US4742444A
Expired / Lapsed
US
⏱️ 0.0 years remaining
Method of optimizing drive controls in machine tools having computer control
Assignee: Siemens AG
•
Filing: 1985-07-18
•
Granted: 1988-05-03
•
Expires: 2005-07-18
Abstract
Abstract A method of optimizing drive controls in a computer-controlled machine tool. The method comprises the steps of (a) ascertaining the system parameters of the drive control system from an open-loop system response, (b) computing the control parameters of a control system from the system parameters and a closed-loop target response, (c) simulating a closed-loop control system using the system and control parameters, (d) comparing the target response with a simulated response, (e) varying the control parameters in the simulated control system, (f) repeating steps (d) and (e) until the responses coincide and (g) setting the final control parameters into the control loop of the actual drive control system. The method steps are executed by means of the machine tool computer control.
Inventors
- 👤 Horst Gose
- 👤 Wolfgang Papiernik
Bibliographic Details
Application Number
—
Jurisdiction
US
Data Source
google_patents
Last Synchronized
2026-10-25 19:36
CPC Classifications
G; G05; G05B; G05B19/00; G05B19/02; G05B19/18; G05B19/414; G05B2219/00; G05B2219/30; G05B2219/41; G05B2219/41248; G05B2219/42; G05B2219/42155
Claims Analysis
Total Claims: 4
Claim 1
Independent Claim
256 words
A method of optimizing drive controls in machine tools having computer control, comprising the steps of: (a) inputting a first reference input signal function into an open-loop configuration of the actual drive control system and ascertaining system parameters from the resultant system response; (b) computing a second reference input signal function and control parameters from the system parameters of step (a) and a desired target system response of a closed-loop configuration of the drive control system; (c) simulating the closed-loop configuration of the drive control system by using the system parameters and the control parameters; (d) inputting the second reference input signal function into the simulated drive control system and comparing a simulated system response with the desired target system response; (e) varying the control parameters for reducing the deviation between the simulated system response and the desired target system response; (f) repeating steps (d) and (e) until the simulated system response and the desired target system response coincide; (g) setting the control parameters into a drive control feedback loop of the closed-loop configuration of the actual drive control system; and (h) inputting the second reference input signal function into the closed-loop configuration of the actual drive control system, comparing the actual drive control system response with the desired target system response, varying the control parameters for reducing the deviation therebetween to a predetermined amount, repeating the comparing and varying steps until the deviation therebetween reaches a predetermined amount, and setting the control parameters into the drive control feedback loop of the actual drive control system.
Claim 2
Independent Claim
256 words
A method of optimizing drive controls in machine tools having computer control, comprising the steps of: (a) inputting a first reference input signal function into an open-loop configuration of the actual drive control system and ascertaining system parameters from the resultant system response; (b) computing a second reference input signal function and control parameters from the system parameters of step (a) and a desired target system response of a closed-loop configuration of the drive control system; (c) simulating the closed-loop configuration of the drive control system by using the system parameters and the control parameters; (d) inputting the second reference input signal function into the simulated drive control system and comparing a simulated system response with the desired target system response; (e) varying the control parameters for reducing the deviation between the simulated system response and the desired target system response; (f) repeating steps (d) and (e) until the simulated system response and the desired target system response coincide; (g) setting the control parameters into a drive control feedback loop of the closed-loop configuration of the actual drive control system; and (h) inputting the second reference input signal function into the closed-loop configuration of the actual drive control system, comparing the actual drive control system response with the desired target system response, varying the control parameters for reducing the deviation therebetween to a predetermined amount, repeating the comparing and varying steps until the deviation therebetween reaches a predetermined amount, and setting the control parameters into the drive control feedback loop of the actual drive control system.
Claim 3
Dependent Claim
53 words
The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein simulating the closed-loop configuration of the drive control system further comprises characterizing an arbitrary continuous function input in terms of a weighting function and a simulated system response to said input in terms of a convolution summation using the system parameters of step (a).
Claim 4
Dependent Claim
47 words
The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein simulating the closed-loop configuration of the drive control system further comprises characterizing a simulated system response in terms of a difference equation of a given order, said order being determined from the resultant system response of step (a).
References Cited (Backward Citations)
US3532862A
Cited
US3727035A
Cited
US4054780A
Cited
US4214301A
Cited
US4441151A
Cited
US4368510A
Cited
US4407013A
Cited
US4432439A
Cited
US4590578A
Cited
US4578747A
Cited
US4602326A
Cited
USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows
| Annuity Stage | Window Opens | Payment Deadline | Surcharge Period Until | Estimated Fee | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 Years (Year 4) | 1991-05-03 | 1991-11-02 | 1992-05-03 | $2000.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 7.5 Years (Year 8) | 1995-05-03 | 1995-11-02 | 1996-05-03 | $3760.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |
| 11.5 Years (Year 12) | 1999-05-03 | 1999-11-02 | 2000-05-03 | $7700.00 | Window Closed / Lapsed |