Patent US4924183A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
← Back to Patent Explorer
US4924183A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Method of determining the spectral distribution of the nuclear magnetization in a limited volume, and device for performing the method

Assignee: US Philips Corp
•
Filing: 1989-02-10
•
Granted: 1990-05-08
•
Expires: 2009-02-10
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract A method of a device for determining the spectral distribution of a nuclear magnetization in a limited volume, wherein each sequence of r.f. and gradient excitation comprises a sub-sequence which dephases the nuclear magnetization everywhere outside a defined layer. This sub-sequence is followed by three r.f. pulses, the first two of which are layer-selective. These three r.f. pulses excite the nuclear magnetization in an area of intersection between said layer and two layers which extend perpendicularly to one another and to said layer. In order to suppress undesirable FID signals and to enhance the spectrum, phase cycling is performed.

Inventors

  • 👤 Dietmar Kunz
  • 👤 Karl Georg H. Bomsdorf
  • 👤 Jurgen S. Wieland

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-11-08 01:40
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R33/00; G01R33/20; G01R33/44; G01R33/48; G01R33/4818; G01R33/482; G01R33/54; G01R33/56; G01R33/483; G01R33/4838

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 22
Claim 1
Independent Claim 216 words
A method of determining the nuclear magnetisation distribution in a limited volume by means of a plurality of sequences, three r.f. pulses being applied to an examination zone in each sequence in the presence of a steady, uniform magnetic field, the first and the second r.f. pulse cooperating with a respective one of two magnetic fields whose gradients extend perpendicularly with respect to one another, stimulated echo signals generated in each sequence being added and subjected to a Fourier transformation, characterized in that each sequence comprises a sub-sequence (HF1' . . . HF3') which precedes the three r.f. pulses (HF1 . . . HF3) and which dephases the nuclear magnetisation everywhere outside a layer (S) in said examination zone which extends parallel to the plane defined by the two gradient directions (Gy, Gz), the sequences taking place in cycles, the sequences being repeated n times in each cycle, where n is larger than or equal to 3, all sequences of a cycle being distinct from one another as regards the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse by 360°/n or an integer multiple thereof which is not zero, the spin resonance signals generated by the sequences being added so that FID signals produced by the third r.f. pulse (HF3) compensate for one another.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 216 words
A method of determining the nuclear magnetisation distribution in a limited volume by means of a plurality of sequences, three r.f. pulses being applied to an examination zone in each sequence in the presence of a steady, uniform magnetic field, the first and the second r.f. pulse cooperating with a respective one of two magnetic fields whose gradients extend perpendicularly with respect to one another, stimulated echo signals generated in each sequence being added and subjected to a Fourier transformation, characterized in that each sequence comprises a sub-sequence (HF1' . . . HF3') which precedes the three r.f. pulses (HF1 . . . HF3) and which dephases the nuclear magnetisation everywhere outside a layer (S) in said examination zone which extends parallel to the plane defined by the two gradient directions (Gy, Gz), the sequences taking place in cycles, the sequences being repeated n times in each cycle, where n is larger than or equal to 3, all sequences of a cycle being distinct from one another as regards the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse by 360°/n or an integer multiple thereof which is not zero, the spin resonance signals generated by the sequences being added so that FID signals produced by the third r.f. pulse (HF3) compensate for one another.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the three r.f. pulses (HF1 . . . HF3) are 90° pulses.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 134 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the sub-sequence comprises a first 90° r.f. pulse (HF1'), a 180° r.f. pulse (HF2') and a second 90° r.f. pulse (HF3'), the two 90° r.f. pulses (HF1' and HF3') being situated at the same distance from the 180° r.f. pulse (HF2'), between the first 90° r.f. pulse and the 180° r.f. pulse and after the 180° r.f. pulse there being activated a magnetic field with a gradient (Gx) which extends perpendicularly with respect to the layer to be influenced, the integral over this gradient between the first 90° r.f. pulse (HF1') and the 180° r.f. pulse (HF2') being equal to the integral over this magnetic field from the end of the 180° pulse until the centre (t2) of the second 90° r.f. pulse (HF3').
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 25 words
A method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the magnetic field remains activated beyond the end of the second 90° r.f. pulse (HF3').
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 47 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the distance between the first (HF1) and the second r.f. pulse (HF2) corresponds to either the reciprocal value of the scalar coupling constant J, or a multiple thereof, or is small in comparison with the reciprocal value.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 49 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the phase of the third r.f. pulse (HF3) of the sequences with reference to a reference phase (x) is equal to the negative value of the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse (HF1 and HF2).
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 29 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that the third one (HF3) of the three r.f. pulse (HF1 . . . HF3) is a frequency-selective r.f. pulse.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the three r.f. pulses (HF1 . . . HF3) are 90° pulses.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method as claimed in claim 5, characterized in that the three r.f. pulses (HF1 . . . HF3) are 90° pulses.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that the three r.f. pulses (HF1 . . . HF3) are 90° pulses.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that the three r.f. pulses (HF1 . . . HF3) are 90° pulses.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 47 words
A method as claimed in claim 4, characterized in that the distance between the first (HF1) and the second r.f. pulse (HF2) corresponds to either the reciprocal value of the scalar coupling constant J, or a multiple thereof, or is small in comparison with the reciprocal value.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 47 words
A method as claimed in claim 11, characterized in that the distance between the first (HF1) and the second r.f. pulse (HF2) corresponds to either the reciprocal value of the scalar coupling constant J, or a multiple thereof, or is small in comparison with the reciprocal value.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim 49 words
A method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that the phase of the third r.f. pulse (HF3) of the sequences with reference to a reference phase (x) is equal to the negative value of the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse (HF1 and HF2).
Claim 16
Dependent Claim 49 words
A method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the phase of the third r.f. pulse (HF3) of the sequences with reference to a reference phase (x) is equal to the negative value of the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse (HF1 and HF2).
Claim 17
Dependent Claim 49 words
A method as claimed in claim 13, characterized in that the phase of the third r.f. pulse (HF3) of the sequences with reference to a reference phase (x) is equal to the negative value of the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse (HF1 and HF2).
Claim 18
Dependent Claim 49 words
A method as claimed in claim 11, characterized in that the phase of the third r.f. pulse (HF3) of the sequences with reference to a reference phase (x) is equal to the negative value of the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse (HF1 and HF2).
Claim 19
Dependent Claim 49 words
A method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the phase of the third r.f. pulse (HF3) of the sequences with reference to a reference phase (x) is equal to the negative value of the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse (HF1 and HF2).
Claim 20
Dependent Claim 49 words
A method as claimed in claim 17, characterized in that the phase of the third r.f. pulse (HF3) of the sequences with reference to a reference phase (x) is equal to the negative value of the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse (HF1 and HF2).
Claim 21
Independent Claim 253 words
A device for determining the nuclear magnetization distribution in a limited volume by means of a plurality of sequences applied to an examination zone comprising a magnet for generating a uniform, steady magnetic field in said examination zone, an r.f. coil system for generating an r.f. coil system with r.f. pulses, a gradient coil system for generating magnetic fields which extend in the direction of the steady magnetic field and which comprise gradients in different directions, generators for powering the gradient coils, a control unit for controlling the r.f. generator and the generators, and an arithmetic device for processing the stimulated r.f. signal, characterized in that the control unit is programmed so that it generates a plurality of sequences, each of which includes a sub-sequence (HF1' . . . HF3') whereby the nuclear magnetisation is dephased everywhere outside a layer (S), after which three r.f. pulses (HF1 . . . HF3) are generated, the first and the second r.f. pulse acting on the examination zone in the presence of a magnetic field having gradients (Gy, Gz) which extend perpendicularly to one another and to the layer, there being generated cycles comprising n sequences, where n is larger than or equal to 3, in which the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse after the subsequence deviates by 360°/n, the arithmetic device being programmed so that the spin resonance signals generated by the individual sequences are added so that FID signals generated by the third r.f. pulse compensate for one another.
Claim 22
Independent Claim 253 words
A device for determining the nuclear magnetization distribution in a limited volume by means of a plurality of sequences applied to an examination zone comprising a magnet for generating a uniform, steady magnetic field in said examination zone, an r.f. coil system for generating an r.f. coil system with r.f. pulses, a gradient coil system for generating magnetic fields which extend in the direction of the steady magnetic field and which comprise gradients in different directions, generators for powering the gradient coils, a control unit for controlling the r.f. generator and the generators, and an arithmetic device for processing the stimulated r.f. signal, characterized in that the control unit is programmed so that it generates a plurality of sequences, each of which includes a sub-sequence (HF1' . . . HF3') whereby the nuclear magnetisation is dephased everywhere outside a layer (S), after which three r.f. pulses (HF1 . . . HF3) are generated, the first and the second r.f. pulse acting on the examination zone in the presence of a magnetic field having gradients (Gy, Gz) which extend perpendicularly to one another and to the layer, there being generated cycles comprising n sequences, where n is larger than or equal to 3, in which the phase difference between the first and the second r.f. pulse after the subsequence deviates by 360°/n, the arithmetic device being programmed so that the spin resonance signals generated by the individual sequences are added so that FID signals generated by the third r.f. pulse compensate for one another.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

EP0089034A2 Cited
US4748409A Cited
US4843549A Cited
US4843321A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1993-05-07 1993-11-06 1994-05-08 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1997-05-07 1997-11-06 1998-05-08 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 2001-05-07 2001-11-06 2002-05-08 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag