Patent US4937584A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4937584A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Adaptive phase-shifter nulling techniques for large-aperture phases arrays
Assignee: United States Department of the Navy
•
Filing: 1988-12-22
•
Granted: 1990-06-26
•
Expires: 2008-12-22
Abstract
Abstract A method of nulling out interference sources in a large-aperture phased ay radar system is described. The system has apriori knowledge of the interference sources and depends upon access to the array element phase shifters for injection of phase only or phase and amplitude perturbations, of a mainbeam aperture distribution, into said array element phase shifters. The phase or phase and amplitude perturbations are derived from an aperture ripple modulation algorithm. The system does not require any auxiliary elements or correlators or beamformers. A method of nulling out interference sources in a monopulse large-aperture phased array radar system is also described wherein the phase only or phase and amplitude perturbations are injected into both the sum and difference beams.
Inventors
- 👤 William F. Gabriel
- 👤 Theodore C. Cheston
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-28 20:12
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01S; G01S7/00; G01S7/02; G01S7/28; G01S7/2813; H; H01; H01Q; H01Q25/00; H01Q25/02; H01Q3/00; H01Q3/26; H01Q3/2605; H01Q3/2611; G01S13/00; G01S13/02; G01S13/06; G01S13/42; G01S13/44
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 18
Claim 1
Independent Claim
347 words
A method of nulling out interference sources in a large-aperture phased-array radar system having a plurality of phase shifters, apriori knowledge of the direction of interference sources, one mainbeam output port and access to the array element phase shifters, said method comprising the steps of: determining the directions of the interfering sources to be nulled out; determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU6## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU7## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of elements, θ o =quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU8## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU9## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial according to the following steps: (1) establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k)[1+jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k)[1-jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))]; (4) monitoring P(t) during sequence 3 above giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) Updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); injecting phase perturbations into a mainbeam aperture distribution via accessible phase shifters.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
347 words
A method of nulling out interference sources in a large-aperture phased-array radar system having a plurality of phase shifters, apriori knowledge of the direction of interference sources, one mainbeam output port and access to the array element phase shifters, said method comprising the steps of: determining the directions of the interfering sources to be nulled out; determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU6## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU7## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of elements, θ o =quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU8## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU9## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial according to the following steps: (1) establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k)[1+jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k)[1-jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))]; (4) monitoring P(t) during sequence 3 above giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) Updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); injecting phase perturbations into a mainbeam aperture distribution via accessible phase shifters.
Claim 3
Independent Claim
353 words
A method of nulling out interference sources in a large-aperture phased-array radar system having a plurality of phase shifters, apriori knowledge of the direction of interference sources, one mainbeam output port and access to the array element phase shifters, said method comprising the steps of: determining the directions of the interfering sources to be nulled out; determining an adaptive weight w(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU10## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU11## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of elements, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU12## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU13## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial according to the following steps: (1) establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+Δ i exp(ψ i (k)) ] and W i - (k)=W(k)[1-Δ i exp(ψ i (k))]; (4) monitoring P(t) during sequence 3 above giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) Updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); injecting phase and amplitude perturbations into a mainbeam aperture distribution via accessible phase and amplitude devices.
Claim 4
Independent Claim
353 words
A method of nulling out interference sources in a large-aperture phased-array radar system having a plurality of phase shifters, apriori knowledge of the direction of interference sources, one mainbeam output port and access to the array element phase shifters, said method comprising the steps of: determining the directions of the interfering sources to be nulled out; determining an adaptive weight w(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU10## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU11## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of elements, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU12## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU13## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial according to the following steps: (1) establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+Δ i exp(ψ i (k)) ] and W i - (k)=W(k)[1-Δ i exp(ψ i (k))]; (4) monitoring P(t) during sequence 3 above giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) Updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); injecting phase and amplitude perturbations into a mainbeam aperture distribution via accessible phase and amplitude devices.
Claim 5
Independent Claim
346 words
A method of nulling out interference sources in a monopulse large-aperture phased array radar system having both a sum and a difference port, and apriori knowledge of said interference sources and access to the array element phase shifters, said method comprising the steps of: determining the directions of the interfering sources to be nulled out; determining an adaptive weight w(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU14## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU15## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of elements, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU16## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU17## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial according to the following steps: (1) establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k) [1-jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))]; (4) monitoring P(t) during sequence 3 above giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) Updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); injecting phase perturbations separately into the sum and difference beams.
Claim 6
Independent Claim
346 words
A method of nulling out interference sources in a monopulse large-aperture phased array radar system having both a sum and a difference port, and apriori knowledge of said interference sources and access to the array element phase shifters, said method comprising the steps of: determining the directions of the interfering sources to be nulled out; determining an adaptive weight w(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU14## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU15## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of elements, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU16## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU17## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial according to the following steps: (1) establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k) [1-jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))]; (4) monitoring P(t) during sequence 3 above giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) Updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); injecting phase perturbations separately into the sum and difference beams.
Claim 7
Independent Claim
349 words
A method of nulling out interference sources in a monopulse large-aperture phased array radar system having both a sum and a difference port, and apriori knowledge of said interference sources and access to the array element phase shifters, said method comprising the steps of: determining the directions of the interfering sources to be nulled out; determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU18## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU19## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of elements, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU20## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU21## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial according to the following steps: (1) establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+Δ i exp(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k) [1-Δ i exp(ψ i (k))]; (4) monitoring P(t) during sequence 3 above giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) Updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); injecting both phase and amplitude perturbations into both the sum and difference beams.
Claim 8
Independent Claim
349 words
A method of nulling out interference sources in a monopulse large-aperture phased array radar system having both a sum and a difference port, and apriori knowledge of said interference sources and access to the array element phase shifters, said method comprising the steps of: determining the directions of the interfering sources to be nulled out; determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU18## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU19## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of elements, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU20## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU21## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial according to the following steps: (1) establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+Δ i exp(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k) [1-Δ i exp(ψ i (k))]; (4) monitoring P(t) during sequence 3 above giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) Updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); injecting both phase and amplitude perturbations into both the sum and difference beams.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
85 words
A method of nulling out interference sources in a large-aperture phased-array radar system which includes a space-fed lens in which a mainbeam is scanned by phase-shifters located in an objective lens, said method comprising the steps of: determining the directions of the interfering sources to be nulled out; using an off-axis de-focused feed as an auxiliary beam, and applying aperture ripple modulation to focus the de-focused feed onto an emitter; and adaptively weighting an output of said de-focused feed to cancel interference from the mainbeam.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
85 words
A method of nulling out interference sources in a large-aperture phased-array radar system which includes a space-fed lens in which a mainbeam is scanned by phase-shifters located in an objective lens, said method comprising the steps of: determining the directions of the interfering sources to be nulled out; using an off-axis de-focused feed as an auxiliary beam, and applying aperture ripple modulation to focus the de-focused feed onto an emitter; and adaptively weighting an output of said de-focused feed to cancel interference from the mainbeam.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
377 words
A large-aperture, phased-array radar system for nulling out interference sources, said system having apriori knowledge of said interference sources, and one mainbeam output port and access to array element phase shifters, comprises: means for determining the directions of the sources to be nulled out; means for determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: E1 ? ##STR1## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU22## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of elements, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; means for determining the coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU23## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU24## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; means for determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial, said means for determining the update increments includes (1) means for establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) means for establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) means for applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k) [1-jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))]; (4) means for monitoring P(t) giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) means for determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) means for updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); a plurality of phase shifters; a plurality of phased array elements connected to said plurality of phase shifters; means for injecting phase perturbations of a mainbeam aperture distribution into said mainbeam aperture.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
377 words
A large-aperture, phased-array radar system for nulling out interference sources, said system having apriori knowledge of said interference sources, and one mainbeam output port and access to array element phase shifters, comprises: means for determining the directions of the sources to be nulled out; means for determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: E1 ? ##STR1## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU22## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of elements, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; means for determining the coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU23## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU24## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; means for determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial, said means for determining the update increments includes (1) means for establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) means for establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) means for applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k) [1-jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))]; (4) means for monitoring P(t) giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) means for determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) means for updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); a plurality of phase shifters; a plurality of phased array elements connected to said plurality of phase shifters; means for injecting phase perturbations of a mainbeam aperture distribution into said mainbeam aperture.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
376 words
A large-aperture, phased-array radar system for nulling out interference sources, said system having apriori knowledge of said interference sources, and one mainbeam output port and access to array element phase shifters, comprises: means for determining the directions of the sources to be nulled out; means for determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU25## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU26## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of element, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; means for determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU27## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU28## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; means for determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial, said means for determining the update increments includes (1) means for establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) means for establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) means for applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+Δ i exp(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k) [1-Δ i exp(ψ 1 (k))]; (4) means for monitoring P(t) giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) means for determining and the Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) means for updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); a plurality of phase shifters; a plurality of phased array elements connected to said plurality of phase shifters; means for injecting phase and amplitude perturbations of a mainbeam aperture distribution into said mainbeam aperture.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
376 words
A large-aperture, phased-array radar system for nulling out interference sources, said system having apriori knowledge of said interference sources, and one mainbeam output port and access to array element phase shifters, comprises: means for determining the directions of the sources to be nulled out; means for determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU25## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU26## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of element, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; means for determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU27## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU28## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; means for determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial, said means for determining the update increments includes (1) means for establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) means for establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) means for applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+Δ i exp(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k) [1-Δ i exp(ψ 1 (k))]; (4) means for monitoring P(t) giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) means for determining and the Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) means for updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); a plurality of phase shifters; a plurality of phased array elements connected to said plurality of phase shifters; means for injecting phase and amplitude perturbations of a mainbeam aperture distribution into said mainbeam aperture.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
381 words
A monopulse, large-aperture, phased-array radar system for nulling out interference sources, said system having apriori knowledge of said interfering sources, and both a sum and a difference port, and access to array element phase shifters, comprises: means for determining the directions of the sources to be nulled out; means for determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU29## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU30## where d=element spacing. λ=wavelength, K=total number of element, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; means for determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU31## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU32## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; means for determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial, said means for determining the update increments includes (1) means for establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) means for establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) means for applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k) [1-jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))]; (4) means for monitoring P(t) giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) means for determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) means for updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); a plurality of phase shifters; a plurality of phased array elements connected to said plurality of phase shifters; and means for injecting phase perturbations of a mainbeam aperture distribution, into the sum and difference beams.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
381 words
A monopulse, large-aperture, phased-array radar system for nulling out interference sources, said system having apriori knowledge of said interfering sources, and both a sum and a difference port, and access to array element phase shifters, comprises: means for determining the directions of the sources to be nulled out; means for determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU29## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation, ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU30## where d=element spacing. λ=wavelength, K=total number of element, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; means for determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU31## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU32## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; means for determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial, said means for determining the update increments includes (1) means for establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) means for establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) means for applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=W(k) [1-jΔ i sin(ψ i (k))]; (4) means for monitoring P(t) giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) means for determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) means for updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); a plurality of phase shifters; a plurality of phased array elements connected to said plurality of phase shifters; and means for injecting phase perturbations of a mainbeam aperture distribution, into the sum and difference beams.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
383 words
A monopulse, large-aperture, phased-array radar system for nulling out interference sources, said system having apriori knowledge of said interfering sources, and both a sum and a difference port, and access to array element phase shifters, comprises: means for determining the directions of the sources to be nulled out; means for determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU33## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation. ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU34## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of element, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; means for determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU35## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU36## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; means for determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial, said means for determining the update increments includes (1) means for establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) means for establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) means for applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+Δ i exp(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=w(k) [1-Δ i exp(ψ i (k))]; (4) means for monitoring P(t) giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) means for determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) means for updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); a plurality of phase shifters; a plurality of phased array elements connected to said plurality of phase shifters; means for injecting both phase and amplitude perturbations of a mainbeam aperture distribution into the sum and difference beams.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
383 words
A monopulse, large-aperture, phased-array radar system for nulling out interference sources, said system having apriori knowledge of said interfering sources, and both a sum and a difference port, and access to array element phase shifters, comprises: means for determining the directions of the sources to be nulled out; means for determining an adaptive weight W(k) for each antenna element of said phased array, said adaptive weight being represented by: ##EQU33## wherein W q (k)=quiescent beam kth element weight, A i =amplitude of ith source perturbation. ψ i (k)=phase of ith source perturbation at the kth element, ##EQU34## where d=element spacing, λ=wavelength, K=total number of element, θ.sub. = quiescent mainbeam steering direction, and θ i =direction angle of ith source; means for determining coefficient A i via a recursive modulation trial and update routing expressed in the form: ##EQU35## where A i (n)=value of A i used in current trial, A i (n+1)=value of A i for next trial, μ i (n)=update increment from current trial, τ(n)=integrating time constant, wherein ##EQU36## and S(n)=current trial value of best SNR; means for determining the update increments from a weight perturbation modulation trial with the array output power P(t), being monitored and averaged for equal time periods during the modulation trial, said means for determining the update increments includes (1) means for establishing an initial value of averaged P(t) for unperturbed weight W(k), (2) means for establishing an initial value for the weight perturbation magnitude Δ i , (3) means for applying the Δ i as a weight perturbation modulation in plus-minus sequence for the i(th) source above wherein W i + (k)=W(k) [1+Δ i exp(ψ i (k))] and W i - (k)=w(k) [1-Δ i exp(ψ i (k))]; (4) means for monitoring P(t) giving two corresponding averaged output power levels P i (+)=averaged P(t) for W i + weights and P i (-)=averaged P(t) for W i - weights; (5) means for determining the best Δ i from sequence 3 above; (6) means for updating A i (n) and W(k) with the updated values of μ i (n) and τ(n); a plurality of phase shifters; a plurality of phased array elements connected to said plurality of phase shifters; means for injecting both phase and amplitude perturbations of a mainbeam aperture distribution into the sum and difference beams.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-06-25 | 1993-12-25 | 1994-06-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-06-25 | 1997-12-25 | 1998-06-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-06-25 | 2001-12-25 | 2002-06-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |