Electrical contact

Claim 2

A low insertion force, microminiature contact resulting from the die formation of a resilient, electrically conductive material of fabrication; said contact having a first generally tubular portion formed by said die formation comprising at least two cantilever spring leaves having proximal ends extending from an inner annulus comprising a continuous periphery and terminal distal ends; a second tubular portion extending from said annulus in a direction opposite to said leaves; said first and second tubular portions and the interconnecting annulus being integrally formed in the course of said die formation of said resilient material of fabrication; said leaves being in substantially parallel, spaced relationship relative to the contact longitudinal axis; central portions of said leaves between said proximal and distal ends being bowed outwardly relative to said longitudinal axis so as to define portions of a maximum circumference defined by said leaves and the said terminal distal ends being fused for restricting the independent longitudinal movement of any one of said leaves relative to the other whereby insertion of said first contact portion in a mating socket having a receiving opening smaller than said maximum circumference results in substantially uniform resilient flexing of the leaf portions to assure electrical contact to said leaves with the inner periphery of said socket.

Claim 3

The contact of claim 1 in which said contact comprises a seamless, integral, extruded member formed of an extrudable copper-based alloy and said leaves are separate resilient cantilever elements.

Claim 4

The contact of claim 1 in which said cantilever leaves are substantially flat.

Claim 5

The contact of claim 1 in which each leaf is of such cross-section as to effect engagement along opposed longitudinal edges when received in a cylindrical socket of such size as to receive said first tubular contact portion and force said leaves together.

Claim 6

The contact of claim 1 in which said contact second portion is integrally joined with a third contact portion having a slotted, compliant barrel portion adapted to reduce in cross-section in the course of being received in the opening of a receiving socket having a cross-section smaller than that defined by said compliant barrel portion.

Claim 7

The contact of claim 5 in which said third contact portion is of substantially C-shaped cross-sectional configuration and has a longitudinal slot which is of greater width intermediate the ends of said third contact portion whereby said intermediate slotted portion of said third contact portion may resiliently deform when received in such receiving socket opening; said third contact portion having a cross-section which is smaller than the cross-section of said contact second tubular portion.

Claim 8

A low insertion force, microminiature contact formed by the deep drawing of resilient, electrically conductive material such as spinodal alloy or the like and having a first generally tubular portion comprising at least four spaced cantilever spring leaves having proximal ends extending from an inner annulus comprising a continuous periphery and terminal distal ends; a second tubular portion for receiving a conductor and connected to said first tubular portion by said annulus; said first and second tubular portions and the interconnecting annulus being drawn as an integral member from said resilient material; said cantilever spring leaves being separated by slots in substantially uniform, spaced relationship relative to the contact longitudinal axis; central portions of said leaves between said proximal and distal ends being bowed outwardly relative to said longitudinal axis so as to define contact portions or maximum circumference defined by said leaves and separated by portions of said slots of maximum width and said terminal distal ends being fused for restricting the independent longitudinal movement of any one of said cantilever spring leaves relative to the other whereby insertion of said first contact portion in a mating socket having a receiving opening smaller than said maximum circumference results in substantially uniform resilient flexing of the cantilever spring leaf portions to assure electrical contact of said leaves with the inner periphery of said socket.

Claim 9

A low insertion force, microminiature contact formed by the deep drawing of resilient, electrically conductive material such as spinodal alloy or the like and having a first generally tubular portion comprising at least four spaced cantilever spring leaves having proximal ends extending from an inner annulus comprising a continuous periphery and terminal distal ends; a second tubular portion for receiving a conductor and connected to said first tubular portion by said annulus; said first and second tubular portions and the interconnecting annulus being drawn as an integral member from said resilient material; said cantilever spring leaves being separated by slots in substantially uniform, spaced relationship relative to the contact longitudinal axis; central portions of said leaves between said proximal and distal ends being bowed outwardly relative to said longitudinal axis so as to define contact portions or maximum circumference defined by said leaves and separated by portions of said slots of maximum width and said terminal distal ends being fused for restricting the independent longitudinal movement of any one of said cantilever spring leaves relative to the other whereby insertion of said first contact portion in a mating socket having a receiving opening smaller than said maximum circumference results in substantially uniform resilient flexing of the cantilever spring leaf portions to assure electrical contact of said leaves with the inner periphery of said socket.

Claim 10

The electrical contact of claim 1 or 7 in which said contact is approximately one-quarter inch in length, and is formed of an electrically conductive material of approximately 0.005 inch in thickness.

Claim 11

The low-insertion force contact of claim 7 in which said contact tubular segments have a nominal diameter of about 0.026 inch, and said tubular segments are received in receptacle openings having diameters of approximately 0.0222 inch.

Claim 12

In combination, a plurality of micro-miniature contacts of claim 7 arranged on centers of approximately 0.05 inch in a receiving receptacles.

Claim 13

The contact of claim 1 or 7 in which said first and said second tubular portions are of different average diameters.

Claim 14

The contact of claim 7 in which the unslotted length of the contact tube comprises a conductor receptacle adapted to be compressed into secure electrical engagement with a conductor receivable therein.

Claim 17

The method of claim 13 in which the tubular configuration is drawn so as to have a length-to-width ratio of greater than 5 to 1.