US5095983A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Multiphase production evaluation method using thru-tubing, wireline packoff devices
Assignee: Chevron USA Inc
•
Filing: 1990-10-02
•
Granted: 1992-03-17
•
Expires: 2010-10-02
Abstract
Abstract A method for providing improved measurement of oil, water, and gas flow rates in producing wells using thru-tubing wireline inflatable and retrievable packers or plugs to systematically isolate producing zones within a wellbore. Surface flow rates are measured before and after zonal isolation, with the zonal production rate determined by the measured difference in flow rate before and after isolation. Surface measurement of individual production zones allows greater accuracy in measuring multiphase flows, while at the same time allowing evaluation of reservoir properties of the lower, isolated zones.
Inventors
- 👤 Charles F. Magnani
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-02 22:49
CPC Classifications
E; E21; E21B; E21B49/00; E21B49/08; E21B49/087; E21B33/00; E21B33/10; E21B33/12; E21B33/127; E21B43/00; E21B43/14; E21B47/00; E21B47/10; E21B43/34
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
193 words
A production evaluation method for measuring zonal production rates with said measurements being made at a surface location comprising the steps of: measuring natural well production rates and reservoir characteristics with perturbation of flow at the surface of a wellbore using a flow measuring means, said wellbore comprising more than one producing zone and an initial steady state production rate of a process fluid within said producing zone; isolating all fluid and blocking all fluid flow within a first wellbore production zone by a retrievable isolation means; measuring at the surface a total well production rate with said first zone isolated, and calculating a difference in production rates and reservoir characteristics with said first zone isolated, said difference in production rates prior to and after isolation representing a zonal production rate; repositioning the isolating means to isolate a next production zone and measuring the zonal production rate and reservoir characteristics for said next zone as the difference in well production rate and reservoir characteristics before and after said production zone isolation; repeating said steps of repositioning, isolating, and measuring of zonal production rates and reservoir characteristics for all production zones within the wellbore.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
193 words
A production evaluation method for measuring zonal production rates with said measurements being made at a surface location comprising the steps of: measuring natural well production rates and reservoir characteristics with perturbation of flow at the surface of a wellbore using a flow measuring means, said wellbore comprising more than one producing zone and an initial steady state production rate of a process fluid within said producing zone; isolating all fluid and blocking all fluid flow within a first wellbore production zone by a retrievable isolation means; measuring at the surface a total well production rate with said first zone isolated, and calculating a difference in production rates and reservoir characteristics with said first zone isolated, said difference in production rates prior to and after isolation representing a zonal production rate; repositioning the isolating means to isolate a next production zone and measuring the zonal production rate and reservoir characteristics for said next zone as the difference in well production rate and reservoir characteristics before and after said production zone isolation; repeating said steps of repositioning, isolating, and measuring of zonal production rates and reservoir characteristics for all production zones within the wellbore.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the isolating means is an inflatable retrievable packer.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the process fluid is a natural flowing process fluid.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
The method according to claim 1 further comprising an artificial lift mean for a low flow rate well wherein said artificial lift means provides a constant bottom hole reference pressure.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein the isolating means is a retrievable bridge plug.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method according to claim 1 wherein said process fluid is a multiphase process fluid.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
207 words
A production evaluation method for measuring zonal production rates with said measurements being made at the surface location comprising the steps of: measuring natural well production rates and reservoir characteristics with perturbation of flow at the surface of a well bore using a flow measuring means, said wellbore comprising more than one producing zone and an initial steady state production rate of a process fluid within said producing zone, said process fluid having more than one phase; isolating all process fluid within a first wellbore production zone, located at a lowest interval of said wellbore, by a retrievable isolating means comprising a thru-tubing inflatable packer; measuring at the surface a change in production rates and reservoir characteristics with said first production zone isolated, said change in production rates prior to and after isolating indicating a zonal production rate; repositioning said isolating means to isolate a next production zone adjacent to said first production zone by deflating said packer, moving said packer up the wellbore to said next production zone, and inflating said packer; measuring the zonal production rate and reservoir characteristics for said next zone; repeating said steps of repositioning, isolating, and measuring of zonal production rates and reservoir characteristics for all production zones within the wellbore.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
207 words
A production evaluation method for measuring zonal production rates with said measurements being made at the surface location comprising the steps of: measuring natural well production rates and reservoir characteristics with perturbation of flow at the surface of a well bore using a flow measuring means, said wellbore comprising more than one producing zone and an initial steady state production rate of a process fluid within said producing zone, said process fluid having more than one phase; isolating all process fluid within a first wellbore production zone, located at a lowest interval of said wellbore, by a retrievable isolating means comprising a thru-tubing inflatable packer; measuring at the surface a change in production rates and reservoir characteristics with said first production zone isolated, said change in production rates prior to and after isolating indicating a zonal production rate; repositioning said isolating means to isolate a next production zone adjacent to said first production zone by deflating said packer, moving said packer up the wellbore to said next production zone, and inflating said packer; measuring the zonal production rate and reservoir characteristics for said next zone; repeating said steps of repositioning, isolating, and measuring of zonal production rates and reservoir characteristics for all production zones within the wellbore.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method according to claim 7 further comprising the step of determining reservoir properties and formation communication of a lower production zone adjacent to a currently measured production zone, said determination comprising the measurement of reservoir properties and zonal deliverability of said lower production zone.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2751016A
Cited
US2945952A
Cited
US3103812A
Cited
US3083774A
Cited
US3371527A
Cited
US3439740A
Cited
US3905226A
Cited
US3876003A
Cited
US4535843A
Cited
US4803873A
Cited
US4759408A
Cited
US4905203A
Cited
US4928762A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-03-17 | 1995-09-16 | 1996-03-17 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-03-17 | 1999-09-16 | 2000-03-17 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-03-17 | 2003-09-16 | 2004-03-17 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |