Patent US4913160A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4913160A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Electroencephalographic system and method using factor structure of the evoked potentials
Assignee: New York University
•
Filing: 1988-03-21
•
Granted: 1990-04-03
•
Expires: 2008-03-21
Abstract
Abstract In an electroencephalographic method and system for the quantitative analysis of brain waves, a programmed sequence of stimuli is automatically presented to a subject to evoke averaged evoked responses (AER's). The AER's are automatically analyzed by factor analysis in which each waveshape is reconstituted, as closely as possible, by a set of "basis waveshapes" (factors) held in memory. The "factor scores" (contributions of each factor) are Z transformed as a comparison against results from a normal population, and displayed as color-coded topographic maps of the head.
Inventors
- 👤 Erwin R. John
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 21:53
CPC Classifications
A; A61; A61B; A61B5/00; A61B5/24; A61B5/316; A61B5/369; A61B5/377
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 16
Claim 1
Independent Claim
254 words
The method of analyzing the brain waves of a human subject to determine the presence, degree and type of evoked potential abnormality, the method consisting of the steps, in sequence, of: removably securing a plurality of electrodes i to the scalp of the patient, automatically presenting a sequence of stimuli to the patient to evoke brainwave potentials (EP) at the electrodes; detecting the said EP brainwaves, amplifying the detected brainwaves, converting the amplified brainwaves into digital form, averaging the digitized brainwaves to produce average evoked responses (AER) for analysis in a digital processing computer system having computer memory; decomposing the average evoked responses (AER) by factor analysis, in which each AER from each electrode is compared to pre-formulated factor waveforms stored in the computer memory to determine the amount of voltage that each pre-formulated factor waveform contributes to said AER to thereby produce a factor score a ij , quantifying the contribution of each factor j to the AER from any electrode i; subjecting the results of the said factor score to Z-transform, wherein each of said factor scores is compared to norms stored in the computer memory to produce a factor Z-score, corresponding to a determination of waveshape normalcy and the degree of abnormality of each of said AER's and displaying the said normalcy and degree of abnormality on a color-coded topographic map comprising a head diagram in which each area of the head represents an electrode location and the colors represent normalcy and the degree of abnormality reflected by the factor Z-score.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
254 words
The method of analyzing the brain waves of a human subject to determine the presence, degree and type of evoked potential abnormality, the method consisting of the steps, in sequence, of: removably securing a plurality of electrodes i to the scalp of the patient, automatically presenting a sequence of stimuli to the patient to evoke brainwave potentials (EP) at the electrodes; detecting the said EP brainwaves, amplifying the detected brainwaves, converting the amplified brainwaves into digital form, averaging the digitized brainwaves to produce average evoked responses (AER) for analysis in a digital processing computer system having computer memory; decomposing the average evoked responses (AER) by factor analysis, in which each AER from each electrode is compared to pre-formulated factor waveforms stored in the computer memory to determine the amount of voltage that each pre-formulated factor waveform contributes to said AER to thereby produce a factor score a ij , quantifying the contribution of each factor j to the AER from any electrode i; subjecting the results of the said factor score to Z-transform, wherein each of said factor scores is compared to norms stored in the computer memory to produce a factor Z-score, corresponding to a determination of waveshape normalcy and the degree of abnormality of each of said AER's and displaying the said normalcy and degree of abnormality on a color-coded topographic map comprising a head diagram in which each area of the head represents an electrode location and the colors represent normalcy and the degree of abnormality reflected by the factor Z-score.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the stimuli presented are a series of flashes or other visual stimuli to produce visual evoked potentials (VEP's).
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
24 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the stimuli presented are a series of clicks or other auditory stimuli to produce auditory evoked potentials (AEP's).
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the stimuli presented are a series of electrical shocks or other somatosensory stimuli to produce somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP's).
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the topographic map is an interpolated map.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
15 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the topographic map is of each factor Z score.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
21 words
The method of claim 1 in which the topographic map is a composite map of a plurality of factor Z scores.
Claim 9
Independent Claim
266 words
A system for analyzing the brainwaves of a human subject to determine the presence, degree and type of evoked potential abnormality, the system consisting of: a plurality of electrodes, means for removably securing the plurality of electrodes to the scalp of the patient, stimuli means for automatically presenting a sequence of stimuli to the patient to evoke brainwave potentials (EP) at the electrodes; amplifier means for amplifying the evoked brainwaves, A/D converter means for converting the amplified brainwaves into digital brainwave form, averaging means for averaging the digitized brainwaves to provide average evoked responses (AER) for analysis in a digital processing computer system; computer means having a computer memory and calculation means for analyzing the average evoked responses by factor analysis, said computer means comparing each AER from each electrode to pre-formulated factor waveforms stored in the computer memory to determine the voltage that each pre-formulated factor waveform contributes to each AER said comparison producing a factor score a ij quantifying the contribution of each factor to the AER from any electrode; Z-transform computer means for subjecting the said factor score to Z-transform, statistical computing means for automatically comparing each of said factor scores to norms stored in the computer memory to produce a factor Z score providing a determination of normalcy versus the degree of abnormality; and display means to display the said normalcy and degree of abnormality on a color coded topographic map comprising a head diagram in which each area of the head represents an electrode location and the color represents normalcy and the degree of abnormality reflected by the factor Z score.
Claim 10
Independent Claim
266 words
A system for analyzing the brainwaves of a human subject to determine the presence, degree and type of evoked potential abnormality, the system consisting of: a plurality of electrodes, means for removably securing the plurality of electrodes to the scalp of the patient, stimuli means for automatically presenting a sequence of stimuli to the patient to evoke brainwave potentials (EP) at the electrodes; amplifier means for amplifying the evoked brainwaves, A/D converter means for converting the amplified brainwaves into digital brainwave form, averaging means for averaging the digitized brainwaves to provide average evoked responses (AER) for analysis in a digital processing computer system; computer means having a computer memory and calculation means for analyzing the average evoked responses by factor analysis, said computer means comparing each AER from each electrode to pre-formulated factor waveforms stored in the computer memory to determine the voltage that each pre-formulated factor waveform contributes to each AER said comparison producing a factor score a ij quantifying the contribution of each factor to the AER from any electrode; Z-transform computer means for subjecting the said factor score to Z-transform, statistical computing means for automatically comparing each of said factor scores to norms stored in the computer memory to produce a factor Z score providing a determination of normalcy versus the degree of abnormality; and display means to display the said normalcy and degree of abnormality on a color coded topographic map comprising a head diagram in which each area of the head represents an electrode location and the color represents normalcy and the degree of abnormality reflected by the factor Z score.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
24 words
The system of claim 8 wherein the stimuli presented are a series of flashes or other visual stimuli to produce visual evoked potentials (VEP's).
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
24 words
The system of claim 8 wherein the stimuli presented are a series of clicks or other auditory stimuli to produce auditory evoked potentials (AEP's).
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
25 words
The system of claim 8 wherein the stimuli presented are a series of electrical shocks or other somatosensory stimuli to produce somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP's).
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
13 words
The system of claim 8 wherein the topographic map is an interpolated map.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
15 words
The system of claim 8 wherein the topographic map is of each factor Z score.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
21 words
The system of claim 8 in which the topographic map is a composite map of a plurality of factor Z scores.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3780724A
Cited
US3901215A
Cited
US3799146A
Cited
US4188956A
Cited
US4201224A
Cited
US4279258A
Cited
US4417592A
Cited
US4493327A
Cited
US4545388A
Cited
US4557270A
Cited
US4610259A
Cited
US4705049A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1993-04-02 | 1993-10-02 | 1994-04-03 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1997-04-02 | 1997-10-02 | 1998-04-03 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2001-04-02 | 2001-10-02 | 2002-04-03 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |