Method for evaluating and designing lenses

Claim 2

In a method of making a lens, including the steps of creating an initial lens design, and optimizing the design using a merit function, the improvement comprising the steps of: (a) defining a plurality of merit function components, each of which reflects a particular optical or manufacturing parameter, wherein one of said components reflects the manufacturability of aspheric surfaces, said manufacturability of said aspheric surfaces being evaluated based on the amount of aspheric bending in such aspheric surfaces; (b) computing a numerical value for each of said merit function components based on corresponding features of a preliminary design of said lens; (c) selecting weighting factors for various ones of said merit function components; (d) computing from said merit function components and said weighting factors an overall merit function value expressable in numerical terms that reflect both optical and manufacturing criteria; (e) successively varying at least one design feature of said lens and recomputing the resulting overall merit function value with each successive variation until the resulting overall merit function reaches a predetermined acceptable value; (f) obtaining the parameters of the optimized lens having said predetermined acceptable value for the resulting overall merit function; and (g) implementing said parameters to make a lens.

Claim 5

A method according to claim 2 in which aspheric bending is evaluated and/or controlled by using at least the following control function A: where ΔSAG is the difference in sag of the base sphere and the aspheric surface at a specific clear aperture.

Claim 6

A method according to claim 2 in which said merit function component reflects the manufacturability of a plurality of aspheric surfaces, wherein said aspheric surfaces are evaluated based on the amount of aspheric bending in said surfaces, said aspheric bending being related to the differences in a sag of the base sphere and the aspheric surface at a specific clear aperture of surfaces i and k according to the following formula: ##EQU9## where i is the aspheric reference surface, i is another aspheric surface in the optical system, where ΔSAG is the difference in sag of the base sphere and the aspheric surface at a specified clear aperture, and K k is a constant associated with k th surface.

Claim 7

A method according to claim 2 in which said merit function component measures a relative simplicity of overall design, said relative simplicity being related to an elemental surface weakness expression including a control function, which is determined by: ##EQU10## where N is the number of surfaces, CLAP i is the clear aperture of the i th surface of the known lens, R i is the radius of curvature of that surface, and D is a weighting factor that can assume positive, negative or zero value.

Claim 8

A method according to claim 2 in which said merit function component is based upon determination of ease of centerability of optical elements.

Claim 11

In a method of making a lens, including the steps of creating an initial lens design, and optimizing the design using a merit function, the improvement comprising the steps of: (a) defining a plurality of merit function components, each of which reflects a particular optical or manufacturing parameter, wherein one of said merit function components reflects the cost of glass of the entire system, said cost of glass is based on the following sequential steps: 1) calculating the sag of the surfaces of each optical element of the lens based on radii of curvature; 2) calculating the volume of a block of material that would be required to produce each such element based on: the aperture of the element, the element's thickness, and the sag of the element's surfaces; 3) calculating the weight of material block required for each element based on its volume and the weight of material per unit density; 4) calculating the price based on the weight of material block and the price of material per unit weight; 5) calculating the total material price by adding the price of material required for each element; (b) computing a numerical value for each of said merit function components based on corresponding features of a preliminary design of said lens; (c) selecting weighting factors for various ones of said merit function components; (d) computing from said merit function components and said weighting factors an overall merit function value expressable in numerical terms that reflect both optical and manufacturing criteria; (e) successively varying at least one design feature of said lens and recomputing the resulting overall merit function value with each successive variation until the resulting overall merit function reaches a predetermined acceptable value; (f) obtaining the parameters of the optimized lens having said predetermined acceptable value for the resulting overall merit function; and (g) implementing said parameters to make a lens.

Claim 12

In a method of making a lens, including the steps of creating an initial lens design, and optimizing the design using a merit function, the improvement comprising the steps of: (a) defining a plurality of merit function components, each of which reflects a particular optical or manufacturing parameter, wherein one of said merit function components reflects the cost of glass of the entire system, said cost of glass is based on the following sequential steps: 1) calculating the sag of the surfaces of each optical element of the lens based on radii of curvature; 2) calculating the volume of a block of material that would be required to produce each such element based on: the aperture of the element, the element's thickness, and the sag of the element's surfaces; 3) calculating the weight of material block required for each element based on its volume and the weight of material per unit density; 4) calculating the price based on the weight of material block and the price of material per unit weight; 5) calculating the total material price by adding the price of material required for each element; (b) computing a numerical value for each of said merit function components based on corresponding features of a preliminary design of said lens; (c) selecting weighting factors for various ones of said merit function components; (d) computing from said merit function components and said weighting factors an overall merit function value expressable in numerical terms that reflect both optical and manufacturing criteria; (e) successively varying at least one design feature of said lens and recomputing the resulting overall merit function value with each successive variation until the resulting overall merit function reaches a predetermined acceptable value; (f) obtaining the parameters of the optimized lens having said predetermined acceptable value for the resulting overall merit function; and (g) implementing said parameters to make a lens.

Claim 15

In a method of making a lens, including the steps of creating an initial lens design, and optimizing the design using a merit function, the improvement comprising the steps of: (a) defining a plurality of merit function components, each of which reflects a particular optical or manufacturing parameter, wherein one of said merit function components reflects ease of centerability of the lens elements in the optical system; (b) computing a numerical value for each of said merit function components based on corresponding features of a preliminary design of said lens; (c) selecting weighting factors for various ones of said merit function components; (d) computing from said merit function components and said weighting factors an overall merit function value expressable in numerical terms that reflect both optical and manufacturing criteria; (e) successively varying at least one design feature of said lens and recomputing the resulting overall merit function value with each successive variation until the resulting overall merit function reaches a predetermined acceptable value; (f) obtaining the parameters of the optimized lens having said predetermined acceptable value for the resulting overall merit function; and (g) implementing said parameters to make a lens.

Claim 16

In a method of making a lens, including the steps of creating an initial lens design, and optimizing the design using a merit function, the improvement comprising the steps of: (a) defining a plurality of merit function components, each of which reflects a particular optical or manufacturing parameter, wherein one of said merit function components reflects ease of centerability of the lens elements in the optical system; (b) computing a numerical value for each of said merit function components based on corresponding features of a preliminary design of said lens; (c) selecting weighting factors for various ones of said merit function components; (d) computing from said merit function components and said weighting factors an overall merit function value expressable in numerical terms that reflect both optical and manufacturing criteria; (e) successively varying at least one design feature of said lens and recomputing the resulting overall merit function value with each successive variation until the resulting overall merit function reaches a predetermined acceptable value; (f) obtaining the parameters of the optimized lens having said predetermined acceptable value for the resulting overall merit function; and (g) implementing said parameters to make a lens.

Claim 19

A method according to claim 10 or 11 in which said determination of ease of centerability of the optical system includes: (1) computation of the ratio of the surface clear aperture to four times its radius of curvature, said computation being performed for both front and back surfaces of all of said elements in the optical system. (2) computation of the absolute value of the difference between said ratio of the front surface and the said ratio of the rear surface for all of said elements in the optical system.

Claim 20

In a method of making a lens, including the steps of creating an initial lens design, and optimizing the design using a merit function, the improvement comprising the steps of: (a) defining a plurality of merit function components, each of which reflects a particular optical or manufacturing parameter, wherein one of said merit function components is relative simplicity of overall design which is related to an elemental surface weakness; (b) computing a numerical value for each of said merit function components based on corresponding features of a preliminary design of said lens; (c) selecting weighting factors for various ones of said merit function components; (d) computing from said merit function components and said weighting factors an overall merit function value expressable in numerical terms that reflect both optical and manufacturing criteria; (e) successively varying at least one design feature of said lens and recomputing the resulting overall merit function value with each successive variation until the resulting overall merit function reaches a predetermined acceptable value; (f) obtaining the parameters of the optimized lens having said predetermined acceptable value for the resulting overall merit function; and (g) implementing said parameters to make a lens.

Claim 21

In a method of making a lens, including the steps of creating an initial lens design, and optimizing the design using a merit function, the improvement comprising the steps of: (a) defining a plurality of merit function components, each of which reflects a particular optical or manufacturing parameter, wherein one of said merit function components is relative simplicity of overall design which is related to an elemental surface weakness; (b) computing a numerical value for each of said merit function components based on corresponding features of a preliminary design of said lens; (c) selecting weighting factors for various ones of said merit function components; (d) computing from said merit function components and said weighting factors an overall merit function value expressable in numerical terms that reflect both optical and manufacturing criteria; (e) successively varying at least one design feature of said lens and recomputing the resulting overall merit function value with each successive variation until the resulting overall merit function reaches a predetermined acceptable value; (f) obtaining the parameters of the optimized lens having said predetermined acceptable value for the resulting overall merit function; and (g) implementing said parameters to make a lens.

Claim 24

A method according to claim 13 or 14 in which relative simplicity of an overall design is related to an elemental surface weakness expression including a control function W, which is determined by: ##EQU12## where D i =weighting factors associated with a particular surface, N=the number of surfaces, CLAP i =are the clear apertures of known lens and, R i =radii of curvature.

Claim 25

A method according to claim 13 or 14 in which relative complexity of the system can be reduced by minimizing the following control function W, where: ##EQU13## where N=the number of surfaces, CLAP i =are the clear apertures of known lens and, R i =radii of curvature.