Patent US5174946A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5174946A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Oscillation power monitoring system and method for nuclear reactors
Assignee: General Electric Co
•
Filing: 1991-01-22
•
Granted: 1992-12-29
•
Expires: 2011-01-22
Abstract
Abstract To detect core-wide and regional neutron flux oxcillations in a nuclear reactor core induced by thermal-hydraulic instabilities, local power range monitoring (LPRM) strings radially distributed throughout the core and having plural vertically spaced neutron flux detectors are locally assigned to individual oscillation power range monitoring (OPRM) cells radially distributed throughout the core. Groups of OPRM cells are assigned to different OPRM channels based on their geographical positions. Detector signals of the LPRM strings assigned to each OPRM cell are processed pursuant to a unique trip algorithm to detect neutron flux oscillations, and, upon meeting prescribed amplitude and frequency criteria, the assigned OPRM channel is tripped. Suppression of a thermal hydraulic instability is initiated when at least two OPRM channels assigned to geographically adjacent OPRM cells are tripped.
Inventors
- 👤 Glen A. Watford
- 👤 Kiran Kumar
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-04 21:36
CPC Classifications
G; G21; G21D; G21D3/00; G21D3/001; G21C; G21C17/00; G21C17/10; G21C17/108; G21D3/08; Y; Y02; Y02E; Y02E30/00; Y02E30/30
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim
186 words
An oscillation power range monitoring system for a nuclear reactor having a core including a plurality of vertically oriented fuel assemblies, said system comprising, in combination: A. a plurality of power monitoring strings radially distributed throughout said core in contiguous relation with said fuel assemblies, each said monitoring string including a plurality of neutron flux detectors arranged in vertically spaced relation; B. a plurality of oscillation monitoring cells radially distributed throughout said core, each said monitoring cell receiving detector signals from selected said detectors of those of said monitoring strings situated in the local vicinity thereof and providing a cell output signal representative of a combination of said detector signals received thereby; C. a plurality of oscillation monitoring channels, each assigned to a selected array of said monitoring cells; D. means for individually processing said output signals of said monitoring cells in repeating sequence to detect oscillations thereof and operating to trip the assigned ones of said monitoring channels when said oscillations indicate a thermal-hydraulic instability; and E. means for issuing an oscillation suppression function signal when at least two of said monitoring channels are tripped.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
186 words
An oscillation power range monitoring system for a nuclear reactor having a core including a plurality of vertically oriented fuel assemblies, said system comprising, in combination: A. a plurality of power monitoring strings radially distributed throughout said core in contiguous relation with said fuel assemblies, each said monitoring string including a plurality of neutron flux detectors arranged in vertically spaced relation; B. a plurality of oscillation monitoring cells radially distributed throughout said core, each said monitoring cell receiving detector signals from selected said detectors of those of said monitoring strings situated in the local vicinity thereof and providing a cell output signal representative of a combination of said detector signals received thereby; C. a plurality of oscillation monitoring channels, each assigned to a selected array of said monitoring cells; D. means for individually processing said output signals of said monitoring cells in repeating sequence to detect oscillations thereof and operating to trip the assigned ones of said monitoring channels when said oscillations indicate a thermal-hydraulic instability; and E. means for issuing an oscillation suppression function signal when at least two of said monitoring channels are tripped.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
30 words
The oscillation power range monitoring system defined in claim 1, wherein said detectors of each said monitoring string provide said detector signals to multiple said monitoring cells in contiguous relation.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
The oscillation power range monitoring system defined in claim 2, wherein each said monitoring cell provides at least two unique said cell output signals.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
45 words
The oscillation power range monitoring system defined in claim 3, wherein each said monitoring string includes at least four said detectors, said detector signals being combined in unique combinations depending on the vertical positions of said four detectors to provide said unique cell output signals.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
28 words
The oscillation power range monitoring system defined in claim 4, wherein said unique cell output signals of each said monitoring cell are assigned to different said monitoring channels.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
36 words
The oscillation power range monitoring system defined in claim 5, wherein each said monitoring cell receives said detector signal inputs from a unique group of said monitoring strings locally situated thereabout in a rectangular geometrical configuration.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
39 words
The oscillation power range monitoring system defined in claim 5, wherein said processing means includes a filter for removing components of said cell output signals of a frequency in excess of a characteristic frequency range of a thermal-hydraulic instability.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
67 words
The oscillation power range monitoring system defined in claim 5, wherein said processing means includes threshold detector means operating to trip one of said monitoring channels when an oscillation of one of said cell output signals includes a first peak of an amplitude exceeding a first setpoint immediately followed by a second peak of an amplitude exceeding a second higher setpoint occurring within a predetermined time window.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
44 words
The oscillation power range monitoring system defined in claim 8, wherein said threshold detector means further operates to establish said predetermined time window based on said oscillation further including a valley intermediate said first and second peaks having an amplitude exceeding a third setpoint.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
166 words
A method for monitoring thermal-hydraulic instabilities in a nuclear reactor having a core including a plurality of vertically oriented fuel assemblies, said method including the steps of: A. providing a plurality of power monitoring strings radially distributed throughout said core in contiguous relation with said fuel assemblies, each said monitoring string including a plurality of neutron flux detectors arranged in vertically spaced relation; B. assigning unique, contiguous geometrical groupings of said monitoring strings respectively to different oscillation monitoring cells; C. deriving an output signal for each said monitoring cell representative of signals issued by said detectors of said monitoring strings assigned thereto; D. assigning respective pluralities of said cell output signals to different oscillation monitoring channels; E. repetitively sampling said cell output signals; F. tripping a monitoring channel when the cell output signal assigned thereto exhibits an oscillation characteristic of a thermal-hydraulic instability; and G. indicating an existing thermal-hydraulic instability when at least two of said monitoring channels assigned to geographically adjacent monitoring cells are tripped.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
166 words
A method for monitoring thermal-hydraulic instabilities in a nuclear reactor having a core including a plurality of vertically oriented fuel assemblies, said method including the steps of: A. providing a plurality of power monitoring strings radially distributed throughout said core in contiguous relation with said fuel assemblies, each said monitoring string including a plurality of neutron flux detectors arranged in vertically spaced relation; B. assigning unique, contiguous geometrical groupings of said monitoring strings respectively to different oscillation monitoring cells; C. deriving an output signal for each said monitoring cell representative of signals issued by said detectors of said monitoring strings assigned thereto; D. assigning respective pluralities of said cell output signals to different oscillation monitoring channels; E. repetitively sampling said cell output signals; F. tripping a monitoring channel when the cell output signal assigned thereto exhibits an oscillation characteristic of a thermal-hydraulic instability; and G. indicating an existing thermal-hydraulic instability when at least two of said monitoring channels assigned to geographically adjacent monitoring cells are tripped.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
54 words
The method defined in claim 10, wherein each said monitoring string includes at least four detectors, said method further including the step of combining said detector signals of each said group of said monitoring strings depending on the positions of said detectors thereof to provide said output signal for said monitoring cell assigned thereto.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method defined in claim 10, wherein each said monitoring string is assigned to at least two geographically adjacent said monitoring cells.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
65 words
The method defined in claim 12, which further includes the step of assigning different groupings of said monitoring channels to at least two separate reactor protection systems, wherein each said monitoring channel grouping includes assigned monitoring cells located in geographically adjacent relation, and said indicating step indicates an existing thermal-hydraulic instability when at least one monitoring channel assigned to each reactor protection system is tripped.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
32 words
The method defined in claim 12, which further includes the step of initiating a reactor control function to suppress a thermal-hydraulic instability when at least two of said monitoring channels are tripped.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
43 words
The method defined in claim 14, which further includes the step of bypassing said reactor control function when the reactor is operating within predetermined ranges of either low power or high coolant flow conditions during which thermal-hydraulic instabilities of concern do not occur.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
70 words
The method defined in claim 12, wherein said tripping step includes 1) testing the amplitude of each oscillation peak of a sampled cell output signal against a first setpoint, 2) when each first setpoint is exceeded, testing the amplitude of each next oscillation peak against a second setpoint of a predetermined higher level than said first setpoint, and 3) tripping the assigned monitoring channel when said second setpoint is exceeded.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
64 words
The method defined in claim 16, wherein said tripping step further includes 1) establishing a first time window upon each instance said first setpoint is exceeded, 2) testing the amplitude of any immediately succeeding valley against a third setpoint, and 3) when said third setpoint is exceeded, establishing a second time window during which the next oscillation peak is tested against said second setpoint.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
69 words
The method defined in claim 17, wherein said tripping step further includes 1) filtering a sampled cell output signal to remove high frequency components uncharacteristic of thermal hydraulic instability, 2) integrating said filtered cell output signal to produce a time-averaged cell output signal, and 3) dividing said filtered cell output signal by said time-averaged cell output signal to produce a relative cell output signal for testing against said setpoints.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-12-29 | 1996-06-29 | 1996-12-29 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-12-29 | 2000-06-29 | 2000-12-29 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-12-29 | 2004-06-29 | 2004-12-29 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |