Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
258 words
Method for recognizing a target (T) among a plurality of n known targets Ti (with i=1,3,4, . . . , n), wherein: in a first preparatory step, for each of said known targets (Ti) first values (CKi) are determined representative of a plurality of p recognition criteria Ck (with k=1,2,3, . . . , p); in a second preparatory step, from direct examination of said n known targets (Ti), using said first values (CKi) and for each recognition criterion (Ck), nxp second values (PCk(Ti)) are established each representative of the probability for a target (Ti) to be recognized when it is examined whereas it is the target (Tj) which is examined (j=1,2,3, . . . , n); and in a step for recognizing said target: by direct examination of said target (T) to be recognized and from said first values (CKi) determined by said first preparatory step, at least p third values (pCk(Ti)) are established representative of the probabilities, for each recognition criterion (Ck), that the target (T) to be recognized is each of said n known target (Ti) insofar as each of said p criteria is concerned; said nxp third values associated with the same known target (Ti) are merged together by taking into account said nxp second values, so as to obatin n fourth values (p(Ti)), each of which is representative of the probability that the target to be recognized is one of the known targets (Ti); and the identity of the target to be recognized (T) is determined from the largest of said fourth values.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
258 words
Method for recognizing a target (T) among a plurality of n known targets Ti (with i=1,3,4, . . . , n), wherein: in a first preparatory step, for each of said known targets (Ti) first values (CKi) are determined representative of a plurality of p recognition criteria Ck (with k=1,2,3, . . . , p); in a second preparatory step, from direct examination of said n known targets (Ti), using said first values (CKi) and for each recognition criterion (Ck), nxp second values (PCk(Ti)) are established each representative of the probability for a target (Ti) to be recognized when it is examined whereas it is the target (Tj) which is examined (j=1,2,3, . . . , n); and in a step for recognizing said target: by direct examination of said target (T) to be recognized and from said first values (CKi) determined by said first preparatory step, at least p third values (pCk(Ti)) are established representative of the probabilities, for each recognition criterion (Ck), that the target (T) to be recognized is each of said n known target (Ti) insofar as each of said p criteria is concerned; said nxp third values associated with the same known target (Ti) are merged together by taking into account said nxp second values, so as to obatin n fourth values (p(Ti)), each of which is representative of the probability that the target to be recognized is one of the known targets (Ti); and the identity of the target to be recognized (T) is determined from the largest of said fourth values.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein merging of said third values is obtained by using mathematical laws given by any one of the theories which are BAYES inference, entropy maximum, the theory of evidence or the theory of fuzzy sets.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said third values are certain values.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
14 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said third values are uncertain values.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein, in said first preparatory step, said first values are recorded criterion by criterion for all said known targets (Ti), so that all said first values of all said targets corresponding to a criterion are grouped together.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein determination of said first values is achieved by direct examination of said known targets (Ti).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
23 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein determination of said first values is achieved from models or plans of said known targets.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein, in said second preparatory step, said second values are obtained by comparison of said first values with measurement of each of said targets in accordance with each of said criteria, said measurements being repeated numerous times.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
60 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein said second values are recorded in matrix memories (MC1 to MCp), each matrix memory being associated with a criterion and in each recording position (10.ji) of such a matrix memory the probability is recorded, for said criterion, that the target (Ti) is recognized whereas the target (Tj) is subjected to direct examination.