Patent US5165230A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5165230A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Apparatus for determining deterioration of three-way catalyst of internal combustion engine

Assignee: Toyota Motor Corp
•
Filing: 1991-11-15
•
Granted: 1992-11-24
•
Expires: 2011-11-15
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract An apparatus for determining a deterioration of a condition of a three-way catalyst arranged in an exhaust passage of an internal combustion engine, comprising an upstream O 2 sensor arranged in the exhaust passage upstream of the catalyst and a downstream O 2 sensor arranged in the exhaust passage downstream of the catalyst. An air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount is calculated in accordance with the output of the upstream O 2 sensor, and the rate of change of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount is decreased when it is determined that the condition of the catalyst has deteriorated.

Inventors

  • 👤 Nobuaki Kayanuma
  • 👤 Masayuki Sawano

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-31 18:37
CPC Classifications
F; F01; F01N; F01N11/00; F01N11/007; F02; F02D; F02D41/00; F02D41/02; F02D41/14; F02D41/1438; F02D41/1439; F02D41/1441; F01N2550/00; F01N2550/02; F01N2900/00; F01N2900/04; F01N2900/0422; Y; Y02; Y02T; Y02T10/00; Y02T10/10; Y02T10/12; Y02T10/40

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 33
Claim 1
Independent Claim 239 words
An apparatus for determining a deterioration of a condition of a three-way catalyst arranged in an exhaust passage of an internal combustion engine, said apparatus comprising: an upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means arranged in the exhaust passage upstream of the three-way catalyst for detecting an air-fuel ratio; a downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means arranged in the exhaust passage downstream of the three-way catalyst for detecting the air-fuel ratio; an air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount calculating means for calculating an air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount in accordance with an output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means; an air-fuel ratio control means for controlling the air-fuel ratio to a predetermined target air-fuel ratio on the basis of said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount; an engine running state determining means for determining whether or not an engine running state is a predetermined engine running state in which it can be determined whether the condition of the three-way catalyst has deteriorated; a reducing means for reducing a rate of change of said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount when said engine running state determining means determines that the engine running state is said predetermined engine running state; and a deterioration determining means for determining that the condition of the three-way catalyst has deteriorated by utilizing an output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means when said engine running state determining means determines that the engine running state is said predetermined engine running state.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 239 words
An apparatus for determining a deterioration of a condition of a three-way catalyst arranged in an exhaust passage of an internal combustion engine, said apparatus comprising: an upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means arranged in the exhaust passage upstream of the three-way catalyst for detecting an air-fuel ratio; a downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means arranged in the exhaust passage downstream of the three-way catalyst for detecting the air-fuel ratio; an air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount calculating means for calculating an air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount in accordance with an output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means; an air-fuel ratio control means for controlling the air-fuel ratio to a predetermined target air-fuel ratio on the basis of said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount; an engine running state determining means for determining whether or not an engine running state is a predetermined engine running state in which it can be determined whether the condition of the three-way catalyst has deteriorated; a reducing means for reducing a rate of change of said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount when said engine running state determining means determines that the engine running state is said predetermined engine running state; and a deterioration determining means for determining that the condition of the three-way catalyst has deteriorated by utilizing an output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means when said engine running state determining means determines that the engine running state is said predetermined engine running state.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 64 words
An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said deterioration determining means determines that the condition of the three-way catalyst has deteriorated when the number of reversions of the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means per unit time is larger than a predetermined number when said engine running state determining means determines that the engine running state is said predetermined engine running state.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 17 words
An apparatus according to claim 2, wherein said predetermined number is defined by a fixed constant value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 35 words
An apparatus according to claim 2, wherein said predetermined number is defined by multiplying a number of reversions of an output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means per unit time by a predetermined coefficient.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 138 words
An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount calculating means skips down said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount by a lean skip amount when an output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is switched from a lean side to a rich side, gradually decreases said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount by a lean integration amount when the output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the rich side, skips up said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount by a rich skip amount when the output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is switched from the rich side to the lean side, and gradually increases said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount by a rich integration amount when the output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the lean side.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 20 words
An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said reducing means reduces said lean skip amount and said rich skip amount.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 48 words
An apparatus according to claim 6, wherein said reducing means reduces said rich skip amount and said lean skip amount by multiplying said rich skip amount by a first coefficient and said lean skip amount by a second coefficient, said first and second coefficients being smaller than 1.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 16 words
An apparatus according to claim 7, wherein said first coefficient is equal to said second coefficient.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 18 words
An apparatus according to claim 7, wherein said first coefficient and said second coefficient are fixed constant values.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 17 words
An apparatus according to claim 7, wherein said first coefficient and said ;second coefficient are variable values.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 20 words
An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said reducing means reduces said lean integration amount and said rich integration amount.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 48 words
An apparatus according to claim 11, wherein said reducing means reduces said rich integration amount and said lean integration amount by multiplying said rich integration amount by a third coefficient and said lean integration amount by a fourth coefficient, said third and fourth coefficients being smaller than 1.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 16 words
An apparatus according to claim 12, wherein said third coefficient is equal to said fourth coefficient.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 18 words
An apparatus according to claim 12, wherein said third coefficient and said fourth coefficient are fixed constant values.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 17 words
An apparatus according to claim 12, wherein said third coefficient and said fourth coefficient are variable values.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 28 words
An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said reducing means reduces said lean skip amount, said rich skip amount, said lean integration amount, and said rich integration amount.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 70 words
An apparatus according to claim 16, wherein said reducing means reduces said rich skip amount, lean skip amount, rich integration amount, and lean integration amount by multiplying said rich skip amount by a first coefficient, said lean skip amount by a second coefficient, said rich integration amount by a third coefficient, and said lean integration amount by a fourth coefficient, said first through said fourth coefficients being smaller than 1.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 26 words
An apparatus according to claim 17, wherein said first coefficient is equal to said second coefficient, and said third coefficient is equal to said fourth coefficient.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 18 words
An apparatus according to claim 17, wherein said first coefficient through said fourth coefficient are fixed constant values.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim 17 words
An apparatus according to claim 17, wherein said first coefficient through said fourth coefficient are variable values.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim 66 words
An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount calculating means further comprises, a rich delay means for delaying an output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means switched from the lean side to the rich side, and a lean delay means for delaying the output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means switched from the rich side to the lean side.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim 28 words
An apparatus according to claim 21, wherein a rich delay time by said rich delay means is equal to a lean delay time by said lean delay means.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim 72 words
An apparatus according to claim 21, wherein a rich delay time by said rich delay means is increased relative to a lean delay time by said lean delay means when an output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the lean side, and said rich delay time is decreased relative to said lean delay time when the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the rich side.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim 77 words
An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount calculating means further comprises a skip amount control means for increasing said rich skip amount relative to said lean skip amount when an output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the lean side and for decreasing said rich skip amount relative to said lean skip amount when the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the rich side.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim 85 words
An apparatus according to claim 24, wherein said skip amount control means adds a first correction amount to said rich skip amount and subtracts a second correction amount from said lean skip amount when the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the lean side, and subtracts a third correction amount from said rich skip amount and adds a fourth correction amount to said lean skip amount when the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means in on the rich side.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim 26 words
An apparatus according to claim 25, wherein said first correction amount, said second correction amount, said third correction amount, and said fourth correction amount are equal.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim 58 words
An apparatus according to claim 25, further comprising a rich delay means for delaying the output of said down stream air-fuel ratio detecting means switched from the lean side to the rich side, and a lean delay means for delaying the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means switched from the rich side to the lean side.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim 77 words
An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount calculating means further comprises an integration amount control means for increasing said rich integration amount relative to said lean integration amount when an output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the lean side and for decreasing said rich integration amount relative to said lean integration amount when the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the rich side.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim 76 words
An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein it is determined that the output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the rich side when the output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is higher than a predetermined first reference value, and that the output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the lean side when the output of said upstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is lower than said first reference value.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim 46 words
An apparatus according to claim 29, wherein said first reference value is increased when an output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the lean side and is decreased when the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the rich side.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim 76 words
An apparatus according to claim 29, wherein it is determined that an output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the rich side when the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is higher than a predetermined second reference value and that the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is on the lean side when the output of said downstream air-fuel ratio detecting means is lower than said second reference value.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim 18 words
An apparatus according to claim 31, wherein said first reference value is lower than said second reference value.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1995-11-24 1996-05-25 1996-11-24 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1999-11-24 2000-05-25 2000-11-24 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2003-11-24 2004-05-25 2004-11-24 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag