Patent US1676957A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US5090734A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5090734A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for effecting evaluation of consumer goods by test panel members
Assignee: Frito Lay North America Inc
•
Filing: 1990-07-31
•
Granted: 1992-02-25
•
Expires: 2010-07-31
Abstract
Abstract In a method for effecting evaluation of consumer products by test panel members, the panel members receive a set of test materials which include an evaluation set of products, a video tape containing a video presentation of members of the evaluation set and means for ordering products free of charge. The choices made by the panel members provide information as to preferences between test products and established brands. The evaluation process is repeated over several cycles to provide information regarding long term purchase habits and product sustainability.
Inventors
- 👤 W. Richard Dyer
- 👤 D. Dennis Heard
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-01 16:20
CPC Classifications
B; B42; B42D; B42D15/00
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
245 words
A multi-wave method for effecting evaluation of consumer products by test panel members, comprising: A) selecting a plurality of test panel members to receive a first set of test materials from a test administrator; B) conducting a base wave by providing each test panel member with said first set of test materials, said first set of test materials comprising: 1) a base evaluation set of products, 2) a first video tape containing a video presentation on products in said base evaluation set, and 3) means for ordering at least one of the products in said base evaluation set; C) instructing each panel member to respond to the base wave by utilizing the ordering means to order at least one of said products in said base evaluation set; D) conducting a subsequent wave after conducting base wave (B) by providing each test panel member with a subsequent set of test materials, said subsequent set of test materials comprising: 1) a subsequent evaluation set of products; 2) a subsequent video tape containing a video presentation on each product in said subsequent evaluation set, and 3) means for ordering at least one of said food products in said subsequent evaluation set; E) instructing each panel member to respond to the subsequent wave by utilizing the ordering means to order at least one of said food products in said subsequent evaluation set; and F) recording in a data file the identity of products ordered by each test panel member.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
245 words
A multi-wave method for effecting evaluation of consumer products by test panel members, comprising: A) selecting a plurality of test panel members to receive a first set of test materials from a test administrator; B) conducting a base wave by providing each test panel member with said first set of test materials, said first set of test materials comprising: 1) a base evaluation set of products, 2) a first video tape containing a video presentation on products in said base evaluation set, and 3) means for ordering at least one of the products in said base evaluation set; C) instructing each panel member to respond to the base wave by utilizing the ordering means to order at least one of said products in said base evaluation set; D) conducting a subsequent wave after conducting base wave (B) by providing each test panel member with a subsequent set of test materials, said subsequent set of test materials comprising: 1) a subsequent evaluation set of products; 2) a subsequent video tape containing a video presentation on each product in said subsequent evaluation set, and 3) means for ordering at least one of said food products in said subsequent evaluation set; E) instructing each panel member to respond to the subsequent wave by utilizing the ordering means to order at least one of said food products in said subsequent evaluation set; and F) recording in a data file the identity of products ordered by each test panel member.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the base evaluation set comprises a set of market products.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the base evaluation set consists of a set of market products.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the subsequent evaluation set comprises a set of market products.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
22 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the subsequent evaluation set comprises a set of market products and a set of test products.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the subsequent evaluation set comprises market products.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of providing at least one sample product to the test panel member during the base wave.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 7 wherein the at least one sample product comprises a market product.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of providing at least one sample product to the test panel member during the subsequent wave.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 9 wherein the at least one sample product comprises a market product.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 9 wherein the at least one sample product comprises a test product.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1 wherein products in the evaluation set are designated by an identifying code and the ordering means comprises an automated telephone ordering system.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
27 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of providing each panel member with the food product ordered by that panel member from the evaluation set.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
12 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the test panel members comprise families.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 14 further comprising the step of recording product preferences of individual members of the families.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method of claim 1 which comprises a base wave and five subsequent waves.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the base evaluation set is comprised of about 30 to about 45 products.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
17 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the subsequent evaluation set is comprised of about 1-3 test products.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of collecting empty product packages from a test panel member and recording the identity of the package in the data file of the test panel member.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 19 wherein the recording step is effected with a bar code reader.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-02-24 | 1995-08-26 | 1996-02-25 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-02-24 | 1999-08-26 | 2000-02-25 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-02-24 | 2003-08-26 | 2004-02-25 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |