Patent US4849645A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4849645A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Substrate inspection system having two scattered light detecting bundles orthogonally positioned to each other
Assignee: AT&T Inc
•
Filing: 1988-03-04
•
Granted: 1989-07-18
•
Expires: 2008-03-04
Abstract
Abstract Surface defects on a substrate (11) are detected by raster scanning the surface (10) with a laser beam (12). Light scattered by the substrate at a large angle with respect to a normal to the surface is collected by at least two bundles of light guide fibers (21,22) located nearly in the plane of the substrate surface, one fiber bundle parallel to the laser scan with the other positioned perpendicularly thereto. The light collected by each bundle is separately processed by a computer (20) to determine the size, in three dimensions, and orientation of defects on the substrate surface. In a preferred embodiment, four light guide fiber bundles (31,32,33 and 34) are used around the substrate surface with the outputs being separately processed.
Inventors
- 👤 Barry J. Mendenko
- 👤 Bruce M. Nyman
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 20:13
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01N; G01N21/00; G01N21/84; G01N21/88; G01N21/89; G01N21/8901; G01N21/17; G01N21/47; G01N2021/4704; G01N2021/4711; G01N2021/4719; G01N21/95; G01N21/956; G01N21/95607; G01N2021/95615; G01N21/94
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 19
Claim 1
Independent Claim
191 words
A method for detecting defects on a flat surface comprising the steps of scanning the surface with a laser beam, receiving light scattered from the surface at a large angle with respect to the surface normal, and comparing the reception of pulses of scattered light that exceed a threshold value with the location of the scanning beam at the time of the reception of such pulses to determine the location of a defect characterized by: independently receiving first light scattered predominantly only in a first direction from the flat surface; independently receiving second light scattered predominantly only in a second direction significantly different for the first direction from the flat surface; using the location of the scanning beam during the reception of any first light in the form of a pulse that exceeds a threshold value to determine the size in a first dimension of a defect causing the light pulse; and using the location of the scanning beam during the reception of any second light in the form of a pulse that exceeds a threshold to determine the size in a second dimension of a defect causing the light pulse.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
191 words
A method for detecting defects on a flat surface comprising the steps of scanning the surface with a laser beam, receiving light scattered from the surface at a large angle with respect to the surface normal, and comparing the reception of pulses of scattered light that exceed a threshold value with the location of the scanning beam at the time of the reception of such pulses to determine the location of a defect characterized by: independently receiving first light scattered predominantly only in a first direction from the flat surface; independently receiving second light scattered predominantly only in a second direction significantly different for the first direction from the flat surface; using the location of the scanning beam during the reception of any first light in the form of a pulse that exceeds a threshold value to determine the size in a first dimension of a defect causing the light pulse; and using the location of the scanning beam during the reception of any second light in the form of a pulse that exceeds a threshold to determine the size in a second dimension of a defect causing the light pulse.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
40 words
The method in claim 1 further characterized in that: the light received by the first and second light guides is scattered at a very high angle of more than about 80 degrees with respect to a normal to the surface.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
64 words
The method of claim 2 further characterized in that: the second direction is substantially orthogonal to the first direction; the first light guides are arranged in a first row along a first edge of the planar surface; and the second light guides are arranged in a second row along a second edge of the planar surface which is substantially orthogonal to the first row.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
59 words
The method of claim 3 further characterized by: using the output of the first row of light guides to determine the length in the second direction of any defect on the planar surface, and using the output of the second row of light guides to determine the length in the first direction of any defect on the planar surface.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
58 words
The method of claim 4 further characterized by: detecting the Fourier frequency content of light scattered by defects; determining whether such frequency content contains a relatively large quantity of high frequencies or a relative large quantity of low frequencies; and designating those with a high frequency content as burrs and those with a low frequency content as pits.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
155 words
The method of claim 3 further characterized in that third light guides are arranged in a third row along a third edge of the planar surface substantially parallel to the first row; fourth light guides are arranged in a fourth row along a fourth edge of the planar surface substantially parallel to the second row; the third light guides are connected to a third detector arranged to convert to electrical information light scattered from the surface in a third direction substantially opposite the first direction; the fourth light guides are connected to a fourth detector arranged to convert to electrical information light scattered from the surface in a fourth direction substantially opposite the second direction; information from the third and fourth detectors is separately channeled to the computer; and the computer is used to compare separate information from the third detector with third stored information and information from the fourth detector with fourth stored information.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 6 further characterized by: combining information from the four detectors with information describing the location of the laser beam scan to determine the dimensions of any defect or particle detected.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
44 words
The method of claim 7 further characterized by: determining whether light is first scattered by a defect in the direction of beam scan or opposite the direction of beam scan; and using that determination to designate the defect as a pit or a burr.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 8 further characterized in that the flat surface is a surface of a ceramic substrate.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
155 words
A method for detecting small defects or particles on a surface comprising the steps of arranging a plurality of light guides near the periphery of the surface, scanning the surface with a laser beam, and analyzing light scattered from the surface and received by the light guides characterized in that: the laser beam raster scans the surface in a first direction; first light guides are connected to a first detector arranged to convert to electrical information light scattered from the surface in the first direction; second light guides are connected to a second detector arranged to convert to electrical information light scattered from the surface in a second direction substantially orthogonal to the first direction; information from the first and second detectors is separately channeled to a computer; and the computer is used to compare separate information from the first detector with first stored information and information from the second detector with second stored information.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
155 words
A method for detecting small defects or particles on a surface comprising the steps of arranging a plurality of light guides near the periphery of the surface, scanning the surface with a laser beam, and analyzing light scattered from the surface and received by the light guides characterized in that: the laser beam raster scans the surface in a first direction; first light guides are connected to a first detector arranged to convert to electrical information light scattered from the surface in the first direction; second light guides are connected to a second detector arranged to convert to electrical information light scattered from the surface in a second direction substantially orthogonal to the first direction; information from the first and second detectors is separately channeled to a computer; and the computer is used to compare separate information from the first detector with first stored information and information from the second detector with second stored information.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
83 words
The method of claim 10 further characterized in that a first and second light guides are positioned so as to receive light scattered at a very high angle of more than about 80 degrees with respect to a normal to the surface; the first light guides are arranged in a first row along a first edge of the surface; and the second light guides are arranged in a second row along a second edge of the surface substantially orthogonal to the first row.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
51 words
The method of claim 11 further characterized by using the output of the first detector to determine the dimension in the second direction of any defect on the surface; and using the output of the second detector to determine the dimension in the first direction of any defect on the surface.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
101 words
The method of claim 10 further characterized in that the ends of the fibers that receive the scattered light are located along an edge of the flat surface so as to receive light scattered at a high angle with respect to the surface normal; determining which scattered light received by the optical fibers exceeds a threshold value; comparing the location of the optic fibers that receives light exceeding the threshold value with the position of the scanning laser beam on the flat surface at the time of such reception to determine the dimensions and location of a defect on the surface.
Claim 16
Independent Claim
195 words
A method for detecting small defects or particles on a flat surface comprising the steps of arranging a plurality of optical fibers near the periphery of the surface such that one end of each fiber is capable of receiving light scattered from the surface, scanning the surface with a laser beam, and analyzing light scattered from the surface at a high angle with respect to surface normal and received by the optical fibers characterized in that the optical fibers are arranged in first, second, third and fourth arrays around the surface periphery, each fiber of each array extending in substantially the same direction; the first and third arrays being arranged on opposite sides of the surface and being substantially parallel; the second and fourth arrays being arranged in opposite sides of the surface, being substantially mutually parallel, and being orthogonal to the first and third arrays; the first, second, third and fourth arrays being respectively connected to first, second, third and fourth detectors; and information from the first, second, third and fourth detectors is separately analyzed with respect to the position of the scanning laser beam to determine the dimensions of any defect or particle.
Claim 17
Independent Claim
195 words
A method for detecting small defects or particles on a flat surface comprising the steps of arranging a plurality of optical fibers near the periphery of the surface such that one end of each fiber is capable of receiving light scattered from the surface, scanning the surface with a laser beam, and analyzing light scattered from the surface at a high angle with respect to surface normal and received by the optical fibers characterized in that the optical fibers are arranged in first, second, third and fourth arrays around the surface periphery, each fiber of each array extending in substantially the same direction; the first and third arrays being arranged on opposite sides of the surface and being substantially parallel; the second and fourth arrays being arranged in opposite sides of the surface, being substantially mutually parallel, and being orthogonal to the first and third arrays; the first, second, third and fourth arrays being respectively connected to first, second, third and fourth detectors; and information from the first, second, third and fourth detectors is separately analyzed with respect to the position of the scanning laser beam to determine the dimensions of any defect or particle.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 14 further characterized by: determing whether light is first scattered by a defect in the direction of laser beam scan or opposite the direction of laser beam scan; and designating those defects in which light is first scattered in the direction beam scan as a pit and those defects in which light is first scattered opposite the direction of beam scan as a pit.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
57 words
The method of claim 14 wherein the flat surface is a substrate surface containing a plurality of substantially parallel conductors extending predominantly in a first direction characterized by arranging the substrate with respect to the scanning laser beam such that the beam scans the surface at substantially a 45 degree angle with respect to the first direction.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1992-07-17 | 1993-01-16 | 1993-07-18 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1996-07-17 | 1997-01-16 | 1997-07-18 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 2000-07-17 | 2001-01-16 | 2001-07-18 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |