US5124794A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Adaptive peaking circuit
Assignee: Zenith Electronics LLC
•
Filing: 1990-07-09
•
Granted: 1992-06-23
•
Expires: 2010-07-09
Abstract
Abstract A video system includes a scan converter for developing a progressively scanned display of video lines from a two field interlaced line system. A spatial array of six pixels covering two successive video lines is developed and gradients are determined between diagonally opposed pairs of pixels and a vertically opposed pair of pixels in the array. The interpolated pixel is developed by averaging the two pixels in the smallest of the gradients. A non-orthogonal display is developed by using horizontally interpolated pixels in the array developed by averaging successive pairs of real pixels, which introduces an offset of one-half pixel duration to the interpolated pixels. An adaptive peaking and noise coring circuit is included. Another spatial array of three line of pixels, both real and interpolated, is developed and a horizontal, a vertical and two diagonal gradients between pairs of pixels in the array are calculated. Logic circuitry and a maximum value decoder determine a peaking factor based upon the maximum gradient. A simplified adjustable noise coring circuit with symmetrical and asymmetrical peaking is also disclosed.
Inventors
- 👤 Khosro M. Rabii
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 17:05
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04N; H04N5/00; H04N5/14; H04N5/21; H04N5/20; H04N5/205; H04N5/208; H04N7/00; H04N7/01; H04N7/0117; H04N7/012
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
64 words
A method of operating a video processing system comprising: establishing a spatial array including video signals from three successive video lines in a display; calculating gradients between said video signals in horizontally, vertically and diagonally displaced sections of said spatial array; and peaking said video signal on the middle of said three successive lines as a function of the largest one of said gradients.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
64 words
A method of operating a video processing system comprising: establishing a spatial array including video signals from three successive video lines in a display; calculating gradients between said video signals in horizontally, vertically and diagonally displaced sections of said spatial array; and peaking said video signal on the middle of said three successive lines as a function of the largest one of said gradients.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 1 wherein said video signals are in pixel form and wherein said spatial array comprises a cluster of eight video pixels and wherein said gradients comprise differences between selected pairs of said eight video pixels.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
83 words
A peaking system for a video signal in pixel form comprising: means for developing a spatial array of video pixels including video pixels from three successive video lines; means for developing gradients between selected horizontally, vertically and diagonally displaced pairs of said video pixels in said spatial array; means for developing a peaking factor as a function of the maximum one of said gradients; and means for applying said peaking factor to peak a video pixel in the center of said spatial array.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
83 words
A peaking system for a video signal in pixel form comprising: means for developing a spatial array of video pixels including video pixels from three successive video lines; means for developing gradients between selected horizontally, vertically and diagonally displaced pairs of said video pixels in said spatial array; means for developing a peaking factor as a function of the maximum one of said gradients; and means for applying said peaking factor to peak a video pixel in the center of said spatial array.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
43 words
The system of claim 3 further including: line memory means for storing said successive lines of video pixels; means for delaying pixels from said line memory means to develop said spatial array; and logic means for determining the maximum one of said gradients.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
37 words
The system of claim 4 further including: summer means for supplying a peaked pixel output; means for inputting said center video pixel to said summer means; and means for inputting said peaking factor to said summer means.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
93 words
A video signal processing system comprising: delay means for establishing a spatial array of video pixels about a center pixel, said spatial array including three successive video lines; subtraction means for developing gradients between horizontally, vertically and diagonally opposed pairs of pixels about said center pixel in said array; logic means for determining the largest of said gradients; switch means controlled by said logic means for supplying said largest gradient as a peaking factor; and summation means supplied with said peaking factor and with said center pixel for developing a peaked video pixel.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
93 words
A video signal processing system comprising: delay means for establishing a spatial array of video pixels about a center pixel, said spatial array including three successive video lines; subtraction means for developing gradients between horizontally, vertically and diagonally opposed pairs of pixels about said center pixel in said array; logic means for determining the largest of said gradients; switch means controlled by said logic means for supplying said largest gradient as a peaking factor; and summation means supplied with said peaking factor and with said center pixel for developing a peaked video pixel.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
44 words
The system of claim 6 wherein said logic means further includes a plurality of comparators supplied with said gradients and a plurality of AND gates coupled to said comparators; and means coupling the outputs of said plurality of AND gates to said switch means.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-06-23 | 1995-12-23 | 1996-06-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-06-23 | 1999-12-23 | 2000-06-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-06-23 | 2003-12-23 | 2004-06-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |