US4789935A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Suspension controller
Assignee: Toyota Motor Corp
•
Filing: 1986-11-14
•
Granted: 1988-12-06
•
Expires: 2006-11-14
Abstract
Abstract Provided is a suspension controller which has a plurality of control sections in a control mechanism and which has the order of priority among the suspension controls when two or more different suspension controls are simultaneously instructed from the control sections, so as to optimally control the suspension characteristic according to both the road condition and the running condition of the vehicle. The suspension controller of the invention includes a preference mechanism or logic for preferentially altering the suspension characteristic to a harder state in order to reduce the vibration of the vehicle body and to prevent an abrupt change of the vehicle attitude, thus providing good control, high stability and riding comfort.
Inventors
- 👤 Shuuichi Buma
- 👤 Toshio Onuma
- 👤 Kaoru Ohashi
- 👤 Masami Itou
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-23 23:46
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60G; B60G21/00; B60G21/02; B60G21/04; B60G21/05; B60G21/055; B60G21/0551; B60G21/0553; B60G21/0558; B60G17/00; B60G17/015; B60G17/016; B60G17/0165; B60G21/0556
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 9
Claim 1
Independent Claim
130 words
A suspension controller for a vehicle comprising: running condition detection means (M1) for detecting at least one of a vehicle height and a change in the vehicle operation; control means (M3) comprising a plurality of control sections each having a proper predetermined condition, each control section comparing the detected result of said running condition detection means (M1) with the predetermined condition and, if the result satisfies the condition, outputting a proper command to alter a suspension characteristic; preference means (M4) for selecting a preference command for altering the suspension characteristic to the hardest state among the proper commands outputted from the control sections of said control means (M3); and suspension characteristic alteration means (M2) for altering the suspension characteristic according to the preference command selected by said preference means (M4).
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
130 words
A suspension controller for a vehicle comprising: running condition detection means (M1) for detecting at least one of a vehicle height and a change in the vehicle operation; control means (M3) comprising a plurality of control sections each having a proper predetermined condition, each control section comparing the detected result of said running condition detection means (M1) with the predetermined condition and, if the result satisfies the condition, outputting a proper command to alter a suspension characteristic; preference means (M4) for selecting a preference command for altering the suspension characteristic to the hardest state among the proper commands outputted from the control sections of said control means (M3); and suspension characteristic alteration means (M2) for altering the suspension characteristic according to the preference command selected by said preference means (M4).
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
26 words
The suspension controller according to claim 1, wherein said control means (M3) comprises a shock control section, an attitude control section and a vibration control section.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
187 words
The suspension controller according to claim 2, wherein: the shock control section outputs a proper command for altering the suspension characteristic to a softer state when determining that a difference between the maximum value and the minimum value of a vehicle height detected as a road condition by said running condition detection means (M1) for a predetermined shock judgment time period is greater than or equal to a reference value; the attitude control section outputs a proper command for altering the suspension characteristic to a harder state when, judging from the change in vehicle operation as detected by said running condition detection means (M1), determining that the vehicle attitude is about to abruptly change; and the vibration control section outputs a proper command for altering the suspension characteristic to a harder state but no harder than the harder state set by the attitude control section when determining that a difference between the maximum value and the minimum value of the vehicle height, as detected by said running condition detection means (M1) for a predetermined shock judgment time period, is greater than or equal to another reference value.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
31 words
The suspension controller according to claim 3, wherein at least one of the predetermined conditions in the control sections of said control means (M3) varies in response to the vehicle speed.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
71 words
The suspension controller according to claim 3, wherein the vehicle height value used for the determination in the shock control section or the vibration control section is a converted vehicle height, which is converted based on a conversion table from an actual vehicle height value detected by said running condition detection means (M1) and which converts the actual vehicle height value in unequal intervals in the upper and lower extremities thereof.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
31 words
The suspension controller according to claim 2, wherein the attitude control section further comprises an anti-roll control part, an anti-squat control part, an anti-dive control part and an anti-shift-squat control part.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
31 words
The suspension controller according to claim 6, wherein at least one of the predetermined conditions in the control sections of said control means (M3) varies in response to the vehicle speed.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
71 words
The suspension controller according to claim 6, wherein the vehicle height value used for the determination in the shock control section or the vibration control section is a converted vehicle height, which is converted based on a conversion table from an actual vehicle height value detected by said running condition detection means (M1) and which converts the actual vehicle height value in unequal intervals in the upper and lower extremities thereof.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
JPS5631861A
Cited
JPS5963218A
Cited
US4526401A
Cited
DE3407260A1
Cited
JPS59186708A
Cited
US4610462A
Cited
US4648622A
Cited
JPS60183216A
Cited
JPS60193710A
Cited
US4639014A
Cited
US4685689A
Cited
JPS6136009A
Cited
US4691284A
Cited
US4669749A
Cited
US4634143A
Cited
US4693494A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-12-06 | 1992-06-06 | 1992-12-06 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-12-06 | 1996-06-06 | 1996-12-06 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-12-06 | 2000-06-06 | 2000-12-06 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |