Patent US5204826A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5204826A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Quality assurance of surface treatments by analysis of substrate surface line traces
Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 1991-02-01
•
Granted: 1993-04-20
•
Expires: 2011-02-01
Abstract
Abstract A quality assurance of surface treatments, typically with shot peening, by analysis of substrate surface line traces is disclosed. In particular, line traces are created over the surface treated substrate. These line traces are filtered with a low pass filter to create relative maximums. The coordinates of the relative maximums are determined and the spatial distance between these coordinates are measured and recorded. The actual plastic upset depth of the surface treatment substrate is determined. The surface treatment is then adjusted, if necessary, based upon the values of these spatial distances and actual plastic upset depths.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert A. Thompson
- 👤 Trent J. Markell
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 18:32
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01B; G01B21/00; G01B21/30
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 6
Claim 1
Independent Claim
172 words
A method of quality assurance for a surface treatment operation on a substrate, a system user having predetermined a desired total plastic upset depth of said surface treatment and a predetermined desired amount of surface treatment data to be omitted, said method comprising the steps of: recording a wavelength of predetermined area of said substrate which has been surface treated such that at least one line trace is recorded by a profilometer; filtering said line trace by a software filtering means to substantially eliminate said predetermined desired amount of surface treatment data to be omitted and to produce at least two relative maximums of data; determining coordinates of said relative maximums; recording said coordinates of said relative maximums; determining a spatial distance between said relative maximums; recording and/or displaying said spatial distance; determining an actual plastic upset depth; and adjusting, if needed, said surface treatment operation so that the actual plastic upset depth of a subsequently formed surface treated area should be more in conformance with said predetermined total plastic upset depth.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
172 words
A method of quality assurance for a surface treatment operation on a substrate, a system user having predetermined a desired total plastic upset depth of said surface treatment and a predetermined desired amount of surface treatment data to be omitted, said method comprising the steps of: recording a wavelength of predetermined area of said substrate which has been surface treated such that at least one line trace is recorded by a profilometer; filtering said line trace by a software filtering means to substantially eliminate said predetermined desired amount of surface treatment data to be omitted and to produce at least two relative maximums of data; determining coordinates of said relative maximums; recording said coordinates of said relative maximums; determining a spatial distance between said relative maximums; recording and/or displaying said spatial distance; determining an actual plastic upset depth; and adjusting, if needed, said surface treatment operation so that the actual plastic upset depth of a subsequently formed surface treated area should be more in conformance with said predetermined total plastic upset depth.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of quality assurance for a surface treatment operation on a substrate, according to claim 1, wherein said surface treatment is further comprised of the step of shot peening said surface of said substrate.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of quality assurance for a surface treatment operation, according to claim 1, wherein said recording is further comprised of the step of: directly recording said wavelength by means of an electromechanical profilometer means.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of quality assurance for a surface treatment, according to claim 1, wherein said recording is further comprised of the step of: directly recording said wavelength by means of an optical profilometer means.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of quality assurance for a surface treatment operation, according to claim 1, wherein said filtering is further comprised of the step of: filtering said line trace with low pass, software filter means.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-04-19 | 1996-10-19 | 1997-04-20 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-04-19 | 2000-10-19 | 2001-04-20 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-04-19 | 2004-10-19 | 2005-04-20 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |