Patent US4749985A successfully refreshed from Google Patents.
US4749985A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Functional relationship-based alarm processing
Assignee: United States Department of Energy
•
Filing: 1987-04-13
•
Granted: 1988-06-07
•
Expires: 2007-04-13
Abstract
Abstract A functional relationship-based alarm processing system and method analyzes each alarm as it is activated and determines its relative importance with other currently activated alarms and signals in accordance with the relationships that the newly activated alarm has with other currently activated alarms. Once the initial level of importance of the alarm has been determined, that alarm is again evaluated if another related alarm is activated. Thus, each alarm's importance is continuously oupdated as the state of the process changes during a scenario. Four hierarchical relationships are defined by this alarm filtering methodology: (1) level precursor (usually occurs when there are two alarm settings on the same parameter); (2) direct precursor (based on caussal factors between two alarms); (3) required action (system response or action) expected within a specified time following activation of an alarm or combination of alarms and process signals); and (4) blocking condition (alarms that are normally expected and are not considered important). The alarm processing system and method is sensitive to the dynamic nature of the process being monitored and is capable of changing the relative importance of each alarm as necessary.
Inventors
- 👤 Daniel R. Corsberg
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-24 12:49
CPC Classifications
G; G07; G07C; G07C3/00; G08; G08B; G08B23/00; G08B25/00; G08B25/14; G05; G05B; G05B2219/00; G05B2219/20; G05B2219/24; G05B2219/24063; G05B2219/24086; G05B2219/24123
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 26
Claim 1
Independent Claim
254 words
In the monitoring of a process, a method for classifying a plurality of process alarms A and B each representing a respective operating state of said process as of primary importance or of secondary importance based upon functional relationships among said alarms, said method comprising the steps of: defining each of the alarms A and B in terms of one of the following relationship categories: alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B such that alarm A should occur before alarm B; alarm A is a direct precursor of alarm B such that alarm A should occur before alarm B and alarm A's occurrence can cause alarm B's occurrence; alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that occurrence of alarm B should cause the activation of alarm A; or alarm A is a blocking condition for alarm B such that, with both alarms A and B activated, alarm B will not be processed until alarm A is no longer activated, or clears; and assigning primary importance to an activated alarm and secondary importance to that alarm which is not activated when one of the alarms is activated and the other alarm is not activated, and, where both alarm A and alarm B are activated, assigning primary importance to alarm B and secondary importance to alarm A where alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B or assigning primary importance to alarm A and secondary importance to alarm B for the remaining relationship categories between alarms A and B.
Claim 2
Dependent Claim
254 words
In the monitoring of a process, a method for classifying a plurality of process alarms A and B each representing a respective operating state of said process as of primary importance or of secondary importance based upon functional relationships among said alarms, said method comprising the steps of: defining each of the alarms A and B in terms of one of the following relationship categories: alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B such that alarm A should occur before alarm B; alarm A is a direct precursor of alarm B such that alarm A should occur before alarm B and alarm A's occurrence can cause alarm B's occurrence; alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that occurrence of alarm B should cause the activation of alarm A; or alarm A is a blocking condition for alarm B such that, with both alarms A and B activated, alarm B will not be processed until alarm A is no longer activated, or clears; and assigning primary importance to an activated alarm and secondary importance to that alarm which is not activated when one of the alarms is activated and the other alarm is not activated, and, where both alarm A and alarm B are activated, assigning primary importance to alarm B and secondary importance to alarm A where alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B or assigning primary importance to alarm A and secondary importance to alarm B for the remaining relationship categories between alarms A and B.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of displaying the alarm designated as being of primary importance.
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
52 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the steps of displaying the alarm designated as being of primary importance in a first display mode and displaying the alarm designated as being of secondary importance in a second display mode, where said first display mode is more pronounced than said second display mode.
Claim 5
Dependent Claim
39 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B and wherein only alarm B is activated, further comprising the step of providing an indication that alarm A is expected prior to alarm B.
Claim 6
Dependent Claim
56 words
The method of claim 1 wherein alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B and an alarm C is a direct precursor to alarm B, wherein alarms A and B are activated and alarm C is not activated, further comprising the step of assigning primary importance to alarm B and secondary importance to alarm A.
Claim 7
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a level precursor of alarm B and an alarm C is a direct precursor to alarm B, wherein alarms A, B and C are activated, further comprising the step of assigning primary importance to alarm C and secondary importance to alarms A and B.
Claim 8
Dependent Claim
67 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a predetermined time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is activated within said predetermined time interval, further comprising the step of assigning primary importance to alarm A and secondary importance to alarm B.
Claim 9
Dependent Claim
62 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is not activated within said predetermined time interval, further comprising the step of assigning primary importance to alarm A.
Claim 10
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 8 further comprising the step of providing an indication that alarm A was expected within said predetermined time interval of the activation of alarm B.
Claim 11
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 9 further comprising the step of assigning a highest level of importance to alarm A.
Claim 12
Dependent Claim
67 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is activated after said predetermined time interval, further comprising the step of assigning primary importance to alarm A and secondary importance to alarm B.
Claim 13
Dependent Claim
73 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarm A is inactive and alarm B is activated followed by de-activation of alarm B during said designated time interval, further comprising the step of maintaining alarms A and B with their respective current levels of importance.
Claim 14
Dependent Claim
68 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is not activated within said designated time interval followed by de-activation of alarm B, further comprising the step of assigning secondary importance to alarm A.
Claim 15
Dependent Claim
75 words
The method of claim 1 wherein alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarms A and B are activated followed by de-activation of alarm A and re-activation of alarm A within said designated time interval, further comprising the step of assigning primary importance to alarm A and secondary importance to alarm B.
Claim 16
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarms A and B are activated followed by de-activation of alarm A and wherein alarm A is not re-activated within said designated time interval, further comprising the step of assigning primary importance to alarm A.
Claim 17
Dependent Claim
29 words
The method of claim 15 further comprising the step of providing an indication that alarm A was expected within said predetermined time interval of the activation of alarm B.
Claim 18
Dependent Claim
19 words
The method of claim 16 further comprising the step of assigning a highest level of importance to alarm A.
Claim 19
Dependent Claim
67 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is activated after said predetermined time interval, further comprising the step of assigning primary importance to alarm A and secondary importance to alarm B.
Claim 20
Dependent Claim
71 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarms A and B are activated followed by de-activation of alarm B and failure of alarm A to de-activate within said predetermined time interval, further comprising the step of assigning secondary importance to alarm A.
Claim 21
Dependent Claim
69 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a priority required action of alarm B such that activation of alarm B is expected within a designated time interval of the activation of alarm A, wherein alarms A and B are activated followed by de-activation of alarm B and de-activation of alarm A within said predetermined time interval, further comprising the step of assigning secondary importance to alarm A.
Claim 22
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a blocking condition for alarm B and wherein alarm A is activated and alarm B is not activated, further comprising the step of assigning a level of importance to alarm A in accordance with its relationship categories to other activated alarms.
Claim 23
Dependent Claim
13 words
The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of displaying alarm A.
Claim 24
Dependent Claim
50 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a blocking condition for alarm B and wherein alarm B is activated and alarm A is not activated, further comprising the step of assigning a level of importance to alarm B in accordance with its relationship categories to other activated alarms.
Claim 25
Dependent Claim
45 words
The method of claim 1 where alarm A is a blocking condition for alarm B and wherein alarms A and B are both activated, further comprising the steps of assigning secondary importance to alarm B and allowing the priority of alarm A to remain unchanged.
Claim 26
Dependent Claim
26 words
The method of claim 24 further comprising the steps of preventing a display of alarm B and allowing a display of alarm A to remain unchanged.
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US4015237A
Cited
US4401971A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-06-07 | 1991-12-07 | 1992-06-07 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-06-07 | 1995-12-07 | 1996-06-07 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-06-07 | 1999-12-07 | 2000-06-07 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |