Patent US5076698A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US5076698A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Sensing the shape of an object
Assignee: GERSAN ANSTALT
•
Filing: 1989-11-07
•
Granted: 1991-12-31
•
Expires: 2009-11-07
Abstract
Abstract In order to determine the external profile of a diamond, particularly a large diamond which has re-entrant features, an elongate and thin beam is projected onto the diamond while the diamond is rotated about an axis normal to the beam; an imaging system is used to image from one side the line along which the beam strikes the diamond, this image being formed on a diffraction grating which is tilted in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition and in order to employ the first order beam of the diffraction grating. The image on the diffraction grating is viewed with a second imaging system. Furthermore, there may be a substantial improvement in light capture. The arrangement is applicable to systems other than those for determining profile.
Inventors
- 👤 Martin P. Smith
- 👤 Robin W. Smith
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 09:00
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01B; G01B11/00; G01B11/24; G01B11/25; G01B11/2518; G01B11/2522
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 26
Claim 1
Independent Claim
138 words
A method of sensing the shape of an object, comprising: scanning or projecting onto the object an incident beam of radiation whereby the radiation, as seen in cross-section normal to the direction of propagation of the radiation, is elongate and thin, whereby the incident radiation lies substantially in a plane and strikes the object along a line; forming an image of said line on a directional screen, which is at an angle to the optical axis of light coming from the object, said angle being in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition, said optical axis being at a substantial angle to the plane of said incident radiation; and viewing the directional screen using an imaging system to form a final image, the directional screen being normal to the optical axis of the imaging system which forms the final image.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
138 words
A method of sensing the shape of an object, comprising: scanning or projecting onto the object an incident beam of radiation whereby the radiation, as seen in cross-section normal to the direction of propagation of the radiation, is elongate and thin, whereby the incident radiation lies substantially in a plane and strikes the object along a line; forming an image of said line on a directional screen, which is at an angle to the optical axis of light coming from the object, said angle being in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition, said optical axis being at a substantial angle to the plane of said incident radiation; and viewing the directional screen using an imaging system to form a final image, the directional screen being normal to the optical axis of the imaging system which forms the final image.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said optical axis of light coming from the object is aligned with the first order beam of the directional screen.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 1, wherein said object is a gemstone.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 1, wherein the directional screen is a diffraction grating.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
130 words
A method of sensing the shape of an object, comprising: scanning or projecting onto the object an incident beam of radiation whereby the radiation, as seen in cross-section normal to the direction of propagation of the radiation, is elongate and thin, whereby the incident radiation lies substantially in a plane and strikes the object along a line; forming an image of said line on a directional screen using a first imaging system whose optical axis is at a substantial angle to the plane of said incident radiation, the directional screen being at an angle to said optical axis which is in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition; and viewing the direction screen using a second imaging system, the directional screen being normal to the optical axis of the second imaging system.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
130 words
A method of sensing the shape of an object, comprising: scanning or projecting onto the object an incident beam of radiation whereby the radiation, as seen in cross-section normal to the direction of propagation of the radiation, is elongate and thin, whereby the incident radiation lies substantially in a plane and strikes the object along a line; forming an image of said line on a directional screen using a first imaging system whose optical axis is at a substantial angle to the plane of said incident radiation, the directional screen being at an angle to said optical axis which is in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition; and viewing the direction screen using a second imaging system, the directional screen being normal to the optical axis of the second imaging system.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 5, wherein the optical axis of the first imaging system is aligned with the first order beam of the direction screen.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 5, wherein the object is a gemstone.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 5, wherein the directional screen is a diffraction grating.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
72 words
A method of imaging an object parts of which are substantially further from an imaging system than other parts, the method comprising: forming an image of the object on a directional screen using means comprising a first imaging system in turn comprising a telecentric stop; and viewing the directional screen using a second imaging system whose optical axis is at a substantial angle to the optical axis of said first imaging system.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
72 words
A method of imaging an object parts of which are substantially further from an imaging system than other parts, the method comprising: forming an image of the object on a directional screen using means comprising a first imaging system in turn comprising a telecentric stop; and viewing the directional screen using a second imaging system whose optical axis is at a substantial angle to the optical axis of said first imaging system.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 9, wherein said first imaging system has a magnification other than unity.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 9, wherein the directional screen is a diffraction grating.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
148 words
A method of sensing the shape of an object, comprising: scanning or projecting onto the object an incident beam of radiation whereby the radiation, as seen in cross-section normal to the direction of propagation of the radiation, is elongate and thin, whereby the incident radiation lies substantially in a plane and strikes the object along a line; using a first imaging system to form an image of said line on a directional screen which is at an angle to the optical axis of said first imaging system, said angle being in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition, said optical axis being at a substantial angle to the plane of said incident radiation, said first imaging system comprising a telecentric stop; and viewing the directional screen using a second imaging system to form a final image, the directional screen being normal to the optical axis of said second imaging system.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
148 words
A method of sensing the shape of an object, comprising: scanning or projecting onto the object an incident beam of radiation whereby the radiation, as seen in cross-section normal to the direction of propagation of the radiation, is elongate and thin, whereby the incident radiation lies substantially in a plane and strikes the object along a line; using a first imaging system to form an image of said line on a directional screen which is at an angle to the optical axis of said first imaging system, said angle being in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition, said optical axis being at a substantial angle to the plane of said incident radiation, said first imaging system comprising a telecentric stop; and viewing the directional screen using a second imaging system to form a final image, the directional screen being normal to the optical axis of said second imaging system.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
11 words
The method of claim 12, wherein said object is a gemstone.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
16 words
The method of claim 12, wherein said first imaging system has a magnification other than unity.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
134 words
Apparatus for sensing the shape of an object, the apparatus comprising: means for scanning or projecting onto the object an incident beam of radiation which radiation, as seen in cross-section normal to the direction of propagation of the radiation, is elongate and thin, whereby the incident radiation will lie substantially in a plane and strike the object along a line; first imaging means for imaging said line along an axis at a substantial angle to the plane of said incident radiation; a directional screen, which is at an angle to said axis which is in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition; and a second imaging system having an optical axis normal to the directional screen, for forming an image of said line, whereby the latter image represents the shape of the object along said line.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
134 words
Apparatus for sensing the shape of an object, the apparatus comprising: means for scanning or projecting onto the object an incident beam of radiation which radiation, as seen in cross-section normal to the direction of propagation of the radiation, is elongate and thin, whereby the incident radiation will lie substantially in a plane and strike the object along a line; first imaging means for imaging said line along an axis at a substantial angle to the plane of said incident radiation; a directional screen, which is at an angle to said axis which is in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition; and a second imaging system having an optical axis normal to the directional screen, for forming an image of said line, whereby the latter image represents the shape of the object along said line.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
87 words
Apparatus for imaging an object parts of which are substantially further from the imaging system than other parts, the apparatus comprising: a directional screen; means comprising a first imaging system for forming an image of the object on the directional screen, the first imaging system comprising a telecentric stop; and a second imaging system for forming an image of the image on the directional screen, the optical axis of the second imaging system being at a substantial angle to the optical axis of the first imaging system.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
87 words
Apparatus for imaging an object parts of which are substantially further from the imaging system than other parts, the apparatus comprising: a directional screen; means comprising a first imaging system for forming an image of the object on the directional screen, the first imaging system comprising a telecentric stop; and a second imaging system for forming an image of the image on the directional screen, the optical axis of the second imaging system being at a substantial angle to the optical axis of the first imaging system.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
17 words
The apparatus of claim 16, wherein said first imaging system has a magnification other than of unity.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
178 words
Apparatus for sensing the shape of an object, comprising: means for scanning or projecting onto the object an incident beam of radiation which radiation, as seen in cross-section normal to the direction of propagation of the radiation, is elongate and thin, whereby the incident radiation will lie substantially in a plane and strike the object along a line; a directional screen; means comprising a first imaging system for forming an image of said line on the directional screen, the optical axis of the first imaging system being at a substantial angle to the plane of said incident radiation, and said first imaging system comprising a telecentric stop, the directional screen being at an angle to the optical axis of the first imaging system which is in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition; and a second imaging system for forming an image of the image on the directional screen, the second imaging system having an optical axis normal to the directional screen, whereby the image formed by the second imaging system represents the shape of the object along said line.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
178 words
Apparatus for sensing the shape of an object, comprising: means for scanning or projecting onto the object an incident beam of radiation which radiation, as seen in cross-section normal to the direction of propagation of the radiation, is elongate and thin, whereby the incident radiation will lie substantially in a plane and strike the object along a line; a directional screen; means comprising a first imaging system for forming an image of said line on the directional screen, the optical axis of the first imaging system being at a substantial angle to the plane of said incident radiation, and said first imaging system comprising a telecentric stop, the directional screen being at an angle to the optical axis of the first imaging system which is in accordance with the Scheimpflug condition; and a second imaging system for forming an image of the image on the directional screen, the second imaging system having an optical axis normal to the directional screen, whereby the image formed by the second imaging system represents the shape of the object along said line.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
13 words
The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the directional screen is a diffraction grating.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US751347A
Cited
GB1206668A
Cited
GB1251143A
Cited
GB1184633A
Cited
GB1379769A
Cited
GB1403557A
Cited
GB1405953A
Cited
GB1417466A
Cited
GB1416568A
Cited
GB1493861A
Cited
US3943278A
Cited
US4202630A
Cited
GB1513611A
Cited
GB1589176A
Cited
GB2001753A
Cited
US4168908A
Cited
US4336989A
Cited
EP0050144A1
Cited
GB2080712A
Cited
GB2081439A
Cited
EP0042361A1
Cited
EP0048346A1
Cited
GB2096793A
Cited
US4455087A
Cited
US4529305A
Cited
GB2103355A
Cited
EP0079439A1
Cited
US4705396A
Cited
US4630925A
Cited
US4564295A
Cited
GB2140503A
Cited
GB2144536A
Cited
EP0182469A1
Cited
WO1986007444A1
Cited
US4678324A
Cited
GB2186685A
Cited
EP0235941A1
Cited
US4758093A
Cited
GB2195178A
Cited
EP0278269A2
Cited
GB2203833A
Cited
GB2210452A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1994-12-30 | 1995-07-01 | 1995-12-31 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1998-12-30 | 1999-07-01 | 1999-12-31 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2002-12-30 | 2003-07-01 | 2003-12-31 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |