Patent US5166506A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5166506A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method for determining an imaging system focus error

Assignee: Eastman Kodak Co
•
Filing: 1991-01-30
•
Granted: 1992-11-24
•
Expires: 2011-01-30
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method for determining a radiation imaging system focus error, that employs a novel focus sensor. In a preferred embodiment, the novel focus sensor comprises two beamsplitters, a spacer, and three detectors comprising CCD arrays. The three detectors are constrained to satisfy radiation path length specifications, with respect to the beamsplitters and spacer. In the method, the focus sensor may be aligned in an unused portion of an imaging system radiation field. The detectors simultaneously image the same scene, sampling it at three different focus positions. The sampling action becomes a basis for generating a parabolic curve; a maximum of the parabolic curve is a measure of the imaging system focus error.

Inventors

  • 👤 Robert D. Fiete
  • 👤 Joel K. Mason
  • 👤 Philip F. Marino
  • 👤 Edward M. Granger

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 14:56
CPC Classifications
G; G11; G11B; G11B7/00; G11B7/12; G11B7/135; G11B7/1356; G02; G02B; G02B7/00; G02B7/28; G02B7/30; G02B7/32; G11B7/08; G11B7/09; G11B7/0908; G11B7/0917; G11B7/13

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim 444 words
A method for quantitatively determining an imaging system focus error, the imaging system inputting a scene radiation field and re-imaging it at an ideal focal point, the method comprising the steps of: 1) providing a sensor, the sensor including elements comprising: a) a first beamsplitter comprising an input scene radiation surface, and a first and second output surface; b) a second beamsplitter located to be in a radiation path generated by the first output surface of the first beamsplitter, and comprising an input radiation surface, and a first and a second output surface; c) a first radiation detector located to be in a radiation path generated by the first output surface of the second beamsplitter, and defining a first imaging surface located at a known radiation path length D 1 as measured from the input surface of the first beamsplitter; d) a second radiation detector located to be in a radiation path generated by the second output surface of the second beamsplitter, and defining a second imaging surface located at a known radiation path length D 2 , as measured from the input surface of the first beamsplitter; and e) a third radiation detector located to be in a radiation path generated by the second output surface of the first beamsplitter, defining a third imaging surface located at a known radiation path length D 3 , as measured from the input surface of the first beamsplitter; the elements so constrained that: D.sub.1 ≠ D.sub.2 ≠ D.sub.3 ≠ D.sub.1 ; 2) positioning the sensor in a portion of the input scene radiation field, and orienting the sensor so that the three radiation detectors each simultaneously image the same scene radiation field, for sampling it at the three different imaging surfaces; 3) sampling the input scene radiation field at the first, second and third imaging surfaces, for recording, respectively, data corresponding to the radiation intensity of the sampled field at different points on each of the three imaging surfaces; and 4) determining, from the recorded data, a value of a parameter representative of a statistical distribution of intensity vs. surface point position of the sampled field for each of the three imaging surfaces; b) generating a parabolic function of value of the parameter vs. imaging surface location by curve fitting to three points specified by the three imaging surface locations and the respective parameter values derived for the three imaging surfaces from step 4a; c) computing a location of an optimal imaging surface, corresponding to a maximum value of the parameter for the parabolic function, the computed optimal imaging surface location serving as a measure of the magnitude and direction of the imaging system focus error.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 444 words
A method for quantitatively determining an imaging system focus error, the imaging system inputting a scene radiation field and re-imaging it at an ideal focal point, the method comprising the steps of: 1) providing a sensor, the sensor including elements comprising: a) a first beamsplitter comprising an input scene radiation surface, and a first and second output surface; b) a second beamsplitter located to be in a radiation path generated by the first output surface of the first beamsplitter, and comprising an input radiation surface, and a first and a second output surface; c) a first radiation detector located to be in a radiation path generated by the first output surface of the second beamsplitter, and defining a first imaging surface located at a known radiation path length D 1 as measured from the input surface of the first beamsplitter; d) a second radiation detector located to be in a radiation path generated by the second output surface of the second beamsplitter, and defining a second imaging surface located at a known radiation path length D 2 , as measured from the input surface of the first beamsplitter; and e) a third radiation detector located to be in a radiation path generated by the second output surface of the first beamsplitter, defining a third imaging surface located at a known radiation path length D 3 , as measured from the input surface of the first beamsplitter; the elements so constrained that: D.sub.1 ≠ D.sub.2 ≠ D.sub.3 ≠ D.sub.1 ; 2) positioning the sensor in a portion of the input scene radiation field, and orienting the sensor so that the three radiation detectors each simultaneously image the same scene radiation field, for sampling it at the three different imaging surfaces; 3) sampling the input scene radiation field at the first, second and third imaging surfaces, for recording, respectively, data corresponding to the radiation intensity of the sampled field at different points on each of the three imaging surfaces; and 4) determining, from the recorded data, a value of a parameter representative of a statistical distribution of intensity vs. surface point position of the sampled field for each of the three imaging surfaces; b) generating a parabolic function of value of the parameter vs. imaging surface location by curve fitting to three points specified by the three imaging surface locations and the respective parameter values derived for the three imaging surfaces from step 4a; c) computing a location of an optimal imaging surface, corresponding to a maximum value of the parameter for the parabolic function, the computed optimal imaging surface location serving as a measure of the magnitude and direction of the imaging system focus error.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 29 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein step 2 comprises positioning the sensor so that one of the radiation detectors is located conjugate to the imaging system prime focus.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 21 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein the parameter determined in step 4 comprises a parameter representative of a variance magnitude.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 27 words
A method according to claim 1, wherein step 4 comprises determining the imaging system focal error in real time with the sensor in a single fixed position.
Claim 6
Independent Claim 255 words
A method for real time, automatic quantitative determination of distance and direction of displacement along an optical axis of the position of an in-focus image of an input scene radiation field focused by a radiation imaging system, from the position of a predetermined ideal focus point of the system, the method comprising the steps of: dividing the input scene radiation field into first, second and third scene radiation field paths using beamsplitters; simultaneously sampling the input scene radiation field along the first, second and third paths, using first, second and third radiation detectors defining first, second and third imaging planes respectively located at the ideal focus point, a distance epsilon ε short of the ideal focus point, and a distance epsilon ε beyond the ideal focus point; computing a value of statistical variance based on intensity of the input scene radiation field sampled at different points in the imaging plane for each of the first, second and third imaging planes; deriving a parabolic function of variance versus image plane location which fits the points defined by the values of statistical variance computed for each of the first, second and third image plane locations; and from the derived parabolic function, determining the distance and direction, from the first image plane location, of the image plane location that corresponds to the point of maximum variance on the parabolic function curve; the determined distance and direction representing the distance and direction of displacement of the position of the in-focus image from the position of the ideal focus point.
Claim 7
Independent Claim 255 words
A method for real time, automatic quantitative determination of distance and direction of displacement along an optical axis of the position of an in-focus image of an input scene radiation field focused by a radiation imaging system, from the position of a predetermined ideal focus point of the system, the method comprising the steps of: dividing the input scene radiation field into first, second and third scene radiation field paths using beamsplitters; simultaneously sampling the input scene radiation field along the first, second and third paths, using first, second and third radiation detectors defining first, second and third imaging planes respectively located at the ideal focus point, a distance epsilon ε short of the ideal focus point, and a distance epsilon ε beyond the ideal focus point; computing a value of statistical variance based on intensity of the input scene radiation field sampled at different points in the imaging plane for each of the first, second and third imaging planes; deriving a parabolic function of variance versus image plane location which fits the points defined by the values of statistical variance computed for each of the first, second and third image plane locations; and from the derived parabolic function, determining the distance and direction, from the first image plane location, of the image plane location that corresponds to the point of maximum variance on the parabolic function curve; the determined distance and direction representing the distance and direction of displacement of the position of the in-focus image from the position of the ideal focus point.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 47 words
A method as in claim 5, wherein the dividing step comprises dividing the field into the combined first and second paths and the third path using a first beamsplitter, and dividing the combined first and second paths into separate first and second paths using a second beamsplitter.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 35 words
A method as in claim 6, wherein the field is divided so that the first path comprises a transmission radiation path of the first beamsplitter, followed by a transmission radiation path of the second beamsplitter.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 48 words
A method as in claim 7, wherein the field is divided so that the second path comprises a transmission radiation path of the first beamsplitter, followed by a reflection radiation path of the second beamsplitter; and the third path comprises a reflection radiation path of the first beamsplitter.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 33 words
A method as in claim 8, wherein the field is divided so that the third path further comprises the reflection radiation path of the first beamsplitter, followed by a path through a spacer.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 26 words
A method as in claim 6, wherein the first beamsplitter has a reflection/transmission ratio of 33%/67%, and the second beamsplitter has a reflection/transmission ratio of 50%/50%.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 20 words
A method as in claim 5, wherein the first, second and third detectors comprise first, second and third CCD arrays.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 51 words
A method as in claim 5, wherein the second detector defines a second imaging plane located at 0.035 inches short of the ideal focus point along the second path, and the third detector defines a third imaging plane located at 0.035 inches beyond the ideal focus point along the third path.
Claim 15
Independent Claim 233 words
A method for real time, automatic quantitative determination of distance and direction of displacement along an optical axis of the position of an in-focus image of an input scene radiation field focused by a radiation point of the system, the method comprising the steps of: dividing the input scene radiation field into first, second and third scene radiation field paths using beamsplitters; simultaneously sampling the input scene radiation field along the first, second and third paths, using first, second and third radiation detectors defining first, second and third imaging planes respectively located at different first, second and third known distances from the reference point of the system; computing a value of statistical variance based on intensity of the input scene radiation field sampled at different points in the imaging plane for each of the first, second and third imaging planes; deriving a parabolic function of variance versus image plane location which fits the points defined by the values of statistical variance computed for each of the first, second and third image plane locations; and from the derived parabolic function, determining the distance and direction, from the reference point location, of the image plane location that corresponds to the point of maximum deviation on the parabolic function curve; the determined distance and direction representing the distance and direction of displacement of the position of the in-focus image from the position of the reference point.
Claim 16
Independent Claim 233 words
A method for real time, automatic quantitative determination of distance and direction of displacement along an optical axis of the position of an in-focus image of an input scene radiation field focused by a radiation point of the system, the method comprising the steps of: dividing the input scene radiation field into first, second and third scene radiation field paths using beamsplitters; simultaneously sampling the input scene radiation field along the first, second and third paths, using first, second and third radiation detectors defining first, second and third imaging planes respectively located at different first, second and third known distances from the reference point of the system; computing a value of statistical variance based on intensity of the input scene radiation field sampled at different points in the imaging plane for each of the first, second and third imaging planes; deriving a parabolic function of variance versus image plane location which fits the points defined by the values of statistical variance computed for each of the first, second and third image plane locations; and from the derived parabolic function, determining the distance and direction, from the reference point location, of the image plane location that corresponds to the point of maximum deviation on the parabolic function curve; the determined distance and direction representing the distance and direction of displacement of the position of the in-focus image from the position of the reference point.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4341953A Cited
US4540881A Cited
US4460989A Cited
US4633075A Cited
US4621191A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1995-11-24 1996-05-25 1996-11-24 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1999-11-24 2000-05-25 2000-11-24 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2003-11-24 2004-05-25 2004-11-24 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag