Patent US4858738A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4858738A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System of auxiliary mass dampers to restrain the response of slender elastic structures to vibrations such as from earthquakes
Assignee: Individual
•
Filing: 1985-02-20
•
Granted: 1989-08-22
•
Expires: 2005-02-20
Abstract
Abstract Structures subject to seismic or other vibrations, such as structurally flexible elements of electrical and mechanical power plants, are effectively damped to reduce stresses resulting from such vibrations, by a system of auxiliary mass dampers. The dampers are advantageously connected to the regions of greater expected oscillation in response to such vibrations, to reduce structural stresses. A preferred auxiliary mass damper takes the form of a receptacle containing a fluent or granular material such as lead birdshot in mineral oil.
Inventors
- 👤 Fernando Novoa
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-26 07:48
CPC Classifications
H; H02; H02B; H02B1/00; H02B1/54; F; F16; F16F; F16F7/00; F16F7/10; F16L; F16L55/00; F16L55/04; H02B13/00; H02B13/02; H02B13/035; H02B5/00; H02B5/06
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 3
Claim 1
Independent Claim
353 words
A method for damping vibration of a slender, elastic structural element which, on account of being fixed by at least one end to a base subjected to earthquake, is subject to a high oscillatory response, owing to its inherent functional design, said method comprising: providing at least one receptacle constructed and arranged for moving together with a respective point of maximum displacement response to said element in a principal oscillatory mode thereof; filling into each said receptacle a quantity of ballast in the form of a loose mass of material, so that the ballast is contained by the receptacle but is able to move freely therein so that the total mass of all of such ballast is 10-20 percent of the principal mass of said element, thereby constituting at least one auxiliary mass damper; rigidly attaching each said auxiliary mass damper to said element at a respective point close to a respective said point of maximum displacement response so that, as said element is subjected to earthquake: (a) the apparent frequency of movement of the respective said ballast within each respective said receptacle is somewhat different than the natural frequency of oscillation of said element alone, but within 20 percent of that value, (b) the freedom of movement of the respective said ballast within each respective said receptacle allows for an oscillatory displacement of the center of gravity of each respective said receptacle with respect to the center of gravity of the respective said ballast that is at least several times greater than the maximal oscillatory response of said element at the respective said point of attachment of said receptacle, and (c) the damping of the oscillatory movement of the ballast by friction is equivalent to 10-20 percent of the critical ratio of such movement, so that, in respect of said principal mode of oscillation of said element, the oscillatory energy of said element is first dynamically converted into higher-displacement oscillations of the mass of said ballast and finally dissipated by the inherent friction of the oscillating ballast so as to counteract the tendency of said structural element to vibrate during an earthquake.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
353 words
A method for damping vibration of a slender, elastic structural element which, on account of being fixed by at least one end to a base subjected to earthquake, is subject to a high oscillatory response, owing to its inherent functional design, said method comprising: providing at least one receptacle constructed and arranged for moving together with a respective point of maximum displacement response to said element in a principal oscillatory mode thereof; filling into each said receptacle a quantity of ballast in the form of a loose mass of material, so that the ballast is contained by the receptacle but is able to move freely therein so that the total mass of all of such ballast is 10-20 percent of the principal mass of said element, thereby constituting at least one auxiliary mass damper; rigidly attaching each said auxiliary mass damper to said element at a respective point close to a respective said point of maximum displacement response so that, as said element is subjected to earthquake: (a) the apparent frequency of movement of the respective said ballast within each respective said receptacle is somewhat different than the natural frequency of oscillation of said element alone, but within 20 percent of that value, (b) the freedom of movement of the respective said ballast within each respective said receptacle allows for an oscillatory displacement of the center of gravity of each respective said receptacle with respect to the center of gravity of the respective said ballast that is at least several times greater than the maximal oscillatory response of said element at the respective said point of attachment of said receptacle, and (c) the damping of the oscillatory movement of the ballast by friction is equivalent to 10-20 percent of the critical ratio of such movement, so that, in respect of said principal mode of oscillation of said element, the oscillatory energy of said element is first dynamically converted into higher-displacement oscillations of the mass of said ballast and finally dissipated by the inherent friction of the oscillating ballast so as to counteract the tendency of said structural element to vibrate during an earthquake.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
20 words
The method of claim 1, wherein: said at least one auxiliary mass damper comprises at least two auxiliary mass dampers.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US2732040A
Cited
US1995620A
Cited
US2375818A
Cited
US2417347A
Cited
US2469167A
Cited
US2667237A
Cited
US2715951A
Cited
US2846028A
Cited
US3006656A
Cited
US3110262A
Cited
US3331398A
Cited
US3336818A
Cited
US3637051A
Cited
US3938625A
Cited
US3911199A
Cited
US3973078A
Cited
DE2533088A1
Cited
US4320602A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-08-21 | 1993-02-20 | 1993-08-22 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-08-21 | 1997-02-20 | 1997-08-22 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-08-21 | 2001-02-20 | 2001-08-22 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |