US4689441A — Routing method and pattern for reducing cross tal…

Claim 1

Independent Claim 129 words

In a circuit disposed on or within a wiring media and including a plurality of nets adjacently routed for adjacency lengths exceeding an inter-net adjacency routing limit thereby subjecting said plurality of nets to cross-talk inducing signals, anyone net of said nets having at least a first end point, an intermediate point, a second end point, a first conductor of said net interconnecting said first end point to said intermediate point, and a second conductor of said net interconecting said intermediate point to said second end point the improvement comprising a wiring pattern for reducing inter-net cross talk wherein said first and second conductors of said net are adjacently routed to one another for an adjacency length that does not exceed an intra-net adjacency routing limit for said net.

Claim 2

Dependent Claim 129 words

In a circuit disposed on or within a wiring media and including a plurality of nets adjacently routed for adjacency lengths exceeding an inter-net adjacency routing limit thereby subjecting said plurality of nets to cross-talk inducing signals, anyone net of said nets having at least a first end point, an intermediate point, a second end point, a first conductor of said net interconnecting said first end point to said intermediate point, and a second conductor of said net interconecting said intermediate point to said second end point the improvement comprising a wiring pattern for reducing inter-net cross talk wherein said first and second conductors of said net are adjacently routed to one another for an adjacency length that does not exceed an intra-net adjacency routing limit for said net.

Claim 3

Dependent Claim 24 words

The improved wiring pattern as defined in claim 1 wherein said routing is dimensioned to accomodate both cross talk minimization and propagation time requirements.

Claim 4

Dependent Claim 68 words

The improved wiring pattern as defined in claim 1 wherein said adjacent routing is such that cross talk has the same polarity as, and an amplitude lower than the active, cross talk-inducing signal, and wherein said cross talk leads said active signal by a time equal to twice the time required for said active signal to propagate the distance said first and second conductors run adjacent one another.

Claim 5

Dependent Claim 68 words

The improved wiring pattern as defined in claim 2 wherein said adjacent routing is such that cross talk has the same polarity as, and an amplitude lower than the active, cross talk-inducing signal, and wherein said cross talk leads said active signal by a time equal to twice the time required for said active signal to propagate the distance said first and second conductors run adjacent one another.

Claim 6

Dependent Claim 44 words

The improved wiring pattern as defined in claim 4 wherein said adjacent routing is such that cross talk constitutes a displacement in time of said active signal equal to or less than the transition time required for said active signal to change logic states.

Claim 7

Dependent Claim 28 words

The improved wiring pattern as defined in claim 1 wherein said first and second conductors are routed in immediately adjacent parallel wiring tracks of a single wiring channel.

Claim 8

Dependent Claim 28 words

The improved wiring pattern as defined in claim 2 wherein said first and second conductors are routed in immediately adjacent parallel wiring tracks of a single wiring channel.

Claim 9

Dependent Claim 35 words

The improved wiring pattern as defined in claim 1 wherein said adjacent routing of said first and second conductors is configured to replace inter-net cross talk with intra-net cross talk without substantially reducing wiring density.

Claim 10

Dependent Claim 35 words

The improved wiring pattern as defined in claim 2 wherein said adjacent routing of said first and second conductors is configured to replace inter-net cross talk with intra-net cross talk without substantially reducing wiring density.

Claim 11

Dependent Claim 50 words

A printed circuit board which includes a plurality of cross talk sensitive nets having a topology which includes the routing of conductors of the same net rather than those of different nets in channels of said board, where greater density can be achieved without violating intra-net adjacency routing length limits.

Claim 12

Dependent Claim 50 words

A printed circuit board which includes a plurality of cross talk sensitive nets having a topology which includes the routing of conductors of the same net rather than those of different nets in channels of said board, where greater density can be achieved without violating intra-net adjacency routing length limits.

Claim 13

Dependent Claim 18 words

The board as defined in claim 10 in which said conductors are serially interconnected at an intermediate pin.

Claim 14

Dependent Claim 110 words

In the method of constructing a circuit which includes at least two nets, one for carrying a signal having the potential of inducing excessive cross talk in the other and wherein at least one of said nets comprises a first end point, an intermediate point, a second end point, a first conductor of said net interconnecting said first end point to said intermediate point, and a second conductor of said net interconnecting said intermediate point with said second end point the improvement comprising: routing said first and second conductors to run adjacent one another for an adjacency length that does not exceed an intra-net adjacency routing limit in said net.

Claim 15

Dependent Claim 110 words

In the method of constructing a circuit which includes at least two nets, one for carrying a signal having the potential of inducing excessive cross talk in the other and wherein at least one of said nets comprises a first end point, an intermediate point, a second end point, a first conductor of said net interconnecting said first end point to said intermediate point, and a second conductor of said net interconnecting said intermediate point with said second end point the improvement comprising: routing said first and second conductors to run adjacent one another for an adjacency length that does not exceed an intra-net adjacency routing limit in said net.

Claim 16

Dependent Claim 72 words

A method as defined in claim 12 wherein said first and second conductors are routed adjacent to one another a distance D such that the induced cross talk has the same polarity as, and an amplitude lower than the active, cross talk-inducing, signal in said first and second conductors, and leads said active signal by a time equal to twice the time required for said active signal to propagate said distance D.

Claim 17

Dependent Claim 37 words

A method as defined in claim 12 wherein the step of routing said first and second conductors to run adjacent to one another comprises routing them in immediately adjacent parallel wiring tracks of a single wiring channel.

Claim 18

Dependent Claim 98 words

In the process of computing the topology of printed conductor patterns for interconnecting components in a plurality of nets on a substrate wherein said nets each include first and second conductors interconnected at a common intermediate point and wherein conductor layout is determined according to rules related to component location, spatial parameters, propagation time, stability, radiation, heat, noise and cross talk, the improvement comprising including among said process-controlling rules, for the purposes of minimizing cross talk, the preferred routing adjacent one another of said first and second conductors of a common net rather than conductors from different nets.

Claim 19

Dependent Claim 98 words

In the process of computing the topology of printed conductor patterns for interconnecting components in a plurality of nets on a substrate wherein said nets each include first and second conductors interconnected at a common intermediate point and wherein conductor layout is determined according to rules related to component location, spatial parameters, propagation time, stability, radiation, heat, noise and cross talk, the improvement comprising including among said process-controlling rules, for the purposes of minimizing cross talk, the preferred routing adjacent one another of said first and second conductors of a common net rather than conductors from different nets.

Claim 20

Dependent Claim 29 words

The process according to claim 15 wherein the computer layout comprises the routing of said adjacent conductors substantially in parallel in a channel bordered by pins of said components.

Claim 21

Dependent Claim 27 words

The process according to claim 15 in which one of said conductors connected to said common intermediate point is initially active while the other is initially quiet.

Claim 22

Dependent Claim 27 words

The process according to claim 16 in which one of said conductors connected to said common intermediate point is initially active while the other is initially quiet.

Annuity Stage	Window Opens	Payment Deadline	Surcharge Period Until	Estimated Fee	Status
3.5 Years (Year 4)	1990-08-24	1991-02-23	1991-08-25	$2000.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
7.5 Years (Year 8)	1994-08-24	1995-02-23	1995-08-25	$3760.00	Window Closed / Lapsed
11.5 Years (Year 12)	1998-08-24	1999-02-23	1999-08-25	$7700.00	Window Closed / Lapsed

Routing method and pattern for reducing cross talk noise problems on printed interconnection boards

Abstract

Inventors

Bibliographic Details

Claims Analysis

References Cited (Backward Citations)

USPTO Annuity & Maintenance Windows

Assigned Categories & Tags

Assign Category Tag