Display tube having improved brightness distribution

Claim 2

A projection television display tube comprising an envelope having an optically transparent substantially rectangular faceplate, the internal surface of the faceplate being convex as viewed from the interior of the envelope, a multilayer interference filter on the internal surface of the faceplate, and a cathodoluminescent screen on the filter, the layers of the filter each having an optical thickness nd at the center of the filter wherein n is the refractive index of the material of the layer and d is the thickness, the optical thickness of the individual layers being between 0.2λ f and 0.3λ f , the average optical thickness being 0.25λ f , wherein λ f is equal to pλ, where λ is the desired central wavelength which is selected from the spectrum emitted by the luminescent material and p is a number between 1.18 and 1.32, and wherein the cut-off angle of the filter is greater at the corners than at the center, the cut-off angle being the minimum angle at which light of a given wavelength is reflected rather than transmitted.

Claim 3

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 1, wherein the optical thickness of each of the filter layers, hence p and λ f , is greater at the corners than at the center.

Claim 4

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 2, wherein the optical thickness of each of the filter layers increases progressively from the center to the corners.

Claim 5

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 2, wherein the thickness of each filter layer is greater at the corners than at the center and the refractive index of the material of each layer is substantially constant.

Claim 6

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 2, wherein the thickness of each filter layer is greater at the corners than at the center and the refractive index of the material at the center of each layer is slightly different relative to that at the corners.

Claim 7

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 4 or 5, wherein the faceplate has a rectangular profile and, relative to the layer thickness at the center of the faceplate, the layer thickness at the ends of the shorter y-axis is less than at the center and the layer thickness at the ends of the longer x-axis is greater than at the center.

Claim 8

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 4 or 5 wherein the internal surface of the faceplate is substantially spherical and the variation in the thickness of each of the layers, relative to its thickness at the centre, is such that the thickness at the ends of the y-axis is smaller than at the centre and the thickness at the ends of the x-axis and at the ends of the diagonals is greater than at the centre, and wherein the layer thickness at the ends of the diagonals is less than the thickness at x max but greater than at the centre.

Claim 9

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 7, wherein the spherical surface has a radius of curvature of 350 mm.

Claim 10

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 4, wherein the internal surface of the faceplate is aspherical.

Claim 11

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 9, wherein the internal surface of the aspherical faceplate has a larger curvature near the center of the faceplate and a smaller or substantially no curvature at larger distances from the center, particularly in the proximity of the corners, and wherein the variation in the thickness of the layers, relative to their thickness at the center, is such that the thickness at the ends of the y-axis is smaller than at the center and the thickness at the ends of the x-axis and at the ends of the diagonals is greater than at the center, and the layer thickness at the ends of the diagonals is less than the thickness at the ends of the x-axis but greater than at the center.

Claim 12

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 10, wherein the aspherical surface has a curvature close to or equal to 350 mm near the center of the faceplate and becomes less curved at larger distances from the center, ending with a curvature between 500 mm and infinity in the corners.

Claim 13

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 10, wherein the central region of the convex faceplate is substantially spherical with a radius of curvature between 300 and 400 mm, the region beyond the central region is substantially conical having an infinite radius of curvature, and the conical region extends tangentially from the central spherical region.

Claim 14

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 9, wherein the radius of curvature of the internal surface of the faceplate is larger at a central region than at the outer region.

Claim 15

A projection television display tube as in claim 1 wherein the interference filter comprises alternate layers of high and low refractive index materials.

Claim 16

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 14, wherein the high refractive index material is selected from the group consisting of TiO 2 , Ta 2 O 5 and Nb 2 O 5 .

Claim 17

A projection television display tube as claimed in claim 14 or 15, wherein the low refractive index material is selected from the group consisting of SiO 2 and MgF 2 .

Claim 18

A projection television display tube as in claim 1, wherein the interference filter comprises at least 9 layers.

Claim 19

A projection television display tube as in claim 1, wherein the filter has between 14 and 30 layers.

Claim 20

A projection television system including three projection television display tubes respectively having cathodoluminescent screens luminescing in different colors, focusing lens means associated with each display tube screens are merged to form a multicolored image, wherein each tube has a substantially rectangular faceplate which is convex as viewed from inside the envelope, at least one display tube has a multilayer interference filter between its cathodoluminescent screen and its faceplate, the filter comprising at least 6 layers each having an optical thickness nd at the center of the filter, wherein n is the refractive index of the material of the layer and d is the thickness, the optical thickness of the individual layers of the filter being between 0.2λ f , and 0.3λ f , the average optical thickness throughout the multilayer stack being 0.25λ f wherein λ f is equal to pλ, where λ is the desired central wavelength which is selected from the spectrum emitted by the lumninescent material and p is a number between 1.18 and 1.32, and wherein the cut-off angle is greater at the corners than at the center, the cut-off angle being the minimum angle at which light of a given wavelength is reflected rather than transmitted.

Claim 21

A projection television system including three projection television display tubes respectively having cathodoluminescent screens luminescing in different colors, focusing lens means associated with each display tube screens are merged to form a multicolored image, wherein each tube has a substantially rectangular faceplate which is convex as viewed from inside the envelope, at least one display tube has a multilayer interference filter between its cathodoluminescent screen and its faceplate, the filter comprising at least 6 layers each having an optical thickness nd at the center of the filter, wherein n is the refractive index of the material of the layer and d is the thickness, the optical thickness of the individual layers of the filter being between 0.2λ f , and 0.3λ f , the average optical thickness throughout the multilayer stack being 0.25λ f wherein λ f is equal to pλ, where λ is the desired central wavelength which is selected from the spectrum emitted by the lumninescent material and p is a number between 1.18 and 1.32, and wherein the cut-off angle is greater at the corners than at the center, the cut-off angle being the minimum angle at which light of a given wavelength is reflected rather than transmitted.

Claim 22

A system as claimed in claim 19, wherein the focusing lens means has a focal length of less than 100 mm.

Claim 23

A system as claimed in claim 19, wherein the optical thickness of each of the filter layers, hence p and λ f , is greater at the corners than at the center.

Claim 24

A system as claimed in claim 21, wherein the optical thickness of each of the filter layers increases progressively from the center to the corners.

Claim 25

A system as claimed in claim 21, wherein the thickness of each filter layer is greater at the corners than at the center and the refractive index of the material of each layer is substantially constant.

Claim 26

A system as claimed in claim 21, wherein the thickness of each filter layer is greater at the corners than at the center and the refractive index of the material at the center of each layer is slightly different relative to that at the corners.

Claim 27

A system as claimed in claim 23, wherein the convex faceplate has a rectangular profile and, relative to the layer thickness at the center of the faceplate, the layer thickness at the end of the shorter y-axis is less than at the center and the layer thickness at the end of the longer x-axis is greater than at the centre.

Claim 28

A system as claimed in claim 23, wherein the internal surface of the convex faceplate is spherical and the variation in the optical thickness of the layers, relative to the optical thickness at the center is such that the optical thickness at the ends of the y-axis is smaller than at the centre and the thickness at the ends of the x-axis and at the ends of the diagonals is greater than at the centre, and wherein the layer thickness at the ends of the diagonals is less than the thickness at x max.

Claim 29

A system as claimed in claim 26, wherein the spherical surface has a radius of curvature of 350 mm.

Claim 30

A system as claimed in claim 27, wherein f+10000/rc<D where f is the focal length of the lens means, rc is the radius of curvature of the faceplate and D is the diagonal or diameter of the scanned phosphor area, f, rc and D being in millimeters.

Claim 31

A system as claimed in claim 25, wherein the internal surface of the faceplate is aspherical.

Claim 32

A system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the internal surface of the aspherical faceplate has a larger curvature near the center of the faceplate and a smaller or no curvature at larger distances from the center, particularly in the proximity of the corners, and wherein the variation in the thickness of each of the layers, relative to its thickness at the center, is such that the thickness at the ends of the y-axis is smaller than at the center and the thickness at the ends of the x-axis and at the ends of the diagonals is greater than at the center, and the layer thickness at the ends of the diagonals is less than the thickness at the ends of the x-axis but greater than at the center.

Claim 33

A system as claimed in claim 30, wherein the aspherical surface has a curvature close to or equal to 350 mm near the center of the faceplate and becomes less curved at larger distances from the center, ending with a curvature between 500 mm and infinity in the corners.

Claim 34

A system as claimed in claim 29, wherein the radius of curvature of the internal surface of the faceplate is larger at a central region than at the outer region.

Claim 35

A system as claimed in claim 19, wherein the interference filters comprises alternate layers of high and low refractive index materials.

Claim 36

A system as claimed in claim 33, wherein the high refractive index material is selected from the group consisting of TiO 2 , Ta 2 O 5 and Nb 2 O 5 .

Claim 37

A system as claimed in claim 33 or 34, wherein the low refractive index material is selected from the group consisting of SiO 2 and MgF 2 .

Claim 38

A system as claimed in claim 19, wherein the filter has between 14 and 30 layers.

Claim 39

A system as claimed in claim 23, wherein in at least one of the projection television display tubes the thickness of each of the filter layers increases in the x-direction and decreases in the y-direction and electronic means are provided for effecting color correction with a field frequency in the or in each display tube having the said thickness variation.

Claim 42

A method as claimed in claim 38, wherein a predetermined central area of the convex surface of the faceplate is masked intermittently by at least one shield as the faceplate is rotated relative to the electron gun.

Claim 43

A method as claimed in claim 38 or 39, wherein the calotte is concave viewed from the electron gun and each faceplate is disposed with its x-axis substantially radially of the calotte.

Claim 46

A method as claimed in claim 41, wherein the faceplate is rotated in a substantially planetary manner relative to the electron gun.