Patent US5051479A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4760529A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4760529A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Smooth stop control system
Assignee: Sumitomo Electric Industries Ltd
•
Filing: 1987-06-16
•
Granted: 1988-07-26
•
Expires: 2007-06-16
Abstract
Abstract A smooth stop control system for effecting the smooth stop of an object effected by a brake arrangement includes a detector for detecting an actual speed of the object, a calculator for calculating an actual deceleration of the object and also for calculating a degree of deceleration which changes continuously until the complete stop of said object. It further includes a control which compares the actual deceleration with the calculated deceleration, and controls the brake arrangement in accordance with the result of the comparison so as to render the actual deceleration substantially equal to the calculated deceleration.
Inventors
- 👤 Koji Takata
- 👤 Masato Yoshino
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-06 01:04
CPC Classifications
B; B60; B60T; B60T8/00; B60T8/17; B60T8/176; B60T8/1761; B60T8/17616; B60T2230/00; B60T2230/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 17
Claim 1
Independent Claim
199 words
A smooth stop control system for effecting the smooth stop of an object having a controllable brake arrangement comprising: a means for detecting an actual deceleration of said object; a means for producing a normal control target deceleration; a means for comparing said actual deceleration with said normal control target deceleration to produce a difference between said actual deceleration and said normal control target deceleration; and a means for controlling said brake arrangement so as to minimize said difference and thereby making said actual deceleration substantially equal to said normal control target deceleration, further comprising: a means for producing a smooth stop control target deceleration which overrides said normal control target deceleration at the near end of a stop and comparing said smooth stop control target deceleration with said actual deceleration to produce said difference to control said brake arrangement, said smooth stop control target deceleration a being such that it is calculated according to the equation: a=a.sub.o ×f(v/v.sub.o) wherein a o and v o are deceleration and speed, respectively, at the entering of the smooth stop control, v is the actual speed of the object, and f(v/v o ) is a function with a variant v/v o .
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
199 words
A smooth stop control system for effecting the smooth stop of an object having a controllable brake arrangement comprising: a means for detecting an actual deceleration of said object; a means for producing a normal control target deceleration; a means for comparing said actual deceleration with said normal control target deceleration to produce a difference between said actual deceleration and said normal control target deceleration; and a means for controlling said brake arrangement so as to minimize said difference and thereby making said actual deceleration substantially equal to said normal control target deceleration, further comprising: a means for producing a smooth stop control target deceleration which overrides said normal control target deceleration at the near end of a stop and comparing said smooth stop control target deceleration with said actual deceleration to produce said difference to control said brake arrangement, said smooth stop control target deceleration a being such that it is calculated according to the equation: a=a.sub.o ×f(v/v.sub.o) wherein a o and v o are deceleration and speed, respectively, at the entering of the smooth stop control, v is the actual speed of the object, and f(v/v o ) is a function with a variant v/v o .
Claim 3
Independent Claim
185 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control of an object having a controllable brake arrangement comprising the steps of: detecting an actual deceleration of said object; producing a normal control target deceleration; comparing said actual deceleration with said normal control target deceleration to produce a difference between said actual deceleration and said normal control target deceleration; and controlling said brake arrangement so as to minimize said difference thereby making said actual deceleration substantially equal to said normal control target deceleration, characterized further comprising the step of: producing a smooth stop control target deceleration which overrides said normal control target deceleration at the near end of a stop and comparing said smooth stop control target deceleration with said actual deceleration to produce said difference to control said brake arrangement, said smooth stop control target deceleration a being calculated according to the equation: a=a.sub.o ×f(v/v.sub.o) wherein a o and v o are deceleration and speed, respectively, at the entering of the smooth stop control, v is the actual speed of the object, and f(v/v o ) is a function with a variant v/v o .
Claim 4
Independent Claim
185 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control of an object having a controllable brake arrangement comprising the steps of: detecting an actual deceleration of said object; producing a normal control target deceleration; comparing said actual deceleration with said normal control target deceleration to produce a difference between said actual deceleration and said normal control target deceleration; and controlling said brake arrangement so as to minimize said difference thereby making said actual deceleration substantially equal to said normal control target deceleration, characterized further comprising the step of: producing a smooth stop control target deceleration which overrides said normal control target deceleration at the near end of a stop and comparing said smooth stop control target deceleration with said actual deceleration to produce said difference to control said brake arrangement, said smooth stop control target deceleration a being calculated according to the equation: a=a.sub.o ×f(v/v.sub.o) wherein a o and v o are deceleration and speed, respectively, at the entering of the smooth stop control, v is the actual speed of the object, and f(v/v o ) is a function with a variant v/v o .
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
62 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 2, further comprising the step of: detecting an actual speed of said object; and comparing the said actual speed with a predetermined speed, whereby said smooth stop control target deceleration producing step overrides said normal control target deceleration when said actual speed is reduced down to said predetermined speed.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
27 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 3, wherein said predetermined speed is constant regardless of the deceleration of said object.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 3, wherein said predetermined speed increases with respect to the increase of the deceleration of said object.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
27 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 2, wherein said smooth stop control target deceleration changes sinusoidally with respect to time.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
33 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 2, wherein values of (v/v o ) and the corresponding values of f(v/v o ) are stored in a table.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
151 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 2, further comprising the steps of: detecting an actual speed of said object; and comparing said actual speed with a predetermined speed, whereby when said actual speed is reduced down to said predetermined speed, said smooth stop control step includes storing the values a o and v o , which represent deceleration and speed, respectively, at the start of the smooth stop control step, but suppressing the actual initiation of the smooth stop control step; calculating ##EQU18## in which v is the actual speed of the object, and a is the smooth stop control target deceleration; calculating g(v/v o ) which is a function with a variant v/v o ; and comparing ##EQU19## with g(v/v o ), whereby said controlling step initiates the smooth stop control step when ##EQU20## becomes equal to or smaller than g(v/v o ).
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
31 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 8, wherein various combinations of (v/v o ) and corresponding g(v/v o ) are stored in a table.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
30 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 8, wherein said function g is given as follows: ##EQU21## wherein K>1/2, and (n) being a constant.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
74 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 2, wherein said smooth stop control target deceleration (a) is calculated by a formula II given by an equation: ##EQU22## wherein (a t ) and (v t ) represent actual deceleration and speed at a certain time (t), respectively, (a t+ Δt) represents smooth stop control target deceleration at a time (t+Δt), and (Δt) represents a very short period of time.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
61 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 2, wherein, before the normal control overridden by said smooth stop control, said normal control is such that the target deceleration is the deceleration intended by the operator of the object and corresponds to the operating effort of the operator upon an operating means including a brake pedal.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
111 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 12, further comprising the steps of: detecting an absolute value of an intended deceleration (a M ) according to the degree of depression of a brake pedal during the smooth stop control; detecting an absolute value of the smooth stop control target deceleration (a S ) during the smooth stop control; comparing the two detected absolute values; and terminating the smooth stop control when said absolute value of the intended deceleration (a M ) falls down less than said absolute value of the smooth stop control target deceleration (a S ), whereupon the smooth stop control is terminated.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
109 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 12, further comprising the steps of: detecting an absolute value of an intended deceleration (a M ) according to the degree of depression of a brake pedal during the smooth stop control; detecting an absolute value of an initial smooth stop control target deceleration (a*) at which the smooth stop control actually starts; comparing the two detected absolute values; and terminating the smooth stop control when said absolute value of the intended deceleration (a M ) exceeds said absolute value of the initial smooth stop control target deceleration (a*), whereupon the smooth stop control is terminated.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
128 words
A method for carrying out a smooth stop control as claimed in claim 12, further comprising the steps of: detecting an absolute value of an intended deceleration (a M ) according to the degree of depression of a brake pedal during the smooth stop control; detecting an absolute value of a predetermined threshold deceleration which is greater than the absolute value of the smooth stop control target deceleration (a S ) during the smooth stop control; comparing the two detected absolute values; and terminating the smooth stop control when said absolute value of the intended deceleration (a M ) exceeds the predetermined threshold value which is greater than said absolute value of the smooth stop control target deceleration (a S ), whereupon the smooth stop control is terminated.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3473850A
Cited
US3519805A
Cited
US3829167A
Cited
US3920278A
Cited
US4094555A
Cited
US4180223A
Cited
US4327414A
Cited
US4530059A
Cited
US4552413A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-07-26 | 1992-01-25 | 1992-07-26 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-07-26 | 1996-01-25 | 1996-07-26 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-07-26 | 2000-01-25 | 2000-07-26 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |