Patent US5079728A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5079728A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for quantitatively evaluating roll hardness
Assignee: Beloit Technologies Inc
•
Filing: 1990-01-31
•
Granted: 1992-01-07
•
Expires: 2010-01-31
Abstract
Abstract A method and apparatus for testing the hardness of wound rolls, such as paper rolls, which yields quantitative information which is reproducible from roll to roll and under various conditions of testing. The apparatus can be operated much like a backtender's stick, to simply strike the roll at a point where hardness is to be determined with a force variable between certain limits as determined by the operator using the stick. The apparatus includes an accelerometer mounted in a striker associated with circuitry for producing signals relating to (a) the energy of the impact between the striker and roll and (b) the peak deceleration of the striker. Those signals are processed to produce a roll hardness measure, which can be correlated to a commonly used Rho scale if desired, and which is repeatable irrespective of the force used by the operator to cause the impact.
Inventors
- 👤 Richard J. Adams
- 👤 Scott A. Baum
- 👤 David R. Roisum
- 👤 William K. Oliver
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 22:48
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N3/00; G01N3/40; G01N3/48; G01N3/30; G01N33/00; G01N33/34; G01N33/346; G01N2203/00; G01N2203/02; G01N2203/026; G01N2203/0262; G01N2203/0278; G01N2203/0282
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim
133 words
A hardness tester for determining the relative hardness of a material, the tester comprising, in combination; a striker for impacting the material with force which can vary within a prescribed range, and producing acceleration signal relating to the impact, first means for producing a first signal relating to the energy of the striker impact, said first signal relating to the force of the particular impact, second means for producing a second signal relating to the peak deceleration of the striker, and computer means for processing the first and second signals, such means using information derived from the first signal to correct the second signal, the result of the correction being a quantified output indication of the relative hardness of the material, the output being substantially independent of the force which produced the impact.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
133 words
A hardness tester for determining the relative hardness of a material, the tester comprising, in combination; a striker for impacting the material with force which can vary within a prescribed range, and producing acceleration signal relating to the impact, first means for producing a first signal relating to the energy of the striker impact, said first signal relating to the force of the particular impact, second means for producing a second signal relating to the peak deceleration of the striker, and computer means for processing the first and second signals, such means using information derived from the first signal to correct the second signal, the result of the correction being a quantified output indication of the relative hardness of the material, the output being substantially independent of the force which produced the impact.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
39 words
The combination as set forth in claim 1 wherein the computer means further comprises correlating means for correlating the quantified output to units of a predetermined hardness scale, and indicator means for indicating the material hardness in said units.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
19 words
The combination as set forth in claim 2 wherein the units of the predetermined hardness scale are Rho units.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
36 words
The combination as set forth in claim 1 wherein the striker comprises a hammer-shaped head affixed to a handle to produce a hand-held hammer-like device which can be wielded by an operator like a conventional hammer.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
19 words
The combination as set forth in claim 4 wherein the striker includes an accelerometer for producing the acceleration signal.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
36 words
The combination as set forth in claim 5 including threshold means associated with the acceleration signal having a threshold level below acceleration signals resulting from swinging of the hammer-like device, but to be exceeded upon impact.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
59 words
The combination as set forth in claim 1 further including housing means positioned for traverse across the material to be tested, means for mounting the striker within the housing means in a position juxtaposed to the material, and means for causing the striker to impact the material during traverse of the housing to take a plurality of readings therealong.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
40 words
The combination as set forth in claim 1 wherein the material is in roll form, and the hammer-like device is adapted for tapping along an axial line of the roll in an orientation substantially radial with respect to said roll.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
90 words
A method for determining and indicating the relative hardness of a wound roll, the method comprising the steps of: impacting the roll with a striker with a force which can vary within predetermined limits, determining the impulse force of the strike, determining the peak deceleration of the striker during the strike. combining information relating to the impulse force of the strike and the peak deceleration during the strike to determine a quantitative measure of hardness for the wound roll at the point of strike, and displaying the roll hardness quantity.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
90 words
A method for determining and indicating the relative hardness of a wound roll, the method comprising the steps of: impacting the roll with a striker with a force which can vary within predetermined limits, determining the impulse force of the strike, determining the peak deceleration of the striker during the strike. combining information relating to the impulse force of the strike and the peak deceleration during the strike to determine a quantitative measure of hardness for the wound roll at the point of strike, and displaying the roll hardness quantity.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the process further includes the step of correlating the quantitative roll hardness measure to a predetermined Rho hardness scale, and wherein the step of displaying includes displaying the roll hardness quantity in terms of said Rho hardness scale.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method as set forth in claim 10 wherein the method further comprises the steps of impacting the roll at a plurality of selected points with strikes which need not be of the same force, and computing comparable Rho units for each strike to produce a profile of roll hardness in Rho units which are comparable due to compensation for differences between the forces causing the respective strikes.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
41 words
The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the step of impacting further comprises swinging a hammer-shaped probe so that a hammer-shaped head of the probe impacts the roll in a substantially normal direction with respect to the roll surface.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method as set forth in claim 9 wherein the steps of determining comprise measuring the impact with an accelerometer.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method as set forth in claim 13 wherein the step of determining the energy of the strike comprises integrating the signal from the accelerometer with respect to time.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method as set forth in claim 13 wherein the step of determining the deceleration comprises detecting the deceleration signal from the accelerometer.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method as set forth in claim 14 wherein the step of determining the energy impulse force further comprises the step of imposing a threshold at a level sufficiently high to overcome accelerometer signals generated by swinging of the hammer-like device, but sufficiently low to detect accelerometer signals resulting from the strike.
Claim 19
Independent Claim
155 words
A method of profiling paper rolls comprising the steps of: a) providing a hammer-shaped probe containing an acceleration sensor, b) swinging the hammer-shape probed to impact the roll at a predetermined point to produce sensor signals relating to the deceleration of the probe resulting from the impact with the roll, c) processing the deceleration signals to produce a quantitative measure of the roll hardness at the impacted point which is substantially independent of the force of the impact, d) signalling to the operator whether the signals resulting from the impact were acceptable or unacceptable, e) repeating steps b-d at the last impact point if the result was unacceptable, f) storing the result of the measure of roll hardness for the impacted point if the result was acceptable, and g) repeating steps b-f at additional impact points to produce an automatically stored roll profile acquired by tapping of the roll along its length with the probe.
Claim 20
Independent Claim
155 words
A method of profiling paper rolls comprising the steps of: a) providing a hammer-shaped probe containing an acceleration sensor, b) swinging the hammer-shape probed to impact the roll at a predetermined point to produce sensor signals relating to the deceleration of the probe resulting from the impact with the roll, c) processing the deceleration signals to produce a quantitative measure of the roll hardness at the impacted point which is substantially independent of the force of the impact, d) signalling to the operator whether the signals resulting from the impact were acceptable or unacceptable, e) repeating steps b-d at the last impact point if the result was unacceptable, f) storing the result of the measure of roll hardness for the impacted point if the result was acceptable, and g) repeating steps b-f at additional impact points to produce an automatically stored roll profile acquired by tapping of the roll along its length with the probe.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
FR1001230A
Cited
US2737048A
Cited
US2834202A
Cited
US3425267A
Cited
US3425263A
Cited
US3540270A
Cited
US3822588A
Cited
US3879982A
Cited
US4034603A
Cited
US4534206A
Cited
US4542639A
Cited
US4615209A
Cited
US4856318A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1995-01-06 | 1995-07-08 | 1996-01-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1999-01-06 | 1999-07-08 | 2000-01-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2003-01-06 | 2003-07-08 | 2004-01-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |