US5204627A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Adaptive NMR angiographic reprojection method
Assignee: Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
•
Filing: 1991-03-14
•
Granted: 1993-04-20
•
Expires: 2011-03-14
Abstract
Abstract A magnetic resonance angiogram is produced by projecting a 3D array of motion sensitized NMR data. A mask which locates the vessels in the 3D array is produced by thresholding the NMR data, and this mask is combined with the 3D NMR data set to exclude signals produced by surrounding stationary tissues. An integration projection technique is used to produce the angiogram from the masked data set.
Inventors
- 👤 Charles A. Mistretta
- 👤 Frank R. Korosec
- 👤 David M. Weber
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 00:14
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R33/00; G01R33/20; G01R33/44; G01R33/48; G01R33/54; G01R33/56; G01R33/563
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
226 words
A method for producing a magnetic resonance angiogram, the steps comprising: acquiring a 3D NMR data set comprised of a set of values which indicates by their magnitude the translational movement of spins and which indicates by their location in the 3D NMR data set the physical location of said spins; producing a binary mask having a set of binary values in which there is a binary value corresponding to each value in the 3D NMR data set and the binary values are determined by a) locating regions in the 3D NMR data set in which the magnitude of its values exceed a first threshold value, b) enlarging those regions and c) setting the binary values in the binary mask which correspond to said enlarged regions to one of their binary values; combining the 3D NMR data set with the binary mask to produce a 3D adapted data set in which values in the 3D NMR data set which correspond to binary values in the binary mask located outside the enlarged regions are removed from the 3D NMR data set; and producing a 2D magnetic resonance angiogram from the 3D adapted data set in which a brightness value of each pixel in the 2D magnetic resonance angiogram is determined by the sum of all the data points therein that are disposed along the pixel's projection ray.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
226 words
A method for producing a magnetic resonance angiogram, the steps comprising: acquiring a 3D NMR data set comprised of a set of values which indicates by their magnitude the translational movement of spins and which indicates by their location in the 3D NMR data set the physical location of said spins; producing a binary mask having a set of binary values in which there is a binary value corresponding to each value in the 3D NMR data set and the binary values are determined by a) locating regions in the 3D NMR data set in which the magnitude of its values exceed a first threshold value, b) enlarging those regions and c) setting the binary values in the binary mask which correspond to said enlarged regions to one of their binary values; combining the 3D NMR data set with the binary mask to produce a 3D adapted data set in which values in the 3D NMR data set which correspond to binary values in the binary mask located outside the enlarged regions are removed from the 3D NMR data set; and producing a 2D magnetic resonance angiogram from the 3D adapted data set in which a brightness value of each pixel in the 2D magnetic resonance angiogram is determined by the sum of all the data points therein that are disposed along the pixel's projection ray.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method as recited in claim 1 in which the regions are enlarged by convolving each data point located within said regions with a kernel.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
86 words
The method as recited in claim 1 in which the binary mask is produced by: locating the regions in successive 2D slices of the 3D NMR data set in which the magnitude of the 3D NMR data set values exceed the first threshold value; enlarging those located regions in the plane of the 2D slice by convolving each 2D slice with a first kernel; and enlarging those located regions in the direction perpendicular to the planes of the 2D slices by convolving with a second kernel.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method as recited in claim 3 in which the first kernel has a center pixel and surrounding pixels, and the surrounding pixels decrease in value as a function of distance from the center pixel.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
78 words
The method as recited in claim 1 in which the brightness of each pixel in the 2D magnetic resonance angiogram is produced by combining the brightness value (S) as determined by the sum of all the data points in the 3D adapted data set that are disposed along the pixel's projection ray with a brightness value (MIP) as determined by the largest data point in the 3D NMR data set which is disposed along the pixel's projection ray.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method as recited in claim 5 in which the brightness value (S) is multiplied by a weighting factor (W) before being combined with the other brightness value (MIP).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
36 words
The method as recited in claim 5 in which the brightness values (S) and (MIP) are combined to produce the magnetic resonance angiogram pixel brightness value (MRA) as follows: MRA=(MIP+(W*S))/(W+1), where W is a weighting factor.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method as recited in claim 7 in which the weighting factor W is calculated as follows: W=30 (S-S.sub.min).sup.2 /(S.sub.max -S.sub.min).sup.2, where S min is the smallest value in the 3D adapted data set and S max is the largest value in the 3D adapted data set.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
95 words
The method as recited in claim 1 in which the first threshold value is determined by producing a first intensity histogram from data in the 3D NMR data set which includes both background data and vessel data, producing a second intensity histogram from the data in the 3D NMR data set which includes background data, and setting the first threshold value to the lowest intensity level which has less than a predetermined number of occurrences in the first intensity histogram and is greater than a maximum intensity level which occurs in the second intensity histogram.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USRE32701E
Cited
US4609872A
Cited
US4683431A
Cited
US5025788A
Cited
US5038784A
Cited
US5034694A
Cited
US5051697A
Cited
US5031624A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1996-04-19 | 1996-10-19 | 1997-04-20 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 2000-04-19 | 2000-10-19 | 2001-04-20 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2004-04-19 | 2004-10-19 | 2005-04-20 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |