US4763004A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Calibration method for electron beam exposer
Assignee: Fujitsu Ltd
•
Filing: 1985-01-04
•
Granted: 1988-08-09
•
Expires: 2005-01-04
Abstract
Abstract A method of correcting the aberration of an electron beam due to astigmatism and field curvature of focus by feeding a correction current through stigmator coils and a focus correction coil. The correction currents are determined by measuring a sharpness P of the electron beam. The sharpness P is defined as a product of p x , a sharpness measured when the electron beam is deflected in X direction, and p y , a sharpness measured when the electron beam is deflected in Y direction: P=p x ×p y . The use of the sharpness P provides good convergence of the measurements and it becomes possible to calibrate the electron beam for many points in the scanning field. Thus, it is possible to attain maximum resolution over an entire scanning field. Optimum correction currents are determined from data obtained by varying each correction current while keeping the other correction currents constant to obtain several values of P and then using a least square approximation of the measured values of P with a quadrature curve.
Inventors
- 👤 Hiroshi Yasuda
- 👤 Takayuki Miyazaki
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-29 18:32
CPC Classifications
H; H01; H01J; H01J37/00; H01J37/30; H01J37/304; H01J37/02; H01J37/04; H01J37/153; H01J2237/00; H01J2237/30; H01J2237/304; H01J2237/30433; H01J2237/3045; H01J2237/30455; H01J2237/317; H01J2237/3175; H01J2237/31761; H01J2237/31764
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 21
Claim 1
Independent Claim
173 words
A method of calibrating an electron beam exposer, for scanning an electron beam over a substrate, by determining correction currents I x , I y and I F to be applied to correction coils to correct the aberration due to astigmatism in the X and Y directions and field curvature of focus, respectively, comprising the steps of: (a) measuring a sharpness P of the electron beam, said sharpness P being defined as the product of p x , which represents a sharpness defined as the differentiated value of a signal resulting when the electron beam is deflected in the X direction, and p y , which represents a sharpness defined as the differentiated value of a signal resulting when the electron beam is deflected in the Y direction; (b) varying one of said correction currents while keeping the other two correction currents constant, and repeating step (a) for each variation of the varied correction current; and (c) determining an optimum value for said varied correction current from data obtained in the step (b).
Claim 2
Independent Claim
173 words
A method of calibrating an electron beam exposer, for scanning an electron beam over a substrate, by determining correction currents I x , I y and I F to be applied to correction coils to correct the aberration due to astigmatism in the X and Y directions and field curvature of focus, respectively, comprising the steps of: (a) measuring a sharpness P of the electron beam, said sharpness P being defined as the product of p x , which represents a sharpness defined as the differentiated value of a signal resulting when the electron beam is deflected in the X direction, and p y , which represents a sharpness defined as the differentiated value of a signal resulting when the electron beam is deflected in the Y direction; (b) varying one of said correction currents while keeping the other two correction currents constant, and repeating step (a) for each variation of the varied correction current; and (c) determining an optimum value for said varied correction current from data obtained in the step (b).
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
43 words
A calibration method according to claim 1, wherein the measurement of the sharpness in step (a) includes measuring a variation of electrons scattered by a surface of a test mark, when the electron beam is deflected across an edge of said test mark.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
38 words
A calibration method according to claim 2, further comprising the steps of forming the test mark on a substrate and locating the test mark at a point where the calibration of the electron beam is to be performed.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
35 words
A calibration method according to claim 1, wherein the determination of the optimum value of the correction current in step (c) includes approximating the measured value by a least square method with a quadratic curve.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
31 words
A calibration method according to claim 1, wherein step (b) includes varying the varied correction current so that each measured value of P varies by about 5-10% from the previous value.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
49 words
A calibration method according to claim 1, wherein the measurement of p x and p y in step (a) includes elongating the electron beam spot in the Y direction when p x is measured, and elongating the electron beam spot in the X direction when p y is measured.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
49 words
A calibration method according to claim 1, wherein the substrate includes a plurality of deflection fields, further comprising the steps of determining correction currents at predetermined matrix points in each deflection field, and determining the correction currents for other points from the correction currents for the predetermined matrix points.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
27 words
A calibration method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of (d) setting the the varied correction current at the optimum value determined in step (c).
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
41 words
A calibration method according to claim 8, further comprising the steps of: (e) repeating steps (a)-(d) to determine an optimum value for each of the correction currents; and (f) repeating steps (a)-(e) until the optimum values of the correction currents converge.
Claim 11
Independent Claim
189 words
A method for calibrating an electron beam exposer, for scanning an electron beam over a substrate, by determining correction currents I x , I y and I F to be applied to correction coils for correcting aberrations of the electron beam due to astigmatism in the X and Y directions and field curvature of focus of the electron beam, respectively, comprising the steps of: (a) setting each of the correction currents at an initial value; (b) measuring a sharpness p x of the electron beam when the electron beam is deflected in the Y direction; (c) measuring a sharpness p y of the electron beam when the electron beam is deflected in the Y direction; (d) determining a sharpness P of the electron beam in terms of the product of p x and p y ; (e) varying one of the product of the correction currents and repeating steps (b)-(d) for the varied correction current; (f) determining an optimum value of the varied correction current from the data obtained in step (d); (g) repeating steps (e) and (f) to determine an optimum value for each of the correction currents.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
189 words
A method for calibrating an electron beam exposer, for scanning an electron beam over a substrate, by determining correction currents I x , I y and I F to be applied to correction coils for correcting aberrations of the electron beam due to astigmatism in the X and Y directions and field curvature of focus of the electron beam, respectively, comprising the steps of: (a) setting each of the correction currents at an initial value; (b) measuring a sharpness p x of the electron beam when the electron beam is deflected in the Y direction; (c) measuring a sharpness p y of the electron beam when the electron beam is deflected in the Y direction; (d) determining a sharpness P of the electron beam in terms of the product of p x and p y ; (e) varying one of the product of the correction currents and repeating steps (b)-(d) for the varied correction current; (f) determining an optimum value of the varied correction current from the data obtained in step (d); (g) repeating steps (e) and (f) to determine an optimum value for each of the correction currents.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
20 words
A calibration method according to claim 10, wherein step (f) includes setting the varied correction currents at the optimum value.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
43 words
A calibration method according to claim 10, wherein the measurements of steps (b) and (c) are performed by deflecting the electron beam across an edge of a test mark and measuring a variation of electron scattered by a surface of the test mark.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
39 words
A calibration method according to claim 10, wherein step (e) includes varying the correction currents so that each value of the sharpness P determined in step (d) varies by 5-10% from the previously determined value of the sharpness P.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
44 words
A calibration method according to claim 1, wherein the measurement of the sharpness in step (a) includes measuring a variation of secondary electrons emitted from a surface of a test mark, when the electron beam is deflected across an edge of the test mark.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
40 words
A calibration method according to claim 1, wherein the measurement of the sharpness in step (a) includes measuring a variation of electrons transmitted through the test mark when the electron beam is deflected across an edge of the test mark.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
38 words
A calibration method according to claim 14, further comprising the steps of forming the test mark on a substrate and locating the test mark at a point where the calibration of the electron beam is to be performed.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
38 words
A calibration method according to claim 15, further comprising the steps of forming the test mark on a substrate and locating the test mark at a point where the calibration of the electron beam is to be performed.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
31 words
A calibration method according to claim 2, wherein said sharpnesses P, p x and p y are defined by the width of the beam spot in the X and Y directions.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
50 words
A calibration method according to claim 10, wherein the substrate includes a plurality of deflection fields, further comprising the steps of determining the correction currents at predetermined matrix points in each deflection field, and determining the correction currents for other points from the correction currents for the predetermined matrix points.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4180738A
Cited
GB2002547A
Cited
US4214163A
Cited
US4162403A
Cited
JPS567341A
Cited
US4336597A
Cited
GB2059120A
Cited
EP0030347A2
Cited
US4362942A
Cited
US4363104A
Cited
US4585943A
Cited
US4607333A
Cited
US4553260A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-08-09 | 1992-02-08 | 1992-08-09 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-08-09 | 1996-02-08 | 1996-08-09 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-08-09 | 2000-02-08 | 2000-08-09 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |