Patent US2204974A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
Patent US4241167A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4750131A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of detecting faulty parts in a progressive die press
Assignee: RCA Licensing Corp
•
Filing: 1985-09-11
•
Granted: 1988-06-07
•
Expires: 2005-09-11
Abstract
Abstract A method of detecting the forming of defective parts with a progressive die includes the step of generating a reference force/displacement curve for each forming station of the die while a number of sample parts are formed. The curves are stored in a data processor. The forming force at each forming station, and the displacement are monitored during the formation of production parts and supplied to the data processor. The production force data are compared to the reference force data for each displacement to indicate faults in various parameters previously set into the data processor.
Inventors
- 👤 Miguel R. Martinez
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-31 16:12
CPC Classifications
B; B30; B30B; B30B15/00; B30B15/0094; B30B15/28; G; G05; G05B; G05B19/00; G05B19/02; G05B19/18; G05B19/406; G05B19/4063; G05B2219/00; G05B2219/30; G05B2219/45; G05B2219/45137; G05B2219/50; G05B2219/50197
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 12
Claim 1
Independent Claim
263 words
A method of detecting the forming of faulty parts in a progressive die press having a plurality of forming stations, a forming tool and a force transducer at each of said stations, and means for measuring the displacement of said forming tools comprising the steps of: producing a preselected number of sample parts while collecting reference force data from all of said force transducers for a plurality of displacements of said forming tools; providing said reference force data and said displacements to a data processor and, producing and storing a reference force/displacement curve for each of said forming stations; forming production parts while monitoring said force transducers for each of said stations and providing production force data, for each of said forming stations, to said data processor; comparing said production force data to said reference force/displacement curve for each of said displacements, and for each of said forming stations; and indicating a faulty part when said production force data, for at least one of said displacements, is different from said reference force data of said reference force/displacement curve by a preselected difference; setting a plurality of stop flags into said data processor, each of said stop flags defining a parameter to be compared in detecting a faulty part, said parameters including a maximum forming force and a minimum forming force; and comparing the displacement at which the highest forming force occurs during the formation of a production part with the displacement at which said maximum force occurs on said reference force/displacement curve to identify the type of fault which caused said faulty part.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
263 words
A method of detecting the forming of faulty parts in a progressive die press having a plurality of forming stations, a forming tool and a force transducer at each of said stations, and means for measuring the displacement of said forming tools comprising the steps of: producing a preselected number of sample parts while collecting reference force data from all of said force transducers for a plurality of displacements of said forming tools; providing said reference force data and said displacements to a data processor and, producing and storing a reference force/displacement curve for each of said forming stations; forming production parts while monitoring said force transducers for each of said stations and providing production force data, for each of said forming stations, to said data processor; comparing said production force data to said reference force/displacement curve for each of said displacements, and for each of said forming stations; and indicating a faulty part when said production force data, for at least one of said displacements, is different from said reference force data of said reference force/displacement curve by a preselected difference; setting a plurality of stop flags into said data processor, each of said stop flags defining a parameter to be compared in detecting a faulty part, said parameters including a maximum forming force and a minimum forming force; and comparing the displacement at which the highest forming force occurs during the formation of a production part with the displacement at which said maximum force occurs on said reference force/displacement curve to identify the type of fault which caused said faulty part.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 1 further including the steps of comparing the displacement at which the lowest forming force occurs during the formation of a production part with the displacement at which said minimum forming force occurs on said reference force/displacement curve to identify the type of fault which caused said faulty part.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 2 wherein the points for said reference force/displacement curve are obtained by averaging said reference force data, for each of said displacements, obtained while forming all of said sample parts.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 3 further including the step of calculating a forming force change by detecting the forming force at each of said displacements and subtracting the forming force at the immediately preceding displacement.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 4 further including the steps of continuously applying said force data and said displacements to said data processor as digital signals, and clocking said force data and said displacements into said data processor at the clock rate of said data processor.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 1 wherein the points for said reference force/displacement curve are obtained by averaging said reference force data, for each of said displacements, obtained while forming all of said sample parts.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 6 further including the steps of continuously applying said force data and said displacements to said data processor as digital signals, and clocking said force data and said displacements into said data processor at the clock rate of said data processor.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 7 further including the step of calculating a forming force change by detecting the forming force at each of said displacements and subtracting the forming force at the immediately preceding displacement.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
35 words
The method of claim 1 further including the step of calculating a forming force change by detecting the forming force at each of said displacements and subtracting the forming force at the immediately preceding displacement.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 9 further including the steps of comparing the displacement at which the lowest forming force occurs during the formation of a production part with the displacement at which said minimum forming force occurs on said reference force/displacement curve to identify the type of fault which caused said faulty part.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
34 words
The method of claim 10 wherein the points for said reference force/displacement curve are obtained by averaging said reference force data, for each of said displacements, obtained while forming all of said sample parts.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3257652A
Cited
US3930248A
Cited
US4088899A
Cited
US4121449A
Cited
US4057713A
Cited
US4125009A
Cited
US4470287A
Cited
US4320463A
Cited
US4408471A
Cited
US4504920A
Cited
US4481589A
Cited
US4536849A
Cited
US4532793A
Cited
US4548066A
Cited
US4592220A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-06-07 | 1991-12-07 | 1992-06-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-06-07 | 1995-12-07 | 1996-06-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-06-07 | 1999-12-07 | 2000-06-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |