Patent US1272846A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US5073250A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5073250A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Staged catalyst reforming to produce optimum octane barrel per calendar day reformate production

Assignee: Chevron USA Inc
•
Filing: 1990-03-02
•
Granted: 1991-12-17
•
Expires: 2010-03-02
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A naphtha feed is contacted in a penultimate reforming stage under catalytic reforming conditions with a first catalyst. The effluent from the penultimate reforming stage is contacted in a final reforming stage under catalytic reforming conditions and at substantially the same pressure as is maintained in the penultimate reforming stage with a second catalyst. The reforming pressure is selected to provide optimal OB/CD production of product reformate of a desired RON from the final stage.

Inventors

  • 👤 Jules M. Kline
  • 👤 Stephen J. Miller
  • 👤 Bernard F. Mulaskey

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-02 20:50
CPC Classifications
C; C10; C10G; C10G59/00; C10G59/02

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim 193 words
A process for catalytically reforming feed hydrocarbons to produce a product reformate, in a multistage reforming operation, comprising: contacting the feed in a penultimate reforming stage under catalytic reforming conditions including a reforming pressure in a range from about 30 psig to about 350 psig with a first catalyst comprising a Group VIII metal dispersed on an inorganic oxide support; and contacting the effluent from said penultimate reforming stage in a final reforming stage under catalytic reforming conditions and at substantially the same pressure as is maintained in said penultimate reforming stage with a second catalyst comprising a noble metal dispersed on inorganic oxide support; and wherein said reforming pressure in said penultimate and final stages is selected to provide optimal OB/CD production of product reformate from said final reforming stage, wherein OB/CD is defined by the equation: ##EQU3## where IB=barrels of input naphtha to the reforming operation per operating day, LV %=liquid volume percent yield of C 5+ for the reforming operation, RL=the length of time between regenerations (or replacements), RgT=time needed to regenerate (or replace) both catalysts, FRON=the RON of the final stage C 5+ reformate, and PRON=the refinery pool RON.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim 193 words
A process for catalytically reforming feed hydrocarbons to produce a product reformate, in a multistage reforming operation, comprising: contacting the feed in a penultimate reforming stage under catalytic reforming conditions including a reforming pressure in a range from about 30 psig to about 350 psig with a first catalyst comprising a Group VIII metal dispersed on an inorganic oxide support; and contacting the effluent from said penultimate reforming stage in a final reforming stage under catalytic reforming conditions and at substantially the same pressure as is maintained in said penultimate reforming stage with a second catalyst comprising a noble metal dispersed on inorganic oxide support; and wherein said reforming pressure in said penultimate and final stages is selected to provide optimal OB/CD production of product reformate from said final reforming stage, wherein OB/CD is defined by the equation: ##EQU3## where IB=barrels of input naphtha to the reforming operation per operating day, LV %=liquid volume percent yield of C 5+ for the reforming operation, RL=the length of time between regenerations (or replacements), RgT=time needed to regenerate (or replace) both catalysts, FRON=the RON of the final stage C 5+ reformate, and PRON=the refinery pool RON.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 40 words
A process as set forth in claim 1, wherein the penultimate stage reformate octane is selected such that the run lengths between regenerations or replacements of said first and second catalysts in said penultimate and final stages are substantially equal.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 27 words
A process as set forth in claim 2, wherein the reforming pressure is selected to optimize the OB/CD production of final stage reformate of a selected RON.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 23 words
A process as st forth in claim 3, wherein the RON of the product reformate from the final stage is at least 100.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 23 words
A process as set forth in claim 3, wherein the RON of the product reformate from the final stage is at least 101.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 23 words
A process as set forth in claim 3, wherein the RON of the product reformate from the final stage is at least 102.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 34 words
A process as set forth in claim 3, wherein said second catalyst is tolerant to up to 0.5 ppm sulfur on a continuous basis and to periodic exposure to up to 100 ppm sulfur.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 32 words
A process as set forth in claim 3, wherein said first catalyst comprises platinum on alumina, silica/alumina or a zeolite and said second catalyst comprises platinum on an intermediate pore size zeolite.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 25 words
A process as set forth in claim 8, wherein said intermediate pore size zeolite comprises silicalite, ZSM-5, ZSM-11, ZSM-12, ZSM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-35, ZSM-38 or ZSM-48.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 16 words
A process as set forth in claim 9, wherein said intermediate pore size zeolite comprises ZSM-5.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 23 words
A process as set forth in claim 9, wherein said zeolite comprises silicalite with a silica to alumina ratio of at least 200.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 17 words
A process as set forth in claim 11, wherein said silicalite has less than 5,000 ppm alkali.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 23 words
A process as set forth in claim 9, wherein said zeolite comprises silicalite with a silica to alumina ratio of at least 500.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 17 words
A process as set forth in claim 13, wherein said silicalite has less than 5,000 ppm alkali.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

No citation records indexed.

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1994-12-16 1995-06-17 1995-12-17 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1998-12-16 1999-06-17 1999-12-17 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2002-12-16 2003-06-17 2003-12-17 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag