US4871963A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method and apparatus for testing EPROM type semiconductor devices during burn-in
Assignee: STMicroelectronics SRL
•
Filing: 1988-10-17
•
Granted: 1989-10-03
•
Expires: 2008-10-17
Abstract
Abstract An apparatus and a relative method which permit carrying out a complete cycle of functional tests and parametric measurements on EPROM type semiconductor devices during their permanence inside a burn-in chamber, thus greatly reducing the time necessary for testing and classifying the devices, besides ensuring a higher reliability. The system utilizes special "intelligent" cards, i.e., provided with a card microprocessor which may be connected to a supervisory system's CPU directing the test and classification process of the devices.
Inventors
- 👤 Lucio Cozzi
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 08:32
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R31/00; G01R31/28; G01R31/2851; G01R31/2855; G01R31/286; G01R31/2868; G01R31/26; G01R31/2642; G11; G11C; G11C29/00; G11C29/04; G11C29/50; G11C29/50012; G11C29/50016; G11C16/00; G11C16/02; G11C16/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 2
Claim 1
Independent Claim
273 words
A process for functional testing and for determining the characteristics of EPROM type semiconductor devices during a burn-in treatment, characterized by the following steps: (A) programming an "all 0" pattern the cells of the EPROM devices as received from the assembly lines; (B) loading of the devices into tubes and storing at a temperature equal to or greater than 170° C. for at least 72 hours; (C) automatic loading of single devices from said tubes on cards provided with suitable sockets; verification of the validity of the data programmed during step (A) and automatic rejection of nonvalidated devices; (D) dynamic burn-in treatment at a temperature equal to or greater than 125° C. carried out in a burn-in chamber and subjecting the devices plugged into said sockets of said cards to the following tests while said devices are maintained in said burn-in treatment chamber: (i) verification of the "0" status of all the EPROM cells; (ii) erasing; (iii) programming of a test pattern; (iv) verification of the test pattern; (v) repetition of steps (ii), (iii) and (iv) for a "n" number of different test patterns; (vi) classification of the single devices according to particular quality classes; (vii) programming of a special pattern for subsequent testing; (E) automatic unplugging of the devices from the sockets of said cards and their classification by automatic insertion of the devices into classified tubes in accordance with particular quality grades; (F) testing of dynamic (TAC) parameters of the devices and further classification of devices in function of the determined individual dynamic characteristics; (G) stamping of the devices and final erasing of the data still present in the memory cells.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
273 words
A process for functional testing and for determining the characteristics of EPROM type semiconductor devices during a burn-in treatment, characterized by the following steps: (A) programming an "all 0" pattern the cells of the EPROM devices as received from the assembly lines; (B) loading of the devices into tubes and storing at a temperature equal to or greater than 170° C. for at least 72 hours; (C) automatic loading of single devices from said tubes on cards provided with suitable sockets; verification of the validity of the data programmed during step (A) and automatic rejection of nonvalidated devices; (D) dynamic burn-in treatment at a temperature equal to or greater than 125° C. carried out in a burn-in chamber and subjecting the devices plugged into said sockets of said cards to the following tests while said devices are maintained in said burn-in treatment chamber: (i) verification of the "0" status of all the EPROM cells; (ii) erasing; (iii) programming of a test pattern; (iv) verification of the test pattern; (v) repetition of steps (ii), (iii) and (iv) for a "n" number of different test patterns; (vi) classification of the single devices according to particular quality classes; (vii) programming of a special pattern for subsequent testing; (E) automatic unplugging of the devices from the sockets of said cards and their classification by automatic insertion of the devices into classified tubes in accordance with particular quality grades; (F) testing of dynamic (TAC) parameters of the devices and further classification of devices in function of the determined individual dynamic characteristics; (G) stamping of the devices and final erasing of the data still present in the memory cells.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-10-02 | 1993-04-03 | 1993-10-03 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-10-02 | 1997-04-03 | 1997-10-03 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-10-02 | 2001-04-03 | 2001-10-03 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |