Patent US4965775A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4965775A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Image derived directional microphones
Assignee: Nokia Bell Labs
•
Filing: 1989-05-19
•
Granted: 1990-10-23
•
Expires: 2009-05-19
Abstract
Abstract Second-order gradient (SOG) toroidal and unidirectional microphones derived using a first-order gradient sensor (FOG) and a reflecting plane are described. The FOG is positioned with its axis illustratively orthogonal to and suspended a few centimeters from a large acoustically reflecting surface. The resulting sensor image is phase reversed resulting in a transducer that is a linear quadrupole. The linear quadrupole can be described by two dimensions, the distance corresponding to the FOG's dipole distance and twice the distance from the reflecting plane. If the reflecting surface is large enough or if the wall of an enclosure is used, the resulting microphone becomes a SOG unidirectional microphone. The perfect match between the sensor and its image from a good acoustic reflector results in an ideal SOG microphone with 3 dB beam width of ±33° and no grating lobes below about 3 kHz for a spacing from the reflecting plane of about 2.5 cm. A wall-mounted toroid can be formed by using two FOGs at right angles to each other and with the axis of each sensor at 45° to the reflecting surface and a spacing between transducers that is twice the height of the transducers from the reflecting plane. A table-mounted toroid can be realized by properly combining a filtered version of a suspended FOG and an omnidirectional sensor flush mounted to the reflecting table-top. Other arrays of image-derived directional sensors are applied to hands-free telephoning and other noise and reverberation-reducing arrangements.
Inventors
- 👤 Gary W. Elko
- 👤 Robert A. Kubli
- 👤 Jeffrey P. McAteer
- 👤 James E. West
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-09 15:46
CPC Classifications
H; H04; H04R; H04R1/00; H04R1/20; H04R1/32; H04R1/40; H04R1/406; H04R1/326; H04R1/34; H04R1/38; H04R2499/00; H04R2499/10; H04R2499/13
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 20
Claim 1
Independent Claim
54 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement, which comprises: a directional acoustic sensor unit having first-order gradient characteristics an acoustically reflecting surface said sensor unit being positioned relative to said reflecting surface whereby the acoustic interaction between said sensor unit and said surface causes the output of said sensor unit to have a second-order gradient response pattern.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
54 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement, which comprises: a directional acoustic sensor unit having first-order gradient characteristics an acoustically reflecting surface said sensor unit being positioned relative to said reflecting surface whereby the acoustic interaction between said sensor unit and said surface causes the output of said sensor unit to have a second-order gradient response pattern.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
21 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 1 in which selected portions of the acoustically reflecting surface incorporate acoustic absorbing material.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
37 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 1 in which the acoustically reflecting surface has a lateral extent for which the linear dimensions are much greater than the spacing of said reflecting surface from said sensor unit.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
27 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 1 in which the acoustically reflecting surface is acoustically essentially planar for acoustic waves having a selected range of wavelengths.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
32 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 4 in which the acoustically reflecting arrangement is a major surface of or within an enclosure sized to enclose a source of said acoustic waves.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
71 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 1 in which the sensor unit has a directivity pattern having a major axis and a minor axis the acoustically reflecting surface is oriented with respect to said axes to accentuate directivity of said directivity pattern to increase sensitivity of said unit to acoustic waves propagating parallel to said major axis as compared to sensitivity to acoustic waves propagating parallel to said minor axis.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
30 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 6 in which the acoustically reflecting surface is oriented essentially orthogonal to the major axis of the directivity pattern of the sensor unit.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
34 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 7 in which the acoustically reflecting surface has two orthogonal linear dimensions much greater than the longest wavelength of a selected wavelength range of said acoustic waves.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
35 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 8 in which said acoustically-reflecting surface is acoustically essentially planar throughout the range of said two orthogonal linear dimensions for all acoustic waves in said selected wavelength range.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
22 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 9 in which the acoustically-reflecting surface, is a major surface of or within a room.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
80 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 7 in which the sensor unit has a directivity pattern in the absence of the acoustically reflecting surface, which pattern varies at least in part according to cos θ, where θ is the angle between the direction of propagation of an acoustic wave to be sensed and said major axis of said pattern, whereby the acoustically reflecting surface modifies the directivity pattern to vary in said same part according to cos 2 θ.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
83 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 1 in which the acoustic sensor unit includes a sensitive portion and an associated acoustical baffle, said sensitive portion being centrally disposed within said baffle to create said directivity pattern having a major axis, said acoustically-reflecting surface having a planar surface having a separation from said sensor unit less than one-quarter of a selected wavelength of an acoustic wave to be sensed and having planar dimensions at least an order of magnitude greater than said separation.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
24 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 1 or claim 12 including at least two of said acoustic sensor units to form an array.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
56 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 including a plurality of said acoustic sensor units, each having the major axis of its directivity pattern essentially orthogonal to said major surface of the acoustically-reflecting surface, whereby the sensor arrangement has an essentially undirectional directivity pattern.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
55 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, or 12 including a plurality of said acoustic sensor units, each having the major axis of its directivity pattern inclined toward a common region of said acoustically-reflecting surface whereby the sensor arrangement has an essentially toroidal directivity pattern.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
102 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claims 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 or 12 including a plurality of said acoustic sensor units, each having the major axis of its directivity pattern inclined toward a region of said acoustically-reflecting surface said region being substantially central with respect said plurality of units, and further including an omnidirectional acoustic sensor disposed at said substantially central region to modify the directivity pattern of the arrangement to increase sensitivity to acousticwaves propagating over said major surface of said image effecting means at angles greater than 45° from the normal to said surface.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
31 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 1 or claim 12 including a sufficient number of the acoustic sensor units in an array to define a reception beam of selected shape.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
59 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 1 or claim 12 including an acoustically reflecting wall as at least a part of the acoustically reflecting surface and a substantial number of the acoustic sensor units in an array with respect to said wall to define a reception beam having a selected variation of reception sensitivity in the vertical dimension.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
49 words
An acoustic sensor arrangement according to claim 1 or claim 12 including an acoustically reflecting table surface as at least a part of the acoustically reflecting surface effecting means and a plurality of unidirectional acoustic units in a reception-pattern forming array with respect to said acoustically reflecting table surface.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US1735905A
Cited
US4675906A
Cited
US4742548A
Cited
US4589137A
Cited
US4658425A
Cited
US4802227A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-10-22 | 1994-04-23 | 1994-10-23 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-10-22 | 1998-04-23 | 1998-10-23 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-10-22 | 2002-04-23 | 2002-10-23 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |