US5043987A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for calculating adaptive inference test figure of merit
Assignee: Array Analysis Inc
•
Filing: 1989-11-07
•
Granted: 1991-08-27
•
Expires: 2009-11-07
Abstract
Abstract A method for using an adaptive inference system to detect and locate faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly. The steps include performing a position-dependent, time-ordered test upon an electrical or electronic device or assembly to provide comprehensive error analysis. The error analysis includes a library of error information. Previously unobserved faults can be detected and located despite their possible remoteness within the device or assembly. When detected faults are compared with error library, a figure of merit is calculated for all possibilities of detected faults.
Inventors
- 👤 William D. Stark
- 👤 Gregory C. Prestas
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 02:46
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; Y; Y10; Y10S; Y10S706/00; Y10S706/902; Y10S706/911; Y10S706/916
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
222 words
An adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly, some of said faults not having been observed in prior tests, or obtained from stored data and information in said adaptive inference system, or bearing a direct relationship to a problem being reviewed, said method comprising the steps of: a) performing a position-dependent, time-ordered test upon an electrical or electronic device or assembly to provide a comprehensive error analysis; b) developing an error plane or detected faults consisting of channels on one axis of said error plane and time samples on another axis of said error plane, each channel of said error plane being represented in three ways: (i) as bits, defining binary words representing a number of errors, (ii) as groups, defining a binary word representing a number of times an error changes from a "no error condition" to an "error condition," and (iii) as a range, defining bits that represent an error over a segment of said error plane; (c) comparing said detected faults with stored faults data and information; and (d) calculating a figure of merit for each of said bits, groups and range errors, and weighting and summing each of said bits, groups and range errors to provide a total figure of merit for said detected fault.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
222 words
An adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly, some of said faults not having been observed in prior tests, or obtained from stored data and information in said adaptive inference system, or bearing a direct relationship to a problem being reviewed, said method comprising the steps of: a) performing a position-dependent, time-ordered test upon an electrical or electronic device or assembly to provide a comprehensive error analysis; b) developing an error plane or detected faults consisting of channels on one axis of said error plane and time samples on another axis of said error plane, each channel of said error plane being represented in three ways: (i) as bits, defining binary words representing a number of errors, (ii) as groups, defining a binary word representing a number of times an error changes from a "no error condition" to an "error condition," and (iii) as a range, defining bits that represent an error over a segment of said error plane; (c) comparing said detected faults with stored faults data and information; and (d) calculating a figure of merit for each of said bits, groups and range errors, and weighting and summing each of said bits, groups and range errors to provide a total figure of merit for said detected fault.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
46 words
The adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly in accordance with claim 1, wherein said bit errors and group errors are each weighted approximately 1/4, and said range errors are weighted approximately 1/2.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
97 words
The adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly in accordance with claim 1, wherein said figure of merit for each bit, group and range error is calculated according to the formula: match bits/base bits×match bits/new bits wherein base bits are defined as the number of error bits in a stored error plane, new bits are defined as the number of bits of an acquired error plane, and match bits are defined as the number of bits in common between base bits and new bits.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
97 words
The adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly in accordance with claim 2, wherein said figure of merit for each bit, group and range error is calculated according to the formula: match bits/base bits×match bits/new bits wherein base bits are defined as the number of error bits in a stored error plane, new bits are defined as the number of bits of an acquired error plane and match bits are defined as the number of bits in common between base bits and new bits.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
34 words
The adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly in accordance with claim 1, wherein fault data and information is transition encoded.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
169 words
An adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly, some of said faults not having been observed in prior tests, or obtained from stored data and information in said adaptive inference system, or bearing a direct relationship to a problem being reviewed, some method comprising the steps of: a) performing a position-dependent, time-ordered test upon an electrical or electronic device or assembly to provide a comprehensive error analysis; b) developing an error plane of detected faults consisting of channels on one axis of said error plane and time samples on another axis of said error plane, each channel of said error plane comprising serial bit streams representing a number of errors; c) comparing said detected faults with stored fault data and information; and d) calculating a figure of merit for each of said bit stream errors, and weighting and summing each of said bit stream errors to provide a total figure of merit for said detected fault.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
169 words
An adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly, some of said faults not having been observed in prior tests, or obtained from stored data and information in said adaptive inference system, or bearing a direct relationship to a problem being reviewed, some method comprising the steps of: a) performing a position-dependent, time-ordered test upon an electrical or electronic device or assembly to provide a comprehensive error analysis; b) developing an error plane of detected faults consisting of channels on one axis of said error plane and time samples on another axis of said error plane, each channel of said error plane comprising serial bit streams representing a number of errors; c) comparing said detected faults with stored fault data and information; and d) calculating a figure of merit for each of said bit stream errors, and weighting and summing each of said bit stream errors to provide a total figure of merit for said detected fault.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
94 words
The adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly in accordance with claim 6, wherein said figure of merit for each bit stream is calculated according to the formula: match bits/base bits×match bits/new bits wherein base bits are defined as the number of error bits in a stored error plane, new bits are defined as the number of bits of an acquired error plane, and match bits are defined as the number of bits in common between base bits and new bits.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
33 words
The adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly in accordance with claim 6, wherein said bit streams comprise J-Tag data.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
34 words
The adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly in accordance with claim 6, wherein said bit streams comprise boundary scan information.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
34 words
The adaptive inference method of calculating a figure of merit for detected faults in an electrical or electronic device or assembly in accordance with claim 6, wherein fault data and information is transition encoded.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4402054A
Cited
US4642782A
Cited
US4688234A
Cited
US4709366A
Cited
US4803642A
Cited
US4841456A
Cited
US4766595A
Cited
US4791578A
Cited
US4847795A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1994-08-26 | 1995-02-25 | 1995-08-27 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1998-08-26 | 1999-02-25 | 1999-08-27 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2002-08-26 | 2003-02-25 | 2003-08-27 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |