Patent US4853882A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4853882A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
System and method for protecting against redundant mailings
Assignee: NCH-NUWORLD HOLDINGS Inc
•
Filing: 1987-11-02
•
Granted: 1989-08-01
•
Expires: 2007-11-02
Abstract
Abstract A system and method for protecting against redundant mailings compile mail listings associated with, for example, refund promotion requests received during a given period of time for a number of different refund promotions. Each listing in the compilation is compared on an automated basis with one or more other listings in the compilation according to one or more rules defining a first statistically significant event to identify suspicious listings. Listings in the compilation are also compared on an automated basis to listings previously identified as suspicious and may also be compared to listings associated with known abusers and complainers. Listings identified as suspicious are thereafter compared on an automated basis according to one or more different rules defining a second statistically significant event to identify redundant mailings.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert Marshall
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-26 17:50
CPC Classifications
G; G06; G06Q; G06Q99/00; G06Q30/00; G06Q30/02; G06Q30/0241; G06Q30/0251; G06Q30/0254; G06Q30/0273; G06Q40/00; G06Q40/12
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 63
Claim 1
Independent Claim
60 words
A system for purifying a mailing list to protect against redundant mailings, said mailing list having a plurality of listings comprising: automated means for identifying suspicious listings in said mailing list according to a first statistically significant event; and automated redundant listing identifying means for analyzing said suspicious listings according to a second statistically significant event to identify redundant mailings.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
60 words
A system for purifying a mailing list to protect against redundant mailings, said mailing list having a plurality of listings comprising: automated means for identifying suspicious listings in said mailing list according to a first statistically significant event; and automated redundant listing identifying means for analyzing said suspicious listings according to a second statistically significant event to identify redundant mailings.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
66 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 further including means for storing first data indicative of listings previously identified as suspicious, said suspicious listing identifying means including automated means for comparing second data indicative of a listing in said mailing list to said first data in said storage means according to at least one rule defining said first statistically significant event.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
66 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 further including means for storing first data indicative of listings for persons known to have had multiple listings, said suspicious listing identifying means including automated means for comparing second data indicative of a listing in said mailing list to said first data according to one or more rules defining said first statistically significant event.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
65 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 further including means for storing a plurality of rules, each rule defining a second statistically significant event; and automated means for selecting at least one of said rules, said redundant listing identifying means being responsive to said selecting means for automatically applying selected rules to listings identified as suspicious to identify redundant mailings.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
59 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing listings according to a plurality of rules including one rule requiring a given percentage of letters in a portion of one listing to be in common with the letters in a corresponding portion of a second listing.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
59 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing listings according to a plurality of rules including one rule requiring a given percentage of numbers in a portion of one listing to be in common with the numbers in a corresponding portion of a second listing.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
31 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing listings according to a plurality of rules in series.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
30 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing listings according to a plurality of cascaded rules.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
88 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein each of said listings includes a surname and said suspicious listing identifying means includes means for comparing the first N letters of surname of a first listing, N being an integer, with the first N letters of surname of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first listing being identified as suspicious if the first N letters of the surnames of said listings match.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
94 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein each of said listings includes a street address and said suspicious listing identifying means includes means for comparing the first N numbers of a street address for a first listing, N being an integer, with the first N numbers of a street address for a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first listing being identified as suspicious if the first N numbers of the street addresses of said listings match.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
101 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein each of said listings includes a surname and said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing the letters of a surname of a first listing with the letters of a surname of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first and second listings being identified as redundant if at least a given percentage of the letters in the surname of the first listing are in common with the letters in the surname of the second listing.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
106 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein each of said listings includes a street address and said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing the letters of the street address for a first listing to the letters of a street address for a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first and second listings being identified as redundant if at least a given percentage of the letters in the street address of the first listing are in common with the letters in the street address of the second listing.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
110 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein each of said listings includes a street address and said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing the first an numbers of a street address of a first listing with the first N numbers of a street address of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first an second listings being identified as redundant if X out of the N numbers of the street addresses for said first and second listings match wherein X and N are integers with X being no greater than N.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
114 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein each of said listings includes a street address having at least one number and letters and said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing the street address of a first listing to the street address of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of the first listing, said first and second listings being identified as redundant if at least a given percentage of a total of the numbers and letters in the street address of the first listing are in common with the numbers and letters in the street address of the second listing.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
127 words
A system for purifying a mailing list as recited in claim 1 wherein each of said listings includes a surname having letters and a street address having at least one number and letters and said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing the surname and street address of a first listing with the surname and street address of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of the first listing, said first and second listings being identified as redundant if at least a given percentage of a total of the numbers and letters in the surname and street address of the first listing are in common with the numbers and letters in the surname and street address of the second listing.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
61 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests in a refund request mail listing compilation comprising: automated means for identifying suspicious listings in said compilation according to at least one first statistically significant event; and automated redundant listing identifying means for analyzing said suspicious listings according to at least one second statistically significant event to identify redundant refund requests.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
61 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests in a refund request mail listing compilation comprising: automated means for identifying suspicious listings in said compilation according to at least one first statistically significant event; and automated redundant listing identifying means for analyzing said suspicious listings according to at least one second statistically significant event to identify redundant refund requests.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
60 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 further including means for storing first data indicative of listings previously identified as suspicious, said suspicious listing identifying means including means for comparing second data indicative of a listing to said first data according to at least one rule defining said first statistically significant event.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
72 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 further including a means for storing first data indicative of listings for persons known to be abusers of refund promotions, said suspicious listing identifying means including means for comparing second data indicative of a listing currently being processed by said system to said first data according to at least one rule defining said first statistically significant event.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
79 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 further including means for storing a plurality of rules, each rule defining a statistically significant event; and automated means for selecting at least one of said rules, said redundant listing identifying means being responsive to the selection of one or more rules by said selecting means for applying said at least one rule to listings previously identified as suspicious to identify redundant refund requests.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
62 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing listings according to a plurality of rules including one rule requiring a given percentage of letters in a portion of one listing to be in common with the letters in a corresponding portion of a second listing.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
62 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing listings according to a plurality of rules including one rule requiring a given percentage of numbers in a portion of one listing to be in common with the numbers in a corresponding portion of a second listing.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
45 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing listings according to a plurality of rules, said comparison means applying to a listing each of said rules in series.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
33 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing listings according to a plurality of cascaded rules.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
93 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein each of said listings includes a surname and said suspicious listing identifying means includes means for comparing the first N letters of a surname of a first listing, N being an integer, with the first N letters of a surname of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first listing being identified as suspicious if the first N letters of the surnames of said listings match.
Claim 27
Dependent Claim
97 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein each of said listings includes a street address and said suspicious listing identifying means includes means for comparing the first N numbers of a street address for a first listing, N being an integer, with the first N numbers of a street address for a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first listing being identified as suspicious if the first N numbers of the street addresses of said listings match.
Claim 28
Dependent Claim
106 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein each of said listings includes a surname and said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing the letters of a surname of a first listing with the letters of a surname of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first and second listings being identified as redundant refund requests if at least a given percentage of the letters in the surname of the first listing are in common with the letters in the surname of the second listing.
Claim 29
Dependent Claim
111 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein each of said listings includes a street address and said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing the letters of the street address for a first listing to the letters of a street address for a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first and second listings being identified as redundant refund requests if at least a given percentage of the letters in the street address of the first listing are in common with the letters in the street address of the second listing.
Claim 30
Dependent Claim
115 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein each of said listings includes a street address and said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing the first N numbers of a street address of a first listing with the first N numbers of a street address of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first and second listings being identified as redundant refund requests if X out of the N numbers of the street addresses for said first and second listings match wherein X and N are integers with X being no greater than N.
Claim 31
Dependent Claim
122 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein each of said listings includes a street address having at least one number and letters and said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing the street address of a first listing to the street address of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of the first listing, the refund requests of said first and second listings being identified as redundant requests if at least a given percentage of a total of the numbers and letters in the street address of the first listing are in common with the numbers and letters in the street address of the second listing.
Claim 32
Dependent Claim
132 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein each of said listings includes a surname having letters and a street address having at least one number and letters and said redundant listing identifying means includes means for comparing the surname and street address of a first listing with the surname and street address of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of the first listing, said first and second listings being identified as redundant fund requests if at least a given percentage of a total of the numbers and letters in the surname and street address of the first listing are in common with the numbers and letters in the surname and street address of the second listing.
Claim 33
Dependent Claim
80 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 16 wherein said suspicious listing identifying means includes means for comparing first data indicative of a first listing for a refund request received in a given time period for a first promotion to second data indicative of a second listing for a refund request received in said given time period for a different promotion according to at least one rule defining said first statistically significant event.
Claim 34
Dependent Claim
22 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 31 wherein said time period is one day.
Claim 35
Dependent Claim
62 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 31 further including means for storing first data indicative of listings identified as suspicious during a previous time period, said suspicious listing identifying means including means for comparing second data indicative of a listing in said compilation to said first data according to said at least one rule.
Claim 36
Dependent Claim
102 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests by a submitting entity with each request having an associated mail listing in a refund request mail listing compilation comprising: automated means for processing refund requests received for a plurality of promotions; said processing means including automated means for comparing a first listing for a refund request received for a first promotion in a time period to a second listing for a refund request received in said time period for a different promotion to determine whether the refund requests of the first and second listings are associated with the same submitting entity.
Claim 37
Dependent Claim
102 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests by a submitting entity with each request having an associated mail listing in a refund request mail listing compilation comprising: automated means for processing refund requests received for a plurality of promotions; said processing means including automated means for comparing a first listing for a refund request received for a first promotion in a time period to a second listing for a refund request received in said time period for a different promotion to determine whether the refund requests of the first and second listings are associated with the same submitting entity.
Claim 38
Dependent Claim
22 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 34 wherein said time period is one day.
Claim 39
Dependent Claim
79 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundants refund requests as recited in claim 34 further including means for storing data indicative of listings for refund requests received during a previous time period wherein said processing means further includes means for comparing said first data indicative of said first listing with second data indicative of other listings in said storage means to determine whether said first listing and another listing are for refund requests from the same submitting entity.
Claim 40
Dependent Claim
67 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 34 further including means for storing first data indicative of listings for persons known to be abusers of refund promotions, wherein said processing means further including means for comparing data indicative of said first listing to said first data to determine whether said first listing is associated with one of said known abusers.
Claim 41
Dependent Claim
96 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 34 wherein each of said listings includes a surname and said comparing means includes means for comparing the first N letters of a surname of a first listing, N being an integer, with the first N letters of a surname of a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first and second listings being identified as suspicious if the first N letters of the surnames of said first and second listings match.
Claim 42
Dependent Claim
99 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 34 wherein each of said listings includes a street address and said comparing means includes means for comparing the first N numbers of street address for a first listing, N being an integer, with the first N numbers of a street address for a second listing having a Zip Code the same as a Zip Code of said first listing, said first and second listings being identified as suspicious if the first N numbers of the street addresses of said first and second listings match.
Claim 43
Dependent Claim
102 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests, each of said requests having an associated mail listing formed of alpha-numeric characters in a refund request mail listing compilation, comprising: automated means for processing refund requests according to a plurality of rules to identify redundant requests; said processing means including automated means for comparing a portion of a first mail listing to a corresponding portion of a second mail listing to determine whether a given percentage of the characters in said portion of said first mail listing are in common with characters in the corresponding portion of said second mail listing.
Claim 44
Dependent Claim
102 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests, each of said requests having an associated mail listing formed of alpha-numeric characters in a refund request mail listing compilation, comprising: automated means for processing refund requests according to a plurality of rules to identify redundant requests; said processing means including automated means for comparing a portion of a first mail listing to a corresponding portion of a second mail listing to determine whether a given percentage of the characters in said portion of said first mail listing are in common with characters in the corresponding portion of said second mail listing.
Claim 45
Dependent Claim
94 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests, by one person, each of said requests having an associated mail listing in a refund request mail listing compilation, comprising: automated means for processing refund requests to identify redundant refund requests; said processing means including means for comparing one mail listing to other mail listings according to a plurality of rules, said comparing means applying each of said rules in series; and means responsive to said comparing means for identifying a mail listing as redundant if a predetermined number of said rules are satisfied.
Claim 46
Dependent Claim
94 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests, by one person, each of said requests having an associated mail listing in a refund request mail listing compilation, comprising: automated means for processing refund requests to identify redundant refund requests; said processing means including means for comparing one mail listing to other mail listings according to a plurality of rules, said comparing means applying each of said rules in series; and means responsive to said comparing means for identifying a mail listing as redundant if a predetermined number of said rules are satisfied.
Claim 47
Dependent Claim
106 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests, each of said requests having an associated mail listing in a refund request mail listing compilation, comprising: automated means for processing refund requests to identify multiple requests; said processing means including means for comparing mail listings according to a plurality of cascaded rules, said comparing means applying one rule to a group of mail listings and thereafter applying a second cascaded rule to at least a portion of said group of mail listings; and means responsive to said comparing means for identifying a mail listing as redundant if a predetermined number of said rules are satisfied.
Claim 48
Dependent Claim
106 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests, each of said requests having an associated mail listing in a refund request mail listing compilation, comprising: automated means for processing refund requests to identify multiple requests; said processing means including means for comparing mail listings according to a plurality of cascaded rules, said comparing means applying one rule to a group of mail listings and thereafter applying a second cascaded rule to at least a portion of said group of mail listings; and means responsive to said comparing means for identifying a mail listing as redundant if a predetermined number of said rules are satisfied.
Claim 49
Dependent Claim
133 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests, each of said requests having an associated mail listing formed of alphanumeric characters in a refund requests mail listing compilation, comprising: automated means for comparing portions of a first mail listing to corresponding portions of a second mail listing according to a plurality of weighted rules to determine whether said rules are satisfied; means responsive to said comparing means for accumulating for each mail listing a number of points for satisfying a rule, the number of points accumulated for the satisfaction of a given rule corresponding to the weight of said rule; and means responsive to the number of points accumulated for each listing for rejecting a refund request associated with a mail listing having at least a given number of accumulated points.
Claim 50
Dependent Claim
133 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests, each of said requests having an associated mail listing formed of alphanumeric characters in a refund requests mail listing compilation, comprising: automated means for comparing portions of a first mail listing to corresponding portions of a second mail listing according to a plurality of weighted rules to determine whether said rules are satisfied; means responsive to said comparing means for accumulating for each mail listing a number of points for satisfying a rule, the number of points accumulated for the satisfaction of a given rule corresponding to the weight of said rule; and means responsive to the number of points accumulated for each listing for rejecting a refund request associated with a mail listing having at least a given number of accumulated points.
Claim 51
Dependent Claim
48 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 43 further including means responsive to the points accumulated for each mail listing for flagging for an audit a mail listing with accumulated points, the number of which is less than said given number.
Claim 52
Dependent Claim
67 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 43 wherein said automated comparing means includes means for comparing a portion of said first listing to a corresponding portion of said second listing to determine whether a given percentage of the characters in said portion of said first listing are in common with characters in the corresponding portion of said second listing.
Claim 53
Dependent Claim
55 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 43 wherein said automated comparing means includes means for comparing the most significant characters in a portion of said first listing with the most significant characters in a corresponding portion of said second listing to determine whether said characters match identically.
Claim 54
Dependent Claim
54 words
A refund promotion monitoring system for identifying redundant refund requests as recited in claim 43 wherein said automated comparing means includes means for comparing digits in a numeric portion of said first listing with digits in a corresponding numeric portion of said second listing to determine whether a given number of said digits match.
Claim 55
Independent Claim
137 words
A method for monitoring a refund promotion to identify redundant refund requests, each of said requests having an associated mail listing, comprising: compiling a list of mail listings associated with refund requests received during a first period of time for a plurality of different refund promotions; comparing each listing in said list to other listings in said list according to at least one first rule defining a first statistically significant event to determine whether the receipt of the refund request associated with each listing is statistically significant; storing in a file listings associated with refund requests determined during said comparing step to be statistically significant; and comparing said listings stored in said file according to at least one second rule defining a second statistically significant event to determine whether said listings are associated with redundant refund requests.
Claim 56
Independent Claim
137 words
A method for monitoring a refund promotion to identify redundant refund requests, each of said requests having an associated mail listing, comprising: compiling a list of mail listings associated with refund requests received during a first period of time for a plurality of different refund promotions; comparing each listing in said list to other listings in said list according to at least one first rule defining a first statistically significant event to determine whether the receipt of the refund request associated with each listing is statistically significant; storing in a file listings associated with refund requests determined during said comparing step to be statistically significant; and comparing said listings stored in said file according to at least one second rule defining a second statistically significant event to determine whether said listings are associated with redundant refund requests.
Claim 57
Dependent Claim
61 words
A method for monitoring a refund promotion to identify redundant refund requests as recited in claim 48 further including the step of ordering said list of mailings compiled during said first period of time according to a first characteristic of said listings to allow said at least one first rule defining said first statistically significant event to be more easily applied.
Claim 58
Dependent Claim
63 words
A method for monitoring a refund promotion to identify redundant refund requests as recited in claim 48 further including the step of comparing a first listing in said list to listings previously identified as suspicious according to at least one rule defining a statistically significant event to determine whether the receipt of the refund request associated with said first listing is statistically significant.
Claim 59
Dependent Claim
62 words
A method for monitoring a refund promotion to identify redundant refund requests as recited in claim 48 further including the step of comparing a first listing in said list to listings of known abusers according to at least one rule defining a statistically significant event to determine whether the receipt of the refund request associated with said first listing is statistically significant.
Claim 60
Dependent Claim
64 words
A method for monitoring a refund promotion to identify redundant refund requests as recited in claim 48 wherein said step of comparing listings to identify redundant refund requests includes the steps of: comparing a first listing to other listings according to a first rule; and comparing said first listing to other listings according to a second rule applied in series with said first rule.
Claim 61
Dependent Claim
59 words
A method for monitoring a refund promotion to identify redundant refund requests as recited in claim 48 wherein said step of comparing listings to identify redundant refund requests includes the steps of applying a first rule to a group of listings and thereafter applying a second cascaded rule to at least a portion of the same group of listings.
Claim 62
Dependent Claim
51 words
A method for monitoring a refund promotion to identify redundant refund requests as recited in claim 53 further including the step of ordering, prior to applying said first rule, said group of listings according to a first characteristic of said listings to allow the first rule to be more easily applied.
Claim 63
Dependent Claim
56 words
A method for monitoring a refund promotion to identify redundant refund requests as recited in claim 54 further including the step of reordering according to a second characteristic of said listings at least a portion of said group of listings prior to applying the second rule to allow the second rule to be more easily applied.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-07-31 | 1993-01-30 | 1993-08-01 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-07-31 | 1997-01-30 | 1997-08-01 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-07-31 | 2001-01-30 | 2001-08-01 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |