← Back to Patent Explorer
US4757207A Expired / Lapsed US ⏱️ 0.0 years remaining

Measurement of registration of overlaid test patterns by the use of reflected light

Assignee: International Business Machines Corp
•
Filing: 1987-03-03
•
Granted: 1988-07-12
•
Expires: 2007-03-03
📄 Original PDF 🌐 Google Patents 🔄 Sync Now

Abstract

Abstract Two identical test patterns are overlaid upon each other on a planar substrate of semiconductor material A. Each pattern consists of a plurality of spaced parallel lines. The lines are arranged in two sets of horizontal lines and two sets of vertical lines. The line/space periodicity is known. The lines of the two test patterns are made of two different materials, B and C, respectively. Thus, the target pattern formed by the two test patterns and the substrate has four reflecting regions defined by the different layers in each region: A, AB, AC and ABC. Adjacent the overlaid patterns are four macro-zones each containing a different one of the four layers, A, AB, AC and ABC. Each macro-zone is illuminated by a broad spectrum light, such as that from an incandescent lamp, and the reflected light intensity from each macro-zone is measured. Then, the reflected light intensities from the two sets of horizontal lines are separately measured, as are the reflected intensities from the two sets of vertical lines. One then can calculate both the horizontal and vertical overlay error from the known periodicity and the measured light intensities. Instead of reflected intensities, one can use transmitted intensities. Depending upon the materials used, the illumination can be provided by sources of other electromagnetic radiations, such as infrared, ultraviolet and x-ray.

Inventors

  • 👤 Ronald E. Chappelow
  • 👤 Lawrence P. Hayes, deceased

Bibliographic Details

Application Number —
Jurisdiction US
Data Source google_patents
Last Synchronized 2026-10-31 13:45
CPC Classifications
G; G03; G03F; G03F7/00; G03F7/70; G03F7/70483; G03F7/70605; G03F7/70616; G03F7/70633

Claims Analysis

Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim 188 words
A method of measuring the error in registration of two overlaid patterns on a substrate, comprising the steps of: choosing the materials of the two patterns and of the substrate so that they both partially transmit and partially reflect incident electromagnetic radiation; designating the material of the substrate as A, and the materials of the two patterns as B and C, respectively, wherein the two overlaid patterns and the substrate form a target pattern having four regions consisting of four material layers A, AB, AC and ABC, respectively: forming on said substrate four reference zones, each consisting of a different one of said four material layers, respectively; exposing both said target pattern and said reference zones to incident electromagnetic radiation; measuring the intensity of the corresponding radiation reflected or transmitted by each of the four reference zones and by each of the four regions; averaging the measured intensities for the four reference zones to obtain an average reference value; and comparing the measured intensity for each of the four regions with the average reference value to obtain a measurement of the mis-registration of each of the overlaid patterns.
Claim 2
Independent Claim 188 words
A method of measuring the error in registration of two overlaid patterns on a substrate, comprising the steps of: choosing the materials of the two patterns and of the substrate so that they both partially transmit and partially reflect incident electromagnetic radiation; designating the material of the substrate as A, and the materials of the two patterns as B and C, respectively, wherein the two overlaid patterns and the substrate form a target pattern having four regions consisting of four material layers A, AB, AC and ABC, respectively: forming on said substrate four reference zones, each consisting of a different one of said four material layers, respectively; exposing both said target pattern and said reference zones to incident electromagnetic radiation; measuring the intensity of the corresponding radiation reflected or transmitted by each of the four reference zones and by each of the four regions; averaging the measured intensities for the four reference zones to obtain an average reference value; and comparing the measured intensity for each of the four regions with the average reference value to obtain a measurement of the mis-registration of each of the overlaid patterns.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim 22 words
A method as defined in claim 1, further comprising: simultaneously exposing said target pattern and said four reference zones to said radiation.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim 52 words
A method as defined in claim 2, further comprising the step of choosing said materials A, B and C such that neither the reflectivity nor the transmissivity of region A equals that of region ABC, and such that neither the reflectivity nor the transmissivity of region AB equals that of region AC.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim 15 words
A method as defined in claim 3, wherein said patterns comprise a plurality of lines.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim 12 words
A method as defined in claim 4, wherein said lines are parallel.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim 37 words
A method as defined in claim 3, wherein each pattern comprises a plurality of spaced horizontal parallel lines and a plurality of spaced vertical parallel lines, the line/space periodicity being the same for all of said lines.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim 37 words
A method as defined in claim 6, wherein each pattern is in the form of a grid with the horizontal lines in the first and third quadrants and the vertical lines in the second and fourth quadrants.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim 13 words
A method as defined in claim 3, wherein said patterns are circular areas.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim 14 words
A method as defined in claim 8, wherein said reference zones are circular areas.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim 57 words
A method as defined in claim 1, wherein each pattern consists of a grid of four quadrants, and further comprising individually measuring the intensities from the first and third quadrants and comparing them with the intensities from the four reference zones to obtain a measurement of the mis-registration in only one of the horizontal and vertical directions.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim 47 words
A method as defined in claim 10, further comprising individually measuring the intensities from the second and fourth quadrants and comparing them with the intensities from the four reference zones to obtain a measurement of the mis-registration in only the other of the horizontal and vertical directions.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim 25 words
A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the substrate is a silicon wafer, material B is silicon dioxide, and material C is a photoresist.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim 14 words
A method as defined in claim 1 wherein said electromagnetic radiation is incoherent light.

References Cited (Backward Citations)

US3531196A Cited
US3488106A Cited
US3660157A Cited
US3867038A Cited
US4009453A Cited
US4200395A Cited
US4211489A Cited
US4311389A Cited
US4327292A Cited
US4664524A Cited

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Annuity Stage Window Opens Payment Deadline Surcharge Period Until Estimated Fee Status
3.5 Years (Year 4) 1991-07-12 1992-01-11 1992-07-12 $2000.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8) 1995-07-12 1996-01-11 1996-07-12 $3760.00 Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12) 1999-07-12 2000-01-11 2000-07-12 $7700.00 Window Closed / Lapsed

Assigned Categories & Tags

No categories assigned to this patent yet.

Assign Category Tag