Patent US4916615A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4916615A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for stratigraphic correlation and reflection character analysis of setsmic signals
Assignee: ConocoPhillips Co
•
Filing: 1986-07-14
•
Granted: 1990-04-10
•
Expires: 2006-07-14
Abstract
Abstract A method for classifying seismic data which uses a pattern recognition approach to comparing and equating data characteristics. Data is processed for a selected training area of such as a seismic section wherein a stochastic model of the data establishes data characteristics of either non-causal or causal type for selective comparison to similar data characteristics for other test areas of the data thereby to establish or classify similarities and/or distinctions between given training and test areas.
Inventors
- 👤 Chittibabu Chittineni
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-08 16:30
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01V; G01V1/00; G01V1/28; G01V1/282; G01V2210/00; G01V2210/60; G01V2210/66; G01V2210/665
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 10
Claim 1
Independent Claim
107 words
A method for classifying seismic signal data for comparison and evaluation of discontinuous seismic section data, comprising the steps of: inputting a selected section of seismic signal data; examining seismic signal data for a selected two-dimensional test area and at least one two-dimensional training area to establish a stochastic model of reflection character data for said test area and the at least one training area; and using the test area reflection character data in comparison with reflection character data derived for the at least one training area to provide relative classification as between the data characteristics for said test area and the at least one training area.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
107 words
A method for classifying seismic signal data for comparison and evaluation of discontinuous seismic section data, comprising the steps of: inputting a selected section of seismic signal data; examining seismic signal data for a selected two-dimensional test area and at least one two-dimensional training area to establish a stochastic model of reflection character data for said test area and the at least one training area; and using the test area reflection character data in comparison with reflection character data derived for the at least one training area to provide relative classification as between the data characteristics for said test area and the at least one training area.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
41 words
A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said step of using, comprises: establishing a noncausal model based on maximum likelihood decision between estimated parameters of periodic neighborhoods of each of the test area and at least one training area.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
54 words
A method as set forth in claim 2 wherein: said noncausal model is derived by treating selected sample points in the respective area as periodic with each seismic signal sample point expressed as a weighted combination of signal samples in the local neighborhood wherein each sample point is the center of its local neighborhood.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
60 words
A method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said step of using, comprises: establishing a causal model using the data in trace format as estimated for periodic sample points of a two dimensional region consisting of plural traces each a selected number of sample points in length for each of said test area and at least one training area.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
36 words
A method as set forth in claim 4 wherein: said causal model is a function of seismic reflection data values of the respective area for periodic time windows in two dimensional displacement over said training area.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method as set forth in claim 1 which further includes: comparing the reflection character data of the test area and at least one selected training area to effect stratigraphic correlation as between selected regions of a seismic section.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
43 words
A method as set forth in claim 1 which further includes: comparing the reflection character data of the test area and at least one selected training area to detect continuity of a same reflection character across a seismic section expanse exhibiting data loss.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
18 words
A method as set forth in claim 7 wherein: said seismic section expanse is an intervening dome structure.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
42 words
A method as set forth in claim 1 which further includes: comparing the reflection character data of at least one test area and at least one selected training area to effect segmentation of a seismic section into areas of differing reflection characteristics.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-04-09 | 1993-10-09 | 1994-04-10 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-04-09 | 1997-10-09 | 1998-04-10 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-04-09 | 2001-10-09 | 2002-04-10 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |