US4972193A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Target recognition
Assignee: The General Electric Company PLC
•
Filing: 1990-01-12
•
Granted: 1990-11-20
•
Expires: 2010-01-12
Abstract
Abstract Apparatus for recognizing a target such as a ship comprises a radar for successively sweeping the target to obtain input data representing the return amplitude from different target angles; a filter for selecting from the input data those significant ranges at which there is a significantly high amplitude; and a range difference compiler for identifying the frequency of occurrence of each of several range differences between pairs of the significant ranges, the most common range differences (expressed as a histogram) being representative of the distances between major reflectors on the target and thus distinctive of the target.
Inventors
- 👤 David E. Rice
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 11:24
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S7/00; G01S7/02; G01S7/41; G01S7/411; G01S7/412
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 15
Claim 1
Independent Claim
99 words
A method of recognising a target, comprising: successively sweeping the target with a range-finder to obtain input data representing the return amplitude at different ranges within the target and from different target angles within a bracket of angles; selecting from the input data those significant ranges at which there is a significantly high amplitude; and identifying the frequency of occurrence of each of several range differences between pairs of the significant ranges over the bracket of angles, the most common range differences being representative of the distances between major reflectors on the target and thus distinctive of the target.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
99 words
A method of recognising a target, comprising: successively sweeping the target with a range-finder to obtain input data representing the return amplitude at different ranges within the target and from different target angles within a bracket of angles; selecting from the input data those significant ranges at which there is a significantly high amplitude; and identifying the frequency of occurrence of each of several range differences between pairs of the significant ranges over the bracket of angles, the most common range differences being representative of the distances between major reflectors on the target and thus distinctive of the target.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
40 words
A method according to claim 1, comprising, immediately preceding the selecting step, the step of adjusting the input data to correct for target motion so that the said ranges are defined relative to a selected fixed part of the target.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 2, comprising tracking the target to obtain crude range data for the adjusting step.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
67 words
A method according to claim 2, wherein the adjusting step comprises using a correlation process to identify a subset of the input data representative of a major reflector on the target which is to constitute the said fixed part thereof, and, for each datum of the input data, correcting the range by subtracting from it the range of the said fixed part at the relevant target angle.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein the step of selecting the significant ranges comprises identifying, for each target angle, the ranges at which the amplitude exceeds a predetermined amplitude rank or threshold, those ranges constituting the significant ranges.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
37 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein the range is gated at a plurality of numbered range gates, and the frequency of occurrence is obtained of each of the possible numerical differences between the range gate numbers.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of comparing the said range differences with previously-stored reference data containing range difference information representative of potential targets, in order to identify the most likely target.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
21 words
A method according to claim 1 further comprising the step of storing the range differences to provide a target identification reference.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
89 words
Apparatus for recognising a target, comprising: a range-finder for successively sweeping the target to obtain input data representing the return amplitude at different ranges and from different target angles means for selecting from the input data those significant ranges at which there is a significantly high amplitude and means for identifying the frequency of occurrence of each of several range differences between pairs of the significant ranges, the most common range differences being representative of the distances between major reflectors on the target and thus distinctive of the target.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
89 words
Apparatus for recognising a target, comprising: a range-finder for successively sweeping the target to obtain input data representing the return amplitude at different ranges and from different target angles means for selecting from the input data those significant ranges at which there is a significantly high amplitude and means for identifying the frequency of occurrence of each of several range differences between pairs of the significant ranges, the most common range differences being representative of the distances between major reflectors on the target and thus distinctive of the target.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
34 words
Apparatus according to claim 9, further comprising means for adjusting the input data to correct for target motion so that the said ranges are defined relative to a selected fixed part of the target.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
12 words
Apparatus according to claim 9 wherein the range-finder is a pulsed radar.
Claim 14
Independent Claim
91 words
A method of recognising a target comprising: successively sweeping the target with a range-finder to obtain input data representing the return amplitude at different ranges within the target and from different target angles within a bracket of angles; adjusting the input data to correct for target motion so that the said ranges are defined relative to a selected fixed part of the target; selecting from the adjusted input data those significant ranges at which there is a significantly high amplitude., and indentifying patterns in the selected data characteristic of the target.
Claim 15
Independent Claim
91 words
A method of recognising a target comprising: successively sweeping the target with a range-finder to obtain input data representing the return amplitude at different ranges within the target and from different target angles within a bracket of angles; adjusting the input data to correct for target motion so that the said ranges are defined relative to a selected fixed part of the target; selecting from the adjusted input data those significant ranges at which there is a significantly high amplitude., and indentifying patterns in the selected data characteristic of the target.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4603331A
Cited
US3896434A
Cited
US4323880A
Cited
US4084148A
Cited
US4470048A
Cited
EP0100141A2
Cited
EP0239022A2
Cited
US4707697A
Cited
US4881079A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-11-19 | 1994-05-21 | 1994-11-20 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-11-19 | 1998-05-21 | 1998-11-20 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-11-19 | 2002-05-21 | 2002-11-20 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |