Patent US4768346A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4768346A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Determining the coefficient of performance of a refrigeration system
Assignee: Honeywell Inc
•
Filing: 1987-08-26
•
Granted: 1988-09-06
•
Expires: 2007-08-26
Abstract
Abstract The disclosure involves a coefficient-of-performance (COP) diagnostic method involving the use of novel algorithms for determining performance manifested faults of vapor compression type refrigeration systems.
Inventors
- 👤 Anoop K. Mathur
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-27 21:06
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01L; G01L3/00; G01L3/26; F; F25; F25B; F25B49/00; F25B49/02; F25B2500/00; F25B2500/19
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 6
Claim 1
Independent Claim
331 words
A method for reducing the coefficient of performance to a design value from measured temperature conditions of a vapor compression type refrigeration system of the type having series arranged compressor, condenser and evaporator units and an electric motor for driving said compressor unit, said system further having a condenser water supply line and evaporator chilled water supply and return lines, said method comprising the steps of: storing a value (CWF) for the chilled water flow through said condenser; sensing the condenser water supply temperature (T con ), sensing the evaporator water supply and return temperatures (T chw ,in and T chw ,out), sensing the power input (φ) to said motor; calculating the cooling load (Q c )* from the expression Q c =CWF*(T chw ,in -T chw ,out); storing the manufacturers' performance data for said system comprising the condenser supply water design (T con ,D) and the evaporator return water design temperature (T chw ,D); storing a value (α temp ) which is the ratio of the required change in condenser temperature to a unit change in chilled water temperature to maintain the same rated chiller capacity; calculating the equivalent temperature (T r ) which compensates for variation from the given design temperatures from the expression T.sub.r =(T.sub.con -T.sub.con,D)/α.sub.temp -(T.sub.chw -T.sub.chw,D), storing experimentally determined coefficients b 1 , b 2 , and b 3 for the quadratic expression βcap=b.sub.1 +b.sub.2 *T.sub.r +b.sub.3 *(T.sub.r).sup.2 wherein β cap is the ratio of the available capacity (CAP) at the actual chilled water and condenser water conditions to the design capacity (CAP D ); calculating said β cap and said CAP; calculating the part-load ratio Γ load from the expression Γ load =Q c /CAP, storing experimentally determined coefficients a 1 , a 2 and a 3 for the quadratic expression δ.sub.pow =a.sub.1 +a.sub.2 *Γ.sub.load +a.sub.3 *(Γ.sub.load).sup.2 wherein δ pow is a fraction of full-load power, calculating the full-load power (PFL) from the expression PFL=φ*δ pow ; and calculating said COPA from the expression COPA=CAP/PFL.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
331 words
A method for reducing the coefficient of performance to a design value from measured temperature conditions of a vapor compression type refrigeration system of the type having series arranged compressor, condenser and evaporator units and an electric motor for driving said compressor unit, said system further having a condenser water supply line and evaporator chilled water supply and return lines, said method comprising the steps of: storing a value (CWF) for the chilled water flow through said condenser; sensing the condenser water supply temperature (T con ), sensing the evaporator water supply and return temperatures (T chw ,in and T chw ,out), sensing the power input (φ) to said motor; calculating the cooling load (Q c )* from the expression Q c =CWF*(T chw ,in -T chw ,out); storing the manufacturers' performance data for said system comprising the condenser supply water design (T con ,D) and the evaporator return water design temperature (T chw ,D); storing a value (α temp ) which is the ratio of the required change in condenser temperature to a unit change in chilled water temperature to maintain the same rated chiller capacity; calculating the equivalent temperature (T r ) which compensates for variation from the given design temperatures from the expression T.sub.r =(T.sub.con -T.sub.con,D)/α.sub.temp -(T.sub.chw -T.sub.chw,D), storing experimentally determined coefficients b 1 , b 2 , and b 3 for the quadratic expression βcap=b.sub.1 +b.sub.2 *T.sub.r +b.sub.3 *(T.sub.r).sup.2 wherein β cap is the ratio of the available capacity (CAP) at the actual chilled water and condenser water conditions to the design capacity (CAP D ); calculating said β cap and said CAP; calculating the part-load ratio Γ load from the expression Γ load =Q c /CAP, storing experimentally determined coefficients a 1 , a 2 and a 3 for the quadratic expression δ.sub.pow =a.sub.1 +a.sub.2 *Γ.sub.load +a.sub.3 *(Γ.sub.load).sup.2 wherein δ pow is a fraction of full-load power, calculating the full-load power (PFL) from the expression PFL=φ*δ pow ; and calculating said COPA from the expression COPA=CAP/PFL.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
117 words
A method according to claim 1 for normalizing said COPA from actual to design temperature conditions by using Carnot COPs including the steps of; calculating the Carnot COP from the expression COP1=(T.sub.con +460)/(T.sub.con -T.sub.chw); calculating the design COP (COPD) from the expression COP2=(T.sub.con,D +460)/(T.sub.con,D -T.sub.chw,D), calculating the normalized COP from the expression Ψ.sub.cop =COPa/COP2, storing experimentally determined coefficients c 1 , c 2 and C 3 for the quadratic expression θ.sub.norm =c.sub.1 +c.sub.2 *Ψ.sub.cop +c.sub.3 *(Ψcop).sup.2 wherein θ norm is the actual normalized COP, calculating said COPAN; and calculating the actual design COP (COPAD) from the expression COPAD=COPA/θ norm , said COPAD being the normalization of the actual full-load COP (COPA) to the COP at design conditions.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
26 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said T con ,D is approximately 85 degrees Fahrenheit and said T chw ,D is approximately 45 degrees Fahrenheit.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method according to claim 1 wherein said coefficients are: ______________________________________
a.sub.1 = 0.228 b.sub.1 = 0.998
a.sub.2 = 0.957 b.sub.2 = -0.0281
a.sub.3 = -0.184 b.sub.3 = -0.000567
______________________________________
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
19 words
A method according to claim 2 wherein said coefficients are: c 1 =-0.002 c 2 =1.401 c 3 =-0.398.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-09-06 | 1992-03-07 | 1992-09-06 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-09-06 | 1996-03-07 | 1996-09-06 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-09-06 | 2000-03-07 | 2000-09-06 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |