Patent US5049832A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US5049832A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Amplifier linearization by adaptive predistortion

Assignee: Commscope Technologies LLC
•
Filing: 1990-04-20
•
Granted: 1991-09-17
•
Expires: 2010-04-20
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method of linearizing an amplifier to produce an amplified output sample v a in response to a predistorted input sample v d derived from an input modulation sample v m , such that v a ≃Kv m , where K is the amplifier's desired constant amplitude gain. The squared magnitude x m of the input modulation sample v m is first derived. A table entry F i is then selected from a table containing N t values F i where i=0, 1, . . . N t -1. Each table entry corresponds to a squared magnitude value x mi ; and, for each table entry, F i G(x mi |F i | 2 )≃K, where G(x) is the complex gain of the amplifier. The table entry selected is the one for which the absolute value |x m -x mi | is minimized with respect to the table index i. The predistorted sample v d is then derived, in rectangular coordinates, as v d =v m F i , viz: Re(v.sub.d)=Re(v.sub.m)Re(F.sub.i)-Im(V.sub.m)Im(F.sub.i) Im(v.sub.d)=Re(v.sub.m)Im(F.sub.i)+Im(V.sub.m)Re(F.sub.i) where Re(x) is the real component of x and Im(x) is the imaginary component of x.

Inventors

  • 👤 James K. Cavers

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-27 07:24
CPC Classifications
H; H03; H03F; H03F1/00; H03F1/32; H03F1/3241; H03F1/3247; H03F2200/00; H03F2200/57; H03F2201/00; H03F2201/32; H03F2201/3233

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim 215 words
A method of linearizing an amplifier to produce an amplified output sample v a in response to a predistorted input sample v d derived from an input modulation sample v m , such that v a ≃Kv m , where K is the desired constant amplitude gain of said amplifier, said method comprising the steps of: (a) deriving the squared magnitude x m of said input modulation sample v m ; (b) selecting, from a table containing N t values F i where i=0, 1, . . . , N t -1, each of said entries corresponding to a squared magnitude values x mi , and for each of which entries F i G(x mi )|F i | 2 )≃K where G(x) is the complex gain of said amplifier, a table entry F i for which x mi is: (i) the largest table entry less than or equal to x m ; or, (ii) the smallest table entry greater than or equal to x m ; (c) deriving said predistorted sample v d as v d =v m F i in rectangular coordinates, viz: Re(v.sub.d)=Re(v.sub.m)Re(F.sub.i)-Im(V.sub.m)Im(F.sub.i) Im(v.sub.d)=Re(v.sub.m)Im(F.sub.i)+Im(V.sub.m)Re(F.sub.i) where Re(x) is the real component of x and Im(x) is the imaginary component of x; and, (d) driving said amplifier with said predistorted input sample v d .
Claim 2
Independent Claim 215 words
A method of linearizing an amplifier to produce an amplified output sample v a in response to a predistorted input sample v d derived from an input modulation sample v m , such that v a ≃Kv m , where K is the desired constant amplitude gain of said amplifier, said method comprising the steps of: (a) deriving the squared magnitude x m of said input modulation sample v m ; (b) selecting, from a table containing N t values F i where i=0, 1, . . . , N t -1, each of said entries corresponding to a squared magnitude values x mi , and for each of which entries F i G(x mi )|F i | 2 )≃K where G(x) is the complex gain of said amplifier, a table entry F i for which x mi is: (i) the largest table entry less than or equal to x m ; or, (ii) the smallest table entry greater than or equal to x m ; (c) deriving said predistorted sample v d as v d =v m F i in rectangular coordinates, viz: Re(v.sub.d)=Re(v.sub.m)Re(F.sub.i)-Im(V.sub.m)Im(F.sub.i) Im(v.sub.d)=Re(v.sub.m)Im(F.sub.i)+Im(V.sub.m)Re(F.sub.i) where Re(x) is the real component of x and Im(x) is the imaginary component of x; and, (d) driving said amplifier with said predistorted input sample v d .
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 111 words
A method as defined in claim 1, further comprising sequentially repeating each of said steps k times and, after each derivation of said predistorted sample v d (k), performing the further steps of: (a) deriving a sample v a (k) of said amplifier's output; (b) deriving an error sample e(k)=(v a (k)-Kv m (k)v m * (k) (c) deriving an adjusted value F i (k+1) of the table entry F i (k) selected during the k th selecting step, where: ##EQU13## where α is an appropriately chosen constant; (d) replacing said table entry F i (k) with said adjusted value F i (k+1); and, (e) sequentially repeating all of said steps.
Claim 4
Independent Claim 261 words
A method of linearizing an amplifier to produce an amplified output sample v a (k) in response to a predistorted input sample v d (k) derived from an input modulation sample v m (k), such that v a (k)≃Kv m (k), where K is the desired constant amplitude gain of said amplifier and k denotes the k th such samples, said method comprising the steps of: (a) deriving the squared magnitude x m (k) of said input modulation sample v m (k); (b) selecting, from a table of N t entitles F i where i=0, 1, . . . , N t -1, each of said entries containing a squared magnitude value x mi , and for each of which entries F i G(x mi )|F i | 2 )≃K where G(x) is the complex gain of said amplifier, a table entry F i (x m (k)) for which x mi is: (i) the largest table entry less than or equal to x m (k); or, (ii) the smallest table entry greater than or equal to x m (k); (c) deriving said predistorted sample v d (k) as v d (k) = v m (k)F i (x m (k)) in rectangular coordinates, viz: Re(v.sub.d (k))=Re(v.sub.m (k))Re(F.sub.i (k))-Im(v.sub.m (k))Im (F.sub.i (x.sub.m (k))) Im(v.sub.d (k))=Re(v.sub.m (k))Im(F.sub.i (x.sub.m (k)))+Im(vhd m( k))Re(F.sub.i (x.sub.m (k))) where Re(x) is the real component of x and Im(x) is the imaginary component of x; (d) driving said amplifier with said predetermined input sample v d (k); (e) incrementing k by 1; and, (f) sequentially repeating steps (a) through (e).
Claim 5
Independent Claim 261 words
A method of linearizing an amplifier to produce an amplified output sample v a (k) in response to a predistorted input sample v d (k) derived from an input modulation sample v m (k), such that v a (k)≃Kv m (k), where K is the desired constant amplitude gain of said amplifier and k denotes the k th such samples, said method comprising the steps of: (a) deriving the squared magnitude x m (k) of said input modulation sample v m (k); (b) selecting, from a table of N t entitles F i where i=0, 1, . . . , N t -1, each of said entries containing a squared magnitude value x mi , and for each of which entries F i G(x mi )|F i | 2 )≃K where G(x) is the complex gain of said amplifier, a table entry F i (x m (k)) for which x mi is: (i) the largest table entry less than or equal to x m (k); or, (ii) the smallest table entry greater than or equal to x m (k); (c) deriving said predistorted sample v d (k) as v d (k) = v m (k)F i (x m (k)) in rectangular coordinates, viz: Re(v.sub.d (k))=Re(v.sub.m (k))Re(F.sub.i (k))-Im(v.sub.m (k))Im (F.sub.i (x.sub.m (k))) Im(v.sub.d (k))=Re(v.sub.m (k))Im(F.sub.i (x.sub.m (k)))+Im(vhd m( k))Re(F.sub.i (x.sub.m (k))) where Re(x) is the real component of x and Im(x) is the imaginary component of x; (d) driving said amplifier with said predetermined input sample v d (k); (e) incrementing k by 1; and, (f) sequentially repeating steps (a) through (e).
Claim 6
Independent Claim 316 words
A method of linearizing an amplifier to produce an amplified output sample v a (k) in response to a predistorted input sample v d (k) derived from an input modulation sample v m (k), such that v a (k)≃Kv m (k), where K is the desired constant amplitude gain of said amplifier and k denotes the k th such sample, said method comprising the steps of: (a) deriving the squared magnitude x m (k) of said input modulation sample v m (k); (b) selecting, from a table of N t entries F i (k) where i= 0, 1, . . . , N t -1, each of said entries containing a squared magnitude value x mi (k), and for each of which entries F i (k)G(x mi (k)|F i (k)| 2 )≃K where G(x) is the complex gain of said amplifier, a table entry F i (k) for which x mi is: (i) the largest table entry less than or equal to x m (k); or, (ii) the smallest table entry greater than or equal to x m (k); (c) deriving said predistorted sample v d (k) as v d (k)= v m (k)F I (k) in rectangular coordinates, viz: Re(v.sub.d (k))=Re(v.sub.m (k))Re(F.sub.i (k))-Im(V.sub.m (k))Im( F.sub.i (k)) Im(v.sub.d (k))=Re(v.sub.m (k))Im(F.sub.i (k))+Im(V.sub.m (K)) Re(F.sub.i (K)) where Re(x) is the real component of x and Im(x) is the imaginary component of x; (d) driving said amplifier with said predistorted input sample v d (k); (e) deriving said amplified output sample v a (k); (f) deriving an error sample e(k)-(v a (k)-Kv m (k))v m * (k); (g) deriving an adjusted value F=hd i(k+1) of said selected table entry F i (k), where: ##EQU14## where α is an appropriately chosen constant; (h) replacing said table entry F i (k) with said adjusted value F i (k+1); (i) incrementing k by 1; and, (j) sequentially repeating steps (a) through (i).
Claim 7
Independent Claim 316 words
A method of linearizing an amplifier to produce an amplified output sample v a (k) in response to a predistorted input sample v d (k) derived from an input modulation sample v m (k), such that v a (k)≃Kv m (k), where K is the desired constant amplitude gain of said amplifier and k denotes the k th such sample, said method comprising the steps of: (a) deriving the squared magnitude x m (k) of said input modulation sample v m (k); (b) selecting, from a table of N t entries F i (k) where i= 0, 1, . . . , N t -1, each of said entries containing a squared magnitude value x mi (k), and for each of which entries F i (k)G(x mi (k)|F i (k)| 2 )≃K where G(x) is the complex gain of said amplifier, a table entry F i (k) for which x mi is: (i) the largest table entry less than or equal to x m (k); or, (ii) the smallest table entry greater than or equal to x m (k); (c) deriving said predistorted sample v d (k) as v d (k)= v m (k)F I (k) in rectangular coordinates, viz: Re(v.sub.d (k))=Re(v.sub.m (k))Re(F.sub.i (k))-Im(V.sub.m (k))Im( F.sub.i (k)) Im(v.sub.d (k))=Re(v.sub.m (k))Im(F.sub.i (k))+Im(V.sub.m (K)) Re(F.sub.i (K)) where Re(x) is the real component of x and Im(x) is the imaginary component of x; (d) driving said amplifier with said predistorted input sample v d (k); (e) deriving said amplified output sample v a (k); (f) deriving an error sample e(k)-(v a (k)-Kv m (k))v m * (k); (g) deriving an adjusted value F=hd i(k+1) of said selected table entry F i (k), where: ##EQU14## where α is an appropriately chosen constant; (h) replacing said table entry F i (k) with said adjusted value F i (k+1); (i) incrementing k by 1; and, (j) sequentially repeating steps (a) through (i).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 38 words
A method as defined in claim 1, wherein said selecting step further comprises selecting that table entry F i for which the absolute value |x m -x mi | is minimized with respect to the table index i.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 41 words
A method as defined in claim 3, wherein said selecting step further comprises selecting that table entry F i (x m (k)) for which the absolute value |x m -x mi | is minimized with respect to the table index i.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 39 words
A method as defined in claim 4, wherein said selecting step further comprises selecting that table entry F i (k) for which the absolute value |x m (k)-x mi (k)| is minimized with respect to the table index i.
Claim 11
Independent Claim 187 words
A method of linearizing an amplifier to produce an amplified output sample v a in response to a predistorted input sample v d derived from an input modulation sample v m , such that v a ≃Kv m , where K is the desired constant amplitude gain of said amplifier, said method comprising the steps of: (a) deriving the squared magnitude x m of said input modulation sample v m ; (b) deriving, by interpolation on a table containing N t values F i where i=0, 1, . . . , N t -1, each of said entries corresponding to a squared magnitude value x mi , and for each of which entries F i G(x mi |F i | 2 )≃K where G(x) is the complex gain of said amplifier, a value F(x m ); (c) deriving said predistorted sample v d as v d =v m F(x m ) in rectangular coordinates, viz: Re(v.sub.d)=Re(v.sub.m)Re(F(x.sub.m))-IM(V.sub.m)Im(F(x.sub.m)) Im(v.sub.d)=Re(v.sub.m)Im(F(x.sub.m))+Im(V.sub.m)Re(F(x.sub.m)) where Re (x) is the real component of x and Im(x) is the imaginary component of x; and, (d) driving said amplifier with said predistorted input sample v d .
Claim 12
Independent Claim 187 words
A method of linearizing an amplifier to produce an amplified output sample v a in response to a predistorted input sample v d derived from an input modulation sample v m , such that v a ≃Kv m , where K is the desired constant amplitude gain of said amplifier, said method comprising the steps of: (a) deriving the squared magnitude x m of said input modulation sample v m ; (b) deriving, by interpolation on a table containing N t values F i where i=0, 1, . . . , N t -1, each of said entries corresponding to a squared magnitude value x mi , and for each of which entries F i G(x mi |F i | 2 )≃K where G(x) is the complex gain of said amplifier, a value F(x m ); (c) deriving said predistorted sample v d as v d =v m F(x m ) in rectangular coordinates, viz: Re(v.sub.d)=Re(v.sub.m)Re(F(x.sub.m))-IM(V.sub.m)Im(F(x.sub.m)) Im(v.sub.d)=Re(v.sub.m)Im(F(x.sub.m))+Im(V.sub.m)Re(F(x.sub.m)) where Re (x) is the real component of x and Im(x) is the imaginary component of x; and, (d) driving said amplifier with said predistorted input sample v d .

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US4291277A Cited
US4412337A Cited
US4462001A Cited
US4554514A Cited
US4700151A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1994-09-16 1995-03-18 1995-09-17 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1998-09-16 1999-03-18 1999-09-17 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2002-09-16 2003-03-18 2003-09-17 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag