined order according to a reordering context function f(t), said tree including at least one node (root) from which tree branches might be derived, said method being characterized by: providing each node with: "d" symbol counters respectively assigned to each symbol of the family and to be selectively incremented according symbol occurrences within the flow being currently processed ; a Relative Efficiency Counter (REC) to store the considered node efficiency, i.e. so-called difference of coding length, to coding versus parent node ; reading sequentially the flow of symbols ; searching for each currently considered symbol xt the optimal coding node, by climbing the tree and visiting successive nodes, based on said predefined order consideration, and up to an optimal coding node being the first decreasing REC node preceding a node with an increasing REC ; coding x t by feeding a so-called arithmetic coding device with the optimal node counts ; updating the visited node counts and extending the tree from the coding node.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 235 words
An improved coding method for adaptively encoding a flow of data symbols x(t)=x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x t taken within a "d" long symbol family, into a compressed bit string c(s), said method including so-called modelling operations whereby the number of times or counts each symbol of the flow occurs, is collected in a tree architecture denoting past symbols of the flow considered in a predefined order according to a reordering context function f(t), said tree including at least one node (root) from which tree branches might be derived, said method being characterized by: providing each node with: "d" symbol counters respectively assigned to each symbol of the family and to be selectively incremented according symbol occurrences within the flow being currently processed ; a Relative Efficiency Counter (REC) to store the considered node efficiency, i.e. so-called difference of coding length, to coding versus parent node ; reading sequentially the flow of symbols ; searching for each currently considered symbol xt the optimal coding node, by climbing the tree and visiting successive nodes, based on said predefined order consideration, and up to an optimal coding node being the first decreasing REC node preceding a node with an increasing REC ; coding x t by feeding a so-called arithmetic coding device with the optimal node counts ; updating the visited node counts and extending the tree from the coding node.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 32 words
An improved coding method according to claim 1, wherein said tree extension is subject to the double condition of current symbol count positive and decreasing REC being satisfied within said coding node.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 60 words
An improved coding method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said coding length is measured at any visited node Z(j) for current symbol x t through a so-called entropy measurement E(x.sub.t /Z(j))=-log(Pest x.sub.t) wherein, ##EQU12## wherein n(x t /Z(j)) is the Z(j) node count of symbols identical to x t , and Z(j) the sum of said node counts.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 16 words
An improved coding method according to claim 1 or 2 wherein said symbols are printed characters.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 16 words
An improved coding method according to claim 1 or 2 wherein said symbols are image pixels.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 25 words
An improved coding method according to claim 4, wherein said reordering context function is the so-called identity function whereby f(t)=1, 2, 3, . . .
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 22 words
An improved coding method according to claim 1 or 2 wherein said node efficiency to coding is tracked through REC derivative sign.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 27 words
An improved coding method according to any one of claim 1 or 2, wherein said node efficiency to coding is tracked through a thresholded REC variation contents.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 137 words
An improved coding method according to claim 7, wherein said optimal coding node search for each current x t , includes: searching whether said current symbol existed in the flow of past symbols considered in accordance with said reordering context function f(t), and should the answer to such symbo) searching test be negative, then performing the arithmetic coding operations prior to updating and extending the tree, otherwise, should the symbol searching test be positive, searching, through a so-called node existence test, whether an x t labelled node existed, and, in case of negative node existence test, switching to node creation operations, or otherwise, should the node existence test be positive, testing for REC variation, up to first decreasing REC node preceding an increasing REC node, said node being then considered as the optimal coding node looked for.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 45 words
A decoding method for decoding a bit string c(s) obtained by coding a flow of symbols according to 1 or 2, said decoding method including processing each decoded symbol for the so-called tree modelling operations for optimal decoding node detection through relative REC sign variation.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 45 words
A decoding method for decoding a bit string c(s) obtained by coding a flow of symbols according to 1 or 2, said decoding method including processing each decoded symbol for the so-called tree modelling operations for optimal decoding node detection through relative REC sign variation.
Claim 13
Independent Claim 219 words
A device for adaptively encoding a flow of symbols x(t)=x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x t individually taken within a "d" long symbol family, into a compressed bit string c(s), said device including a so-called Modelling Unit for performing modelling operations whereby the number of times each symbol of the considered flow of symbols occurs, is collected in a tree architecture denoting past symbols of the flow considered in a predetermined order according to a reordering context function f(t), said tree including at least one node (root) from which tree branches would be derived while feeding the successive symbols x t , said Modelling Unit feeding an Encoding Unit using so-called arithmetic coding techniques, said device being characterized in that said Modelling Unit includes: scheduler means for sequentially inputting the current symbol x t to be encoded ; Model Managing means sensitive to said scheduler means and including: means for assigning each generated tree node with "d" individual counting means and a so-called Relative Efficiency Counter (REC) ; testing means for testing existing tree architecture versus current symbol x t , starting with the root node and visiting selected nodes ; optimal coding node detection means sensitive to said testing means for detecting a so-called optimal coding node based on node REC variation testing.
Claim 14
Independent Claim 219 words
A device for adaptively encoding a flow of symbols x(t)=x 1 , x 2 , . . . , x t individually taken within a "d" long symbol family, into a compressed bit string c(s), said device including a so-called Modelling Unit for performing modelling operations whereby the number of times each symbol of the considered flow of symbols occurs, is collected in a tree architecture denoting past symbols of the flow considered in a predetermined order according to a reordering context function f(t), said tree including at least one node (root) from which tree branches would be derived while feeding the successive symbols x t , said Modelling Unit feeding an Encoding Unit using so-called arithmetic coding techniques, said device being characterized in that said Modelling Unit includes: scheduler means for sequentially inputting the current symbol x t to be encoded ; Model Managing means sensitive to said scheduler means and including: means for assigning each generated tree node with "d" individual counting means and a so-called Relative Efficiency Counter (REC) ; testing means for testing existing tree architecture versus current symbol x t , starting with the root node and visiting selected nodes ; optimal coding node detection means sensitive to said testing means for detecting a so-called optimal coding node based on node REC variation testing.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 41 words
A device according to claim 11, wherein said Modelling Unit further includes means sensitive to the optimal node individual counts and current symbol x t , for providing the Arithmetic Coding Unit with the required parameters including individual and cumulative counts.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 35 words
A device according to claim 11 or 12, wherein said optimal coding node detection means include means for detecting first visited node bearing a decreasing REC and followed by a node bearing an increasing REC.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 133 words
A device according to claim 13, wherein said testing means include symbol identifying means for identifying processed symbols considered in a reordered arrangement according to a predefined reordering function f(t) ; symbol existence testing means sensitive to said identified symbol for testing existence of said identified symbol within past processed symbols ; node existence testing means sensitive to said symbol testing means and to said symbol identifying means for testing the existence, within the current tree architecture, of a so-called son node as defined by said identified symbol; and, tree extension means including tree extension means including: node count sign testing means ; REC variation checking means ; whereby the considered tree is being extended through generation of a son node should said node count tested be positive and said REC be decreasing.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 21 words
A device according to claim 14, including REC thresholding means, whereby decreasing REC is being tested through thresholded REC sign test.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 20 words
A device according to claim 14, including REC derivative means, whereby decreasing nvc is being tested through nvc derivative sign.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4494108A Cited
US4652856A Cited
US4719571A Cited
EP0245621A2 Cited
US5025258A Cited
US5023611A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1996-05-10 1996-11-09 1997-05-11 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 2000-05-10 2000-11-09 2001-05-11 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2004-05-10 2004-11-09 2005-05-11 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag