Patent US4754223A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4754223A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for the phase correction of MR inversion recovery images
Assignee: US Philips Corp
•
Filing: 1986-10-20
•
Granted: 1988-06-28
•
Expires: 2006-10-20
Abstract
Abstract During known MRI measurements, for example spin echo and inversion recovery measurements, phase errors occur in pixels, inter alia due to eddy currents caused by the application or interruption of magnetic field gradients during a measurement. There is proposed an inversion recovery method combined with a method where the magnetization is not inverted in advance in order to determine for each pixel the phase error in an image obtained by means of an inversion recovery method, so that inversion recovery images can be obtained which do not contain phase errors.
Inventors
- 👤 Josephus J. E. In Den Kleef
- 👤 Johannes P. Groen
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-11-05 18:34
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01R; G01R33/00; G01R33/20; G01R33/44; G01R33/48; G01R33/4818; G01R33/482; G01R33/54; G01R33/56; G01R33/565; G01R33/56518
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
165 words
In a method of determining a nuclear magnetization distribution in a region of a body which is situated in a steady, uniform magnetic field, generating spin resonance signals in the region of the body in first and second sequences by high-frequency excitation pulses, measuring said signals in the presence of magnetic field gradients superposed on the uniform magnetic field, the excitation pulse in one sequence being preceded by a high-frequency inversion pulse which inverts the nuclear magnetization, using a transformation to form a first image of complex image values from the first sequence and a second image of complex image values from the second sequence, said images representing nuclear magnetization distributions, the improvement comprising the step of determining the value of a sign function for each corresponding complex image value of the first image and the second image, each corresponding value of the sign function being determined from the phase difference between the corresponding complex image values of the first image and the second image.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
165 words
In a method of determining a nuclear magnetization distribution in a region of a body which is situated in a steady, uniform magnetic field, generating spin resonance signals in the region of the body in first and second sequences by high-frequency excitation pulses, measuring said signals in the presence of magnetic field gradients superposed on the uniform magnetic field, the excitation pulse in one sequence being preceded by a high-frequency inversion pulse which inverts the nuclear magnetization, using a transformation to form a first image of complex image values from the first sequence and a second image of complex image values from the second sequence, said images representing nuclear magnetization distributions, the improvement comprising the step of determining the value of a sign function for each corresponding complex image value of the first image and the second image, each corresponding value of the sign function being determined from the phase difference between the corresponding complex image values of the first image and the second image.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
25 words
The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sign function has the value one if-π/2<the phase difference<π/2, and otherwise has the value minus one.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
62 words
The method as claimed in claim 1 or 2, wherein the variation of the magnetic field gradients is identical in the two sequences for each corresponding pair of resonance signals, and further comprising the step of applying a dummy gradient in the second sequence at the location which corresponds to that at which the high-frequency inversion pulse occurs in the first sequence.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
42 words
The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the second sequence is generated with a different resolution from the first sequence and by interpolation and transformation an image is obtained therefrom having the same resolution as an image from the first sequence.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
53 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, where a third image is formed from the first and the second complex image, wherein each pixel of the third image is derived from the product of the image amplitude of the corresponding pixel of the first image and the associated value of the sign function.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
60 words
A method as claimed in claim 1, where for each pixel there is determined a ratio which depends on the longitudinal relaxation time T 1 , characterized in that the ratio is the quotient of the image amplitude of the corresponding pixels of the first and the second image, multiplied by the value of the sign function for these pixels.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
121 words
In a method for determining a nuclear magnetic distribution in a region of a body wherein spin resonance signals are generated in the region of the body in first and second sequences and wherein transformations are used to form a first image of complex image values from the first sequence of spin resonance signals and a second image of complex image values from the second sequence of spin resonance signals, the improvement comprising determining the value of a sign function for each corresponding complex image value of the first image and the second image, each corresponding value of the sign function being determined from the phase difference between the corresponding complex image values of the first image and the second image.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
121 words
In a method for determining a nuclear magnetic distribution in a region of a body wherein spin resonance signals are generated in the region of the body in first and second sequences and wherein transformations are used to form a first image of complex image values from the first sequence of spin resonance signals and a second image of complex image values from the second sequence of spin resonance signals, the improvement comprising determining the value of a sign function for each corresponding complex image value of the first image and the second image, each corresponding value of the sign function being determined from the phase difference between the corresponding complex image values of the first image and the second image.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
65 words
The method according to claim 7 further comprising forming a third image of pixels from the first image of complex image values and the sign function wherein each corresponding pixel of the third image has a value that is derived from the product of the image amplitude of the corresponding complex image value of the first image and the corresponding value of the sign function.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
74 words
The method according to claim 8 further comprising forming a third image of pixels from the first and second images of complex values and the sign function wherein each corresponding pixel of the third image has a value that is derived by forming the quotient of the amplitude of each corresponding complex image value of the first image and the second image and multiplying each quotient by the corresponding value of the sign function.
Claim 12
Independent Claim
36 words
The method of any one of claims 7-9 wherein the sign function has the value one if the phase difference has a value greater than-π/2 and less than π/2, and otherwise has the value minus one.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-06-28 | 1991-12-28 | 1992-06-28 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-06-28 | 1995-12-28 | 1996-06-28 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-06-28 | 1999-12-28 | 2000-06-28 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |