US4088899A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method for controlling an automatic machine tool
Assignee: Westinghouse Electric Corp
•
Filing: 1976-09-14
•
Granted: 1978-05-09
•
Expires: 1996-09-14
Abstract
Abstract An automatic punch press and monitoring system. The monitoring system includes a piezoelectric accelerometer mounted within the stationary die shoe of the punch press, and electronic circuitry including a variable gain amplifier, a detector, an integrator, and a comparator. The monitoring system is manually placed in a "LEARN" mode whereupon the signal produced by the accelerometer during normal operation of the punch press is amplified, detected, and integrated over the time period of one stroke to produce a test function. The gain of the amplifier is automatically adjusted during successive normal strokes of the punch press until the test function is equal to an arbitrary set point, thereby establishing a reference function. The monitoring system is then automatically placed in an "AUTO CONTROL" mode whereupon on each succeeding stroke, with the gain of the amplifier fixed, the test function produced is compared with the reference function. If the test function is above a first high limit level corresponding to a percentage of the reference function and below a second high limit level corresponding to a second percentage of the reference function a check alarm is activated. If the test function is above the second high limit level or below a low limit level corresponding to a third percentage of the reference function the punch press is shut down.
Inventors
- 👤 Robert C. Miller
- 👤 George T. Mallick, Jr.
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 10:57
CPC Classifications
G; G01; G01H; G01H1/00; B; B21; B21D; B21D55/00; B23; B23Q; B23Q11/00; B30; B30B; B30B15/00; B30B15/28; Y; Y10; Y10T; Y10T83/00; Y10T83/04
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 14
Claim 1
Independent Claim
100 words
A method for controlling the operation of a machine tool performing a repetitive operation, comprising: producing a signal in response to mechanical impulses caused by contact between a workpiece and a tool surface of a machine tool performing a repetitive operation; generating a test function which is a function of the time dependence of said signal; generating a reference function representative of said test function evaluated during normal operation of said machine tool; comparing said test function and said reference function; and taking corrective action when said test function and said reference function differ by more than a predetermined amount.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
100 words
A method for controlling the operation of a machine tool performing a repetitive operation, comprising: producing a signal in response to mechanical impulses caused by contact between a workpiece and a tool surface of a machine tool performing a repetitive operation; generating a test function which is a function of the time dependence of said signal; generating a reference function representative of said test function evaluated during normal operation of said machine tool; comparing said test function and said reference function; and taking corrective action when said test function and said reference function differ by more than a predetermined amount.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
32 words
A method for controlling the operation of the machine tool as described in claim 1, said method further comprising the step of amplifying said transducer signal prior to a generating test function.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
79 words
A method as described in claim 2 further comprising the step of establishing said reference function by varying the gain of an amplifier amplifying said signal prior to generating said test function, the gain of the amplifier being varied on successive repetitive operations until the test function evaluated during normal operation of the machine tool is equal to an arbitrary setpoint level, and maintaining the gain of said amplifier at that level during subsequent operation of the machine tool.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
54 words
A method as described in claim 1 wherein said test function is compared with said reference function and first corrective action is taken when said test function is less than said reference function and second corrective action is taken when said test function exceeds said reference function by more than a first predetermined amount.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method as described in claim 1 wherein said test function is compared with said reference function and first corrective action is also taken when said test function exceeds said reference function by more than a second predetermined amount.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
101 words
A method as described in claim 1 wherein said reference function is established by operating the machine tool and insuring that the tool is operating in a normal manner, placing the system in a "LEARN" mode by operator action, automatically varying the gain of an amplifier connected between the transducer and the means for generating the test function on successive machine tool operations until the test function is equal to an arbitrary setpoint level, placing the system in an "AUTO CONTROL" mode, and maintaining the gain of the amplifier at the test function level during subsequent operation of the machine tool.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method for controlling the operation of a machine tool as recited in claim 1 wherein said test function is proportional to the time integral of said signal evaluated over the time period of each repetitive machine tool operation.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
44 words
A method for controlling the operation of a machine tool as recited in claim 7, comprising the step of producing a synchronization pulse at the same point in each machine tool operation and using said pulse to reset an integrator producing said test function.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
32 words
A method for controlling the operation of the machine tool as recited in claim 7, said method further comprising the step of amplifying said transducer signal prior to generating said test function.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
77 words
A method as recited in claim 9 wherein the step of establishing said reference function is performed by varying the gain of an amplifier amplifying said signal prior to generating said test function, the gain of the amplifier being varied on successive repetitive operations until the test function evaluated during normal operation of the machine tool is equal to an arbitrary setpoint level, and maintaining the gain of said amplifier during subsequent operation of the machine tool.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
54 words
A method as recited in claim 7 wherein said test function is compared with said reference function and first corrective action is taken when said test function is less than said reference function, and second corrective action is taken when said test function exceeds said reference function by more than a first predetermined amount.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
39 words
A method as recited in claim 7 wherein said test function is compared with said reference function and first corrective action is also taken when said test function exceeds said reference function by more than a second predetermined amount.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
101 words
A method as recited in claim 7 wherein said reference function is established by operating the machine tool and insuring that the tool is operating in a normal manner, placing the system in a "LEARN" mode by operator action, automatically varying the gain of an amplifier connected between the transducer and the means for generating the test function on successive machine tool operations until the test function is equal to an arbitrary setpoint level, placing the system in an "AUTO CONTROL" mode, and maintaining the gain of the amplifier at the test function level during subsequent operation of the machine tool.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3930248A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1981-05-08 | 1981-11-07 | 1982-05-09 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1985-05-08 | 1985-11-07 | 1986-05-09 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1989-05-08 | 1989-11-07 | 1990-05-09 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |